- Location
- France
Look, another sign that Mathilde is a deep-cover Lahmian vampire whose current identity is the result of self-imposed mind manipulation!"Weber," Van Hal says, and it takes you a moment to remember that that's you. "
Look, another sign that Mathilde is a deep-cover Lahmian vampire whose current identity is the result of self-imposed mind manipulation!"Weber," Van Hal says, and it takes you a moment to remember that that's you. "
Some credit should be given to her parents in that this is a world of magic with a culture somewhere around... 12'th century Europe (with a lot of anachronisms). Superstitions around Trolls, Fay, Changelings, Demons, and so forth, lived on well into the 19'th century in the real world, and theirs is a world of literal magic. There's a lot of different ways her parents could have rationalized away that she wasn't their daughter anymore, or possibly that she never was their daughter.
They likely loved her up to that point, and likely grieved over her, but once she showed magic she was a threat.
I think this is comparing apples and oranges, as one is built around baseless accusations and the other on sheer raw fear that we know is justified because we are a Mage and saw some shit. But i don' t personally see her family in good light either anyway. I can just grok why they did what they did, considering the religious fanaticism of the Empire, only relatively recently there being a place where mages can actually learn stuff and centuries of folk wisdom saying that magic bad because that way lies Chaos.A hundred years ago black kids weren't allowed to go to school with white kids in the U.S., and I feel very comfortably judging anyone who still thinks that was justified as not being good folks.
And so the idea and myth propagates, so much more comforting than the truth for those grieving families, until it's a centuries old, full blown cultural myth.
And here we ironically see one of those cultural myths propagating and exaggerating itself in modern times, as an insufficient or exaggerated basis morphs into being supposedly entirely baseless.I think this is comparing apples and oranges, as one is built around baseless accusations
A hundred years ago black kids weren't allowed to go to school with white kids in the U.S., and I feel very comfortably judging anyone who still thinks that was justified as not being good folks.
Even if we ignore the fact that burning children is wrong, regardless of whether or not they're yours, it is still a dumb practice that heightens the risk for everybody.
If showing magic leads directly to your death, you'll try to hide it and not get the education neccesary to not accidentally blow up their aunt.
If someone won't be accepted no matter what they do, they are easily recruitable be cults and similar very nasty and actually dangerous groups.
If all magic is equally bad and dangerous, then why not reach for the forbidden yet powerful Dhar? It's not like they can doublekill you for it.
Some credit should be given to her parents in that this is a world of magic with a culture somewhere around... 12'th century Europe (with a lot of anachronisms). Superstitions around Trolls, Fay, Changelings, Demons, and so forth, lived on well into the 19'th century in the real world, and theirs is a world of literal magic. There's a lot of different ways her parents could have rationalized away that she wasn't their daughter anymore, or possibly that she never was their daughter.
They likely loved her up to that point, and likely grieved over her, but once she showed magic she was a threat.
There are numerous examples in Canon of families hiding and helping their children when they discover them to be mages, or even worse, mutants, because despite all the fear, superstition, and religious fanaticism they were still their children and they loved them as such...Huh, that changeling mention is a good point actually. From the parents POV, it might not have been that they stood aside to let their daughter be burned, but rather that their daughter was some time in the past, perhaps mere days or perhaps years ago, either possessed or swapped out with some demon that doubtlessly killed their real daughter, and the only reason they didn't help build the pyre is because they couldn't bare to do so with the monster still wearing their daughters face.
Those sorts of myths I can definitely see becoming a thing as a sort of coping mechanism for families who have had to go through with this. Of course you didn't kill your daughter, your daughter was already dead, killed by the thing you burned. It was righteous justice and vengeance for your daughter! And so the idea and myth propagates, so much more comforting than the truth for those grieving families, until it's a centuries old, full blown cultural myth.
It's dark enough I can see it fitting with canon to be honest.
Man, this is not WH40K, unlike psykers if a child is discovered to have magic by the Empire´s authorities they don´t kill him by default, once they are confirmed to not be corrupted by chaos they simply send them to the Colleges...More law abiding parents would send them off to the authorities, and what tends to happen THEN is execution by pyre.
That typically varies from witch hunter to witch hunter in canon. Like, sometimes they won't kill them, but sometimes they will. And it depends entirely on the personality and prejudices of the person making the call.Man, this is not WH40K, unlike psykers if a child is discovered to have magic by the Empire´s authorities they don´t kill him by default, once they are confirmed to not be corrupted by chaos they simply send them to the Colleges...
As Boney has said numerous times Witch Hunters are NOT the Inquisition
Only for the past 100 or so years, as established by Magnus the Pious after Great War against Chaos. Before that, all wizards were burned. You could see how rural areas with little connection to the more cosmopolitan parts of Empire would still hold to the old ways.Man, this is not WH40K, unlike psykers if a child is discovered to have magic by the Empire´s authorities they don´t kill him by default, once they are confirmed to not be corrupted by chaos they simply send them to the Colleges...
