On the topic of the vote: I honestly thought that three different mystery boxes and the components of future artefacts would utterly demolish a voucher for Imperial back-pats and a merchant hit-list. I won't always get it right and not every vote will turn into a down-to-the-wire knife-fight.
@BoneyM
I have some thoughts on the matter of pitting multiple mystery boxes against multiple other more conventional rewards (favor, gold, resources, artifacts, etc, etc). In general, I think that there is always going to be a significant proportion of voters who are unlikely to choose a Mystery Box over a conventional option. Meanwhile, there usually isn't a similar contingent of voters rallying against conventional options with seemingly clearly defined rewards. The main reason for this is that the larger the voter base becomes, the more likely it is that the tendency of voters towards risk aversion becomes increasingly pronounced - for one, convincing voters to take risk is easier when participants are fewer because arguments for risk are less likely to be drowned over the sheer pace of the discussion. And because Mystery Boxes are always "risky" and "uncertain", this means that Mystery Boxes always have to contend with this uncertainty, which means
it is very unlikely a thread will ever achieve consensus in privileging a Mystery Box over well-designed conventional options. If I recall correctly, the most recent Avatar trait won with a plurality, not a majority, and the closely fought vote attests to the salience of uncertainty of benefits when Mystery Boxes are in play.
Now, if there was only one Mystery Box, as was the case when the
Avatar trait was offered at the end of the Karak Eight Peaks Expedition, Mystery Box advocates usually are able to rally enough voters behind that single Mystery Box, to give that Mystery Box a reasonable chance of winning. This ironically creates a certain bias in the vote - because there are many more conventional options to a single Mystery Box, most pro-Mystery Box voters who have more of an appetite to take a plunge into potentially unique rewards tend to rally behind that single Mystery Box, and that is often enough to create a tightly contested vote where the Mystery Box has a chance of winning. But it also means that a second conventional option is often left out in the cold.
When there are multiple Mystery Boxes in play, however, the odds of a Mystery Box winning drops significantly, because the debate over the Mystery Box splits into two very confusing levels that make for messy discussions that usually don't get resolved early within the first few hours of a vote:
1. Should a Mystery Box be chosen in the first place?
2. If so, which Mystery Box should be chosen over others, and why?
What then tends to happen then, is that all Mystery Box options tend to fall far behind. The already limited voter base for a Mystery Box becomes split across the multiple Mystery Boxes. While, some may approval vote all Mystery Boxes on consideration of the first question, just as many are likely to be very concerned about the second question. Now, it might be nice if all Mystery Box voters can be convinced to rally behind one Mystery Box. And in a smaller quest, this is probably much more achievable, because the quest both moves slower and there are fewer people to convince, coordinate and consolidate. But in a very large quest such as this, the odds of such a consolidation happening falls dramatically, because of just how hard it is to build a coalition between 100 plus voters to go for one option over the other two or three (the three mystery Boxes in the current vote have 144 votes between them right now).
It also doesn't lead for particularly interesting debates, because a lot of these Mystery Box debates basically boils down to rolling the Gatcha for something fun and unique versus going for much more concretized rewards; rather than actually debating and speculating on the unique merits between multiple Mystery Boxes. I don't personally think that relitigating the Avatar vs Dispel debate again with every Mystery Box vote is necessarily going to fun or healthy discussions, given how repetitive such debates are, but in my view, this has more or less been the tone of this vote.
In short, if you throw multiple Mystery boxes in play against conventional options, chances are very high that whatever fun stuff you are embedding in these options is going to be passed over, and it's going to happen on very repetitive argumentation lines. Maybe the next vote might play out differently. Maybe voters inclined to Mystery Boxes to begin with might rally behind a single Mystery box the next time you throw multiple Mystery Boxes in the arena early on. I personally think it's unlikely though, because rallying behind a single Mystery Box is always going to take
time.
Now, I think you should
keep offering multiple Mystery Boxes. There is a potential for very fun debates to be had there. But I think if you want those fun debates to happen on the unique merits of a Mystery Box, rather than on the
premise of a Mystery Box itself, the best option would be to
firewall multiple Mystery Boxes from conventional options. In other words, split the Multiple Mystery Boxes into a separate reward pool from non-Mystery Box options. A future vote might look like this:
1. Regular Rewards: Choose normal traits from the following list of possible traits. The two highest votes will win.
2. Bonus Rewards: Choose a Mystery Box reward from the following list of Mystery Box. The Mystery Box with the highest votes will win.
That way, I think it makes it so that the debate becomes significantly more interesting because we move on from the level of Mystery Box good or Mystery Box bad, to which of these three or four mystery boxes on offer, we ought to choose. These are just some thoughts and suggestions on running Multiple Mystery Box votes in the future. I don't know for sure whether future Mystery Boxes votes will play out the way I've described, but if they do, I think that Firewalling Mystery Boxes is one of the methods to make a Multiple Mystery Box vote an interesting, tight contest as opposed to a landslide built on risk aversion, which seems to have happened this time around.
Finally, congratulations on reaching the 300 vote count mark! Onwards to 400. Thanks for running this amazingly engaging quest!