- Location
- The internet
[X] Armor of von Tarnus
I'm not very familar with the wider WF troop composition. Are Pegasus, Griffions, and other types of flying beasts not used in other military services throughout the empire?
They're hero-level steeds. So there exist flying knights within the empire, but it's hard to call it a 'recruitment pool' when it comprises frontline commanders, high nobility, and wizards. You need something along the lines of a Great Deed to get a griffin, not just put in your time with a local knightly order.I'm not very familar with the wider WF troop composition. Are Pegasus, Griffions, and other types of flying beasts not used in other military services throughout the empire?
Bretonnia has Pegasus Knights, but I gather they aren't common enough in the Empire to form full military units with, like, established doctrine and such (though Wizards will occasionally buy one and use it as a flying mount if they aren't Dawongr enough to have a gyrocarriage or awesome enough to have Wolf). And Griffons are extremely not mass-producible as mounts: heroes and lords might have them as one-offs, but they are very hard to capture young enough to tame and even harder to actually tame, so there's no way anyone can assemble enough riders to form a unit of Griffonry.I'm not very familar with the wider WF troop composition. Are Pegasus, Griffions, and other types of flying beasts not used in other military services throughout the empire?
That answers my question. I see. I see....They're hero-level steeds. So there exist flying knights within the empire, but it's hard to call it a 'recruitment pool' when it comprises frontline commanders, high nobility, and wizards. You need something along the lines of a Great Deed to get a griffin, not just put in your time with a local knightly order.
Monstrous cavalry within the Empire is currently more along the lines of demigryphs, who are land-bound.
The most 'doable' mass monstrous cavalry that can fly would be Hippogriffs, since those only have a requirement of the knight that will ride them raising them from the moment they hatch and imprint on them. The reason the Empire hasn't done this is because most of their habitats are on the Bretonnian side of the Grey Mountains. And, y'know, Bretonnian knights usually want hippogriff mounts, too.
Pretty confident that Bretonnia has a lot more Pegasi than Hippogriffs.The most 'doable' mass monstrous cavalry that can fly would be Hippogriffs, since those only have a requirement of the knight that will ride them raising them from the moment they hatch and imprint on them. The reason the Empire hasn't done this is because most of their habitats are on the Bretonnian side of the Grey Mountains. And, y'know, Bretonnian knights usually want hippogriff mounts, too.
As far as I can remember we have approached danger based on a risk/reward basis. E.g. the okral rescue. Thus the armour will allow us to either go for bigger rewards for similar danger level or else drop the danger for similar rewards.Yes and because we will have it we will get into more fights, thus offsetting some of the safety it offers.
If we were already getting into every conceivable fight we could there would be no offset.
They do, but that's got more to do with there being a lot more Pegasi than there are Hippogriffs (namely, because the most common interaction between two adult Hippogriffs that encounter each other in the wild is to try to eat the other).Pretty confident that Bretonnia has a lot more Pegasi than Hippogriffs.
If we end up facing an opponent who outclasses us badly, I'd prefer to do that from aboard a huge mobile base full of cannon, offensive and defensive enchantments, and backupIf we end up facing an opponent who is beyond the armour (e.g. the everchosen, Malekith etc.) I don't think the presence or lack thereof of the armour would change things, and I would rather have the armour so that we are more likely to escape.
Not the actual silk, unfortunately. The armor slot gets one piece, and if we pick up Armor of von Tarnus, it's gonna be Armor of von Tarnus, which has the properties it has, including being able to stack with a cast of AA.While i very much dislike the armor option.
The armor does s tack with aethyric armor.
Not sure if it stacks with the actual silk though...
As far as I can remember we have approached danger based on a risk/reward basis. E.g. the okral rescue. Thus the armour will allow us to either go for bigger rewards for similar danger level or else drop the danger for similar rewards.
This means that the armour will help enable us to do more with the expected level of risk, or else be straight-up safer. Both of these are benefits the armour offers.
If we end up facing an opponent who is beyond the armour (e.g. the everchosen, Malekith etc.) I don't think the presence or lack thereof of the armour would change things, and I would rather have the armour so that we are more likely to escape.
Though if we take the armor of Van Tarnus, we might be able to study it and the elf crown and the enchantment on the waystone foundation and up our enchanting capability to the point we could recreate some of it with gromril.Not the actual silk, unfortunately. The armor slot gets one piece, and if we pick up Armor of von Tarnus, it's gonna be Armor of von Tarnus, which has the properties it has, including being able to stack with a cast of AA.
I'm not seeing how that would lead to Hippogriff cavalry being more viable than pegasus cavalry?They do, but that's got more to do with there being a lot more Pegasi than there are Hippogriffs (namely, because the most common interaction between two adult Hippogriffs that encounter each other in the wild is to try to eat the other).
I genuinely do not get what this has to do with my original point i.e. the better we are at fighting and surviving fights the more and harder we will fights. It is a very limited argument that has to do with how we treat risk in the face of offsets.
For the sake of hopefully ending this before it gets repetitive:
- There exists an enemy, lets call him Jim the Example Enemy, who we would have fought both with the armor and without it, in that situation we are just plain safer from having it
- There exists a second enemy, lets call her Sally the Example Enemy, who we would not have fought without the armor but who we will fight with the armor. In this instance the presence of the armor translates not into more safety but more potential reward
Though if we take the armor of Van Tarnus, we might be able to study it and the elf crown and the enchantment on the waystone foundation and up our enchanting capability to the point we could recreate some of it with gromril.
It's strange how rarely we explore Mathilde's knack for enchantment.