- Location
- United States
Something I feel like may have been lost in this argument somewhere is that we have tried to improve things, but we've really only been working on a local/regional level.Well at least you're honest with about your argument being about fear.
Fear of the enemy who you have not even argued an appeasement is possible for (even though we have done it multiple times and have even resisted bad faith actions on top of that).
Fear of the world turning worse (even though it has tried to do so multiple times and will try again and we have so far resisted such efforts with planning and luck).
Fear of an ally's unyielding nature even though Naraiel herself has spoken about how she is willing to yield to an argument if it holds true even for a human generation in the last two update. Even though she has intoxicated herself to be able to bend enough to try something that has been tried before because the people are new.
Fear of people turning worse next generation even though we have worked a lot of effort into making sure people are better than in the original timeline. Also the belief of inter-Empire diplomacy being a waste of time to a Wood Elf even though we have been told in the last two updates that Naraiel and her father saw it as an investment in time to save themselves the time and effort of two human generation in exchange for months of diplomatic meetings.
Fear of a bad political situation forcing realpolitik on us and as such curtailing our own ability to affect good actions. Even though historically at the peak of realpolitik stupidity people still got good things done.
Then on top of that you only use generalities like exceptional people in this setting (or for that matter in the real world) can't exists. Even though history remembers so many exceptional people that went beyond the norm to change the world for better/worse. Like doing enough good doesn't inspire at least some other people to try and do good. And some of them even succeed.
Then there is the implied logic in your argument of us doing nothing to mitigate the bad events and not being responsible stewards of our power even though players have been trying to mitigate bad events and responsibly steward our power since the start of the quest. We even succeed most of the time and go after the failures until they are at the very least mitigated.
Even after all the shit Naraiel has gotten from the Empire she is still willing to try Diplomacy even though her bar to get to that point qualifies as a skyscraper. This is an evolving situation and just going fuck it expect the worst so do the worst to our enemies before they do it to us is a bad idea.
Now does your argument(s) have something more to them than the logic of fearmongering?
Is Kislev better than it was in canon? Debatable, but it's certainly stronger.
Is the Northern Empire better than it was in canon? Absolutely, since we are bringing up from being the backwater of the Empire into a peer worth true consideration.
Is the Empire as a whole better off than in canon? I would say so, but that's because of Big Magnus just as much as anything else. And even then, most of the Empire's gains have been material more than anything else. The same foolhardy stubbornness that led to armies trying to conquer Laurelorn still exists, and we haven't done much at all to really impact that.
While Magnus absolutely would see value in allying with Laurelorn and keeping cordial relations, most people aren't Magnus. Most people aren't Freddy, or Stephan, or Ortrud, who will help people who are different from them instead of fearing and hating them. This applies especially for the Emperor, who in most situations is purposefully weak in power and will in order for the Electors to have free reign to do whatever they wish. I wouldn't trust the Emperor to keep even a non-aggression pact intact because of that alone.