- Location
- Under your bed
Or we could start by getting the colleges a vote
Iä! Iä! Boney Fhtagn!
That would destroy any hope of neutrality for the Colleges. They're supposed to serve the Empire, not rule it.
same could be said for the "make her the next emperor" joke floating aroundThat would destroy any hope of neutrality for the Colleges. They're supposed to serve the Empire, not rule it.
I don't think there's any rule saying the two need to be mutually exclusive...That would destroy any hope of neutrality for the Colleges. They're supposed to serve the Empire, not rule it.
Which is why instead of getting Mathilde elected we get her Eastalian cousin Juantilde Weber elected instead. Weirdly, no-one has ever seen the two of them in a room together but Mathilde speaks very highly of him and he does have a most impressive mustache.same could be said for the "make her the next emperor" joke floating around
Becoming Emperor requires 10 votes. 2/3rds majority and all that.
Becoming Emperor requires 10 votes. 2/3rds majority and all that.
In the first election after Luitpold died Karl got four votes and Boris Todbringer had eight, the remaining three abstained but Boris did not win because he needed at least ten votes.Source on this? As far as I know the electoral procedures aren't actually detailed anywhere.
As SpaceSloth says, it's from Prince of Altdorf by Andy Hall. It's the only source I've ever seen for how being elected actually works, so I run with it.Source on this? As far as I know the electoral procedures aren't actually detailed anywhere.
In the first election after Luitpold died Karl got four votes and Boris Todbringer had eight, the remaining three abstained but Boris did not win because he needed at least ten votes.
The wiki says that it is from short story The Prince of Altdorf
As SpaceSloth says, it's from Prince of Altdorf by Andy Hall. It's the only source I've ever seen for how being elected actually works, so I run with it.
Those free ebooks are lore dense.Of course that information is tucked away in a free ebook that was released with Total Warhammer a year after the setting was detonated. It's the first place I should have looked.
obviously, really, it's all your fault for only doing a ridiculous level of lore research.Of course that information is tucked away in a free ebook that was released with Total Warhammer a year after the setting was detonated. It's the first place I should have looked.
Well, at least you learned it now, instead of ten or so turns from now after settling on a plan?Of course that information is tucked away in a free ebook that was released with Total Warhammer a year after the setting was detonated. It's the first place I should have looked.
After the whole Age of the Three Emperors debacle it seems weird that they'd stick with a 2/3rds majority, rather than going with a simple majority to avoid that happening again.Becoming Emperor requires 10 votes. 2/3rds majority and all that.
"Easier to elect an emperor" is one way to look at it, and that has is advantages. But just because you elected an emperor doesn't mean everyone accepts that emperor. You could easily have a case where someone with less votes has greater military power and just decides to redistribute some votes. Or in a less extreme case, you end up with an emperor who doesn't have enough power to actually be effective.After the whole Age of the Three Emperors debacle it seems weird that they'd stick with a 2/3rds majority, rather than going with a simple majority to avoid that happening again.
I guess either they're not all that attached to being an Empire or they're unwilling to change their imperial constitution.
Good point. I was thinking of interregnums as automatically problems, but an interregnum can actually be just fine for the Empire most of the time - the various departments can keep ticking on with their own leadership without an Emperor at the top."Easier to elect an emperor" is one way to look at it. But just because you elected an emperor doesn't mean everyone accepts that emperor. You could easily have a case where someone with less votes has greater military power and just decides to redistribute some votes. Or in a less extreme case, you end up with an emperor who doesn't have enough power to actually be effective.
Is the difference between 8 votes and 10 really that big?"Easier to elect an emperor" is one way to look at it, and that has it's advantages. But just because you elected an emperor doesn't mean everyone accepts that emperor. You could easily have a case where someone with less votes has greater military power and just decides to redistribute some votes. Or in a less extreme case, you end up with an emperor who doesn't have enough power to actually be effective.
Two thirds of the votes mostly guarantees the new emperor can make it stick, and that they've got enough support to actually govern, and aren't widely hated. You just need to reach that point. It's a trade-off.
Is the difference between 8 votes and 10 really that big?
Say, if the two votes difference were Hochland and Stirland, would that deter any opposition willing to make himself counter-Emperor against a majority that does not include these?
The problem with the Age wasn't the number of votes required, they elected an Emperor. The problem was the perception that the vote was rigged and the (then more powerful) split between the Cults of Ulric and Sigmar.After the whole Age of the Three Emperors debacle it seems weird that they'd stick with a 2/3rds majority, rather than going with a simple majority to avoid that happening again.
I guess either they're not all that attached to being an Empire or they're unwilling to change their imperial constitution.
At least it becomes a lot less likely.Seems pretty big to me. 8 vs 7 is close enough for people to start getting ideas. 10 vs 5 really isn't.
First, each vote that switches sides not only means one less on your side, but also one more on theirs, effectively a difference of two. And the effect is nonlinear, because fighting on two fronts will be more than twice harder.Is the difference between 8 votes and 10 really that big?
Say, if the two votes difference were Hochland and Stirland, would that deter any opposition willing to make himself counter-Emperor against a majority that does not include these?
The needing 10 votes out of 15 thing realy exacerbates the advantage Reikland holds in the vote, with 4 votes locked in you either need to convince the Reikland to support you or else you need everyone else except for one vote. It also makes it impossible to win without the support of either Reikland or Middenland as between them they account for 6 votes.
Just because the EC of Reikland and the Sigmarites are likely allies does not make them certain allies in any vote.The needing 10 votes out of 15 thing really exacerbates the advantage Reikland holds in the vote, with 4 votes locked in you either need to convince the Reikland to support you or else you need everyone else except for one vote. It also makes it impossible to win without the support of either Reikland or Middenland as between them they account for 6 votes.