- Location
- Greece
The full quote of 'no metaphysical fishhooks' was this:
Now, certainly you could argue that the belt only stops somebody from pushing us down the road, and once we're on it by our own means it'll stop working, but that's really just not how I see it being implemented, both in terms of mechanics and thematics.
Because if the voters start voting for Mathilde to go little bits deeper and deeper that way, questor/character verisimilitude is something that will absolutely have to be maintained in order for it to be a good and interesting story, and I don't see that happening if Dhar pushes us further into monstrous evil than the questors happen to be. BoneyM doesn't usually infect the actual readers with black magic, so they've only got metaphorical corruption left, and keeping the mindsets of us and our character together is something I think is pretty important; the belt is just an explanation for how they would going to go about doing that, if we turned to evil and badness.
I agree, which is why I was careful to never state that the belt would actually work that way.
The thing I disagreed with was that, if it would work that way, it would be a scenario where the belt was basically a useless trinket that did nothing, as your quote ('yeah, you can juggle warpstone and hug daemons, but if you do so you actually can't, lol'. ) implied. I merely felt that such quote misrepresented the other side's argument, and that a misrepresentation, even an accidental and logical one, would harm the discussion. I did not, however, disagree because I thought that your overall conclusion is wrong, as I actually agree with it..
Last edited: