Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
Checking someone is ok with you taking a course of action that could cause them a ton of trouble if it goes wrong is not "unthinking submission"

Don't go ask the member of a club if he's cool with you taking candid shots of other club members, it puts them in an awkward position regardless of whether they're cool with it or not.

In fact asking them and forcing them to make a call isn't exactly what I would say is being a good friend.

Like Chaos gods, yes.
Guess which gods we won't be poking, out of fear of corruption/drawing their immense(ly hostile) attention?

Also like the tons of other proscribed cults that also exist and cause trouble, often because they're hard to identify from another sect.
 
Last edited:
Haven't gotten through the entire thread since the update yet, but here's my thoughts.

Truth feels like if we go truth we will probably find out a bunch of cool stuff, but it is knowledge that would be very difficult to share, due to the whole blasphemy thing.

OTOH while we're not likely to get knowledge of the same depth with faith, I remain hopeful that the gods would not throw away a potentially useful tool, and at least some would be willing to work with us on it. For instance, I suspect Shallya might be interested in allowing more healing miracles to take place, if AV were provided to people who are already trusted priests. Now, I don't suspect all God's would be fine with this, but I suspect that by partnering with the gods that are willing we will get results that are more widely usable.

Plus faith seems more in line with our WEBMAT mission, which is collaboration between wizards and priests. Note that we went for collaboration, not surreptitious secret theft; we want them to be willing participants. With the faith option, we might be able to use AV to get a spellcasting priest on staff if we find a willing god.
 
Studying Gods would only start with our own because they are safer and easier. There are high potential rewards (and risks, but risks are fun to read about) in studying the not-so-good Gods as well.

Plus, if our Gods are good, why not add a few more? The status quo is not actually very great. The forces of order are regularly threatened by the forces of Chaos, and even the 'peaceful' times aren't actually all that nice to live in.
 
Checking someone is ok with you taking a course of action that could cause them a ton of trouble if it goes wrong is not "unthinking submission"

I mean, Ranald set up Heidi as Empress without telling us nothing at all and it could have caused a great deal of trouble for us.

When we discovered it (mind you not because he told us to) we should have reported that to the Grey College, yet we didn't because Ranald is our friend and we trust him not to fuck it up. I just expect Ranald to do the same if the situation is reversed.
 
Last edited:
Having now caught up... can some of the more 'throw everything at the wall to see what sticks' and 'you MUST vote this, otherwise [insert perceived failing here]' arguments please just... stop? At this point, there are a few people on BOTH sides who are doing far more to convince me to vote against their preference than for it.
 
It if you decide to do what they want before even hearing them out, it is submitting yourself to their will before they have even given an argument.
Ok sure, but by that definition I have unthinking submission toward all of my friends and family as they do to me (at least I hope so) so yes unthinking submission is a sign of friendship.
 
This is sorta the thing you do with friends about investigating something deeply personal you know they might not like: Ask them if it's okay first.

Ah yes something deeply personal... which is to say the workings of their species in general. Tell me does Ranald check with us before doing anything linked to humanity? Me thinks this friendship is deeply unequal... almost like it is something else.

Honestly I have to struggle not do dislike Ranald when i hear stuff like this, the only thing that keeps me from it is that he never claimed to be a friend, that was Mathilde deluding herself.
 
How is it screwing around with him? The issue is posters have come up with a mindset for why this is a "betrayal" that doesn't to me at all match the character of Ranald or the in quest guidelines He's given us.
It's a betrayal in the same way that investigating a friends deep past without asking is. Is stealing your friends DNA to run a 23andMe on them ethical? If you say yes, I don't want you as a friend, at the very least. It's why consent is important in medical experiments, and we quite simply aren't asking for consent. It's gross.

Ah yes something deeply personal... which is to say the workings of their species in general. Tell me does Ranald check with us before doing anything linked to humanity? Me thinks this friendship is deeply unequal... almost like it is something else.

Honestly I have to struggle not do dislike Ranald when i hear stuff like this, the only thing that keeps me from it is that he never claimed to be a friend, that was Mathilde deluding herself.
Look, if you hate Ranald so much, just go out and say it. He has never done anything bad to us and saved our life a number of times, including against Khorne. Clearly that's a sign of an asshole who's just using us.
 
Last edited:
[X] Truth
I get the feeling Ranald would be the sort of god fine with both massively upending the god-man relationship and with a follower sacrificing such a radical conceit in his name; is probably why he didn't smack us down to begin with...
 
Last edited:
It's a betrayal in the same way that investigating a friends deep past without asking is. Is stealing your friends DNA to run a 23andMe on them ethical? If you say yes, I don't want you as a friend, at the very least. It's why consent is important in medical experiments, and we quite simply aren't asking for consent. It's gross.

In this case the betrayal of Ranald has already happened (Though frankly I disagree with the way you characterize it) . We don't have to ever intentionally involve his "DNA" in any further investigations. But due to the way the vote is structured if we ever want to take a swab of a crime scene to see if we can figure out the culprit we need to vote truth.
 
Last edited:
Ok sure, but by that definition I have unthinking submission toward all of my friends and family as they do to me (at least I hope so) so yes unthinking submission is a sign of friendship.
He didn't ask us even when we got declared dwarf because of his manipulations.

That was far more intrusive than what we have done. More to point his part of this experiment is over. We are talking about other gods now.
 
We are as much a friend to ranald as a cat is to its owner. The owner is not going to tell the cat when he kicks another and the cat does not tell the owner when it bites another man hand.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top