In Mathilde's backstory she was handed over to the legitimate local authority, the headman, who was all ready to burn her anyways.Man, this is not WH40K, unlike psykers if a child is discovered to have magic by the Empire´s authorities they don´t kill him by default, once they are confirmed to not be corrupted by chaos they simply send them to the Colleges...
As Boney has said numerous times Witch Hunters are NOT the Inquisition
Given Mathilde managed to collaborate up a weapon that burns souls they probably could doublekill someone if sufficiently motivated.If all magic is equally bad and dangerous, then why not reach for the forbidden yet powerful Dhar? It's not like they can doublekill you for it.
Technically it burns the connection between body and soul, not the soul itself. Gazul could probably do the latter, but in most cases it doesn't really sound necessary.Given Mathilde managed to collaborate up a weapon that burns souls they probably could doublekill someone if sufficiently motivated.
Random thought, could we clear a case of possession by that method in case we find a safe way to manage the subject?Technically it burns the connection between body and soul, not the soul itself. Gazul could probably do the latter, but in most cases it doesn't really sound necessary.
I'm not sure what the distinction would be, seeing as how the body gets dusted either way. If you set a chair on fire there won't be anybody sitting in it, but I don't see how it would help you figure out the identity of something that had been.Random thought, could we clear a case of possession by that method in case we find a safe way to manage the subject?
My guess is "Yes, but it will also kill them". Mind, that could still be a massive improvement, because at least the possesed doesn't get their soul dragged off to hell.Random thought, could we clear a case of possession by that method in case we find a safe way to manage the subject?
And here we ironically see one of those cultural myths propagating and exaggerating itself in modern times, as an insufficient or exaggerated basis morphs into being supposedly entirely baseless.
...would you like to elaborate, for the record, on how you think school segregation wasn't entirely without legitimate basis?
Like, that's certainly one hell of a take.
You need to reread that bit. What happened was that the villagers were getting ready to burn Mathilde when the village lawman stepped in and saved her. Her parents appear to have been of the opinion that she was dead to them.In Mathilde's backstory she was handed over to the legitimate local authority, the headman, who was all ready to burn her anyways.
Remember feudal. The people implementing the laws have a lot of leeway, basically no oversight, and are not all that educated. Witch Hunters are supposed to work with the Colleges on this, but in the far flung hinterlands of the Empire nobody knows whats going on, and most of the time the person making the call had only their grandmothers' tales to go on.
Not so. Veekie is saying that the uh. Mayor, or Headman, because calling someone from village so tiny Mayor is just hilarious, was the one that led her to the pyre. He was technically the authority of the village. You are probably correct that the lawman was the actual imperial authority there, as i doubt Imperial bureaucracy names village leaders thought.You need to reread that bit. What happened was that the villagers were getting ready to burn Mathilde when the village lawman stepped in and saved her. Her parents appear to have been of the opinion that she was dead to them.
the text clearly described the lawman as the only man that served as law enforcement.Not so. Veekie is saying that the uh. Mayor, or Headman, because calling someone from village so tiny Mayor is just hilarious, was the one that led her to the pyre. He was technically the authority of the village. You are probably correct that the lawman was the actual imperial authority there, as i doubt Imperial bureaucracy names village leaders thought.
I pretty sure the headman is the official leader of the village in every way that counts, whether or not he was appointed externally or chosen by the village in some manner. Each time Mathilde went to a village for official business, she talked to the headman as as the official business person. And at it's core, being considered the official business person is what makes someone an official business person.the text clearly described the lawman as the only man that served as law enforcement.
Headman was likely the unofficial village leader.
the lawman also sounds like a veteran to me in the text.
Judging by this, we are going to come into contact with them at some point in the future whether it be intentionally or the situation at Karak Norn goes badly. If they don't shoot us on sight for being the representative of a dwarven king, I can see them being treating us with barely contained disdain and little respect. That is unless we kill some noticeable Beastmen with the coin set on The Protector.Karak Norn's gates, unlike most Dwarfholds, are not found at the base of a mountain, but instead atop a massive forested plateau, upon which the last known Wutroth grove can be found. Where other Dwarves see wood as only useful for ornamentation or fuel, Karak Norn's Carpenters Guild are unquestionably the masters of creating wooden weapons, including bolt throwers, grudge throwers, and crossbows. They keep a wary eye on the Elves of Athel Loren, and not just out of caution, for they regularly carry out raids into the infamous forests to harvest the rarest, strongest and most valuable of woods from it. They spend a great deal of the profits on importing siege weapons from the rest of Karaz Ankor, quite sure that one day, Athel Loren will seek revenge.
Wood Elves have taken isolationism and turned it into an artform, and that's in comparison to the other Elves out there. The only practical way of approaching them would be the same as we did with the Skaven, taking a prisoner.