Okay, commentary on things that have been said so far:
=======FUN STUFF=======
@Iron Wolf
Oh wow, the booze has
ethenol in it? That's gonna mess you up. Ethanol is the regular stuff; ethenol (otherwise known as vinyl alcohol) will fuck you up. Also, it has to be created through rather bizarre and exotic processes.
And... Good job with Eddie. He's an old redshirt. He knows all the subtle little ways to fight back. Because there are old redshirts, and their are naive redshirts. But there are no old, naive redshirts.
The new ship should have a Caitian name because they are joining right now.
I was thinking Niven? Due to the author who wrote for Trek and wrote Cat-peeps
Ugh, Niven is a jerk. In that one episode he basically took an SF short story he wrote for something totally different (admittedly a good one) and rewrote it for Star Trek. Let's pick something else.
Pssh, uncontrolled antimatter reactions are just how we split the saucer from the rest of the ship. It's perfectly safe.
I don't mind you splitting the saucer from the rest of the ship that way. I do mind the part where you're splitting the left side of the saucer from the
right side of the saucer with the same reaction...
Also, a trip from Earth to Venus shouldn't take 2 hours at warp one, which is 1c. Even if they're on opposite sides of the Sun, it should only take about half an hour (<15 min direct flight, but I'm giving some leeway for detour around Sun and any acceleration/deceleration).
Stop thinking efficiently and start thinking bureaucratically and red-tape-y.
The most likely thing lengthening the flight would be space traffic control restrictions on when you can go to warp and how close to an inhabited planet you can do so. You don't want a ship at warp passing close enough to a random civilian shuttle or navigational buoy to endanger it. So a certain amount of time must be spent at each end of the trip on impulse (or worse yet, thrusters) to get clear of the zone where warp travel is prohibited except to emergency response vessels or whatever.
Ibmaian said:
I have this head-canon that Vulcans are secretly jealous that the Federation's official exploratory/military arm adopted "primitive" and "reckless" United Earth's design and engineering methodologies.
I disagree with you. I don't think it's secret.
I'm still rooting for T'Rinta. We owe her after she got us a free Weapons Tech team, and I reiterate her bonus isn't bad. I'm not sure we want to replace Maryam with another former Explorer 1st Officer. Let's get in a fresh face and a fresh perspective.[/SPOILER]
I'm rooting for McAdams to nurse poor
Courageous back to health and take her out again, because that was her ship.
Then M'beki for
Miracht (because it'd be nice for Miracht to pass more diplomacy checks, and I want to fast-track Thuir for promotion).
And T'Rinta,
yes, but for
Surak, because putting Vulcans in charge of that ship is traditional, and I want to see if we can turn T'Rinta into a were-T'Lorel, only with torpedoes instead of phasers.
========BLAND STUFF=======
Each sector and border zone gets an Excelsior, either a Rennaissance or a ConniBee, and a couple of centaur/miranda/constellation-A's to fill out the defense recs. Border Zones get more, of course. Keplers or whatever we end up calling them are sent wherever we need to do research, and Ambassadors are (for now) the exclusive province of the explorer corps.
I should note that I question whether the "rapid response" and "anchor" roles are actually different, in that a ship which is good at one role is good at the other, and ships responsible for the same roles must be assigned to the same place at the same time. But that is a largely irrelevant detail.
...Okay, how often does the Captain of a ship say 'Well, we're in a big hurry. Warp 9 sounds good.'
I can EASILY see why the engineers would have adopted that scale.
Not when they're working with other people who are NOT scientific and technical illiterates, they don't. And Starfleet captains aren't fools either, and they do know basic math and science. And even when we
are talking about technical experts dealing with random outsiders, the numbers
the experts themselves use to measure things need to make sense and be accurate, or things just fall apart. You get stuff like the
Mars Climate Orbiter mishap when people use numbers that do not clearly, accurately communicate a concept.
Why not something similar to the Lorenz factor, based on some new warp physics they discovered during the transwarp experiment, which their previous equations were only an approximation for, similar to Newtonian mechanics are for Relativity?
Thing is, the Lorenz factor
always means the same thing. A Lorenz factor of two means certain things, physically significant things we care about like momentum, are multiplied by two. But Lorenz factors of a thousand
also mean those same things are multiplied by a thousand.
Lorenz factors are always calculated the same way, and always mean the same things. Lorenz factors are consistent. TNG-style warp factors aren't.
They're a straightforward measure of how fast you are going (or rather, the 3/10th power of how fast you are going). Until suddenly they're NOT, and they start following a bizarre, patternless 'pattern' that is allegedly exponential or asymptotic but in fact represents some random bozo hand-sketching a curve on a graph at behest of another bozo.