Briefvoice's version is more comprehensive because he's been selectively editing his plan on the fly for two hours or so after the main opposition to his plan went to bed.
And as a note to everyone who thinks me suggesting an alternative plan would be a good idea, and might draw more voters, please note that only one person has come forward favoring my plan. Meanwhile, we have explicit tactical voting against the blockade idea, making it very imprudent for me to abandon support for a pretty good blockade plan in favor of one I think is a bit more refined.
Furthermore, @OneirosTheWriter has declared his intent to close the vote as soon as he wakes up, in which case it may be impossible for us to resolve this issue before that happens. Because @AKuz may not actually wake up before the vote closes, and is in no position to amend her plan as the evolving discussion unfolds and casts new light on the details of the blockade strategy.
Basically, I think the situation is very unequal in that the blockade strategy is committed to a static plan that can be nitpicked to death and cannot be amended to address people's concerns. Whereas the anti-blockade strategy is being steadily revised and updated to be increasingly appealing to all and sundry.
@OneirosTheWriter, I would really like to get a Betazoid xenopsychology team, and have the Vulcan Science Academy pick up a different specialization. As it stands the Vulcan Science Academy is redundant with Spock. And while we may at some future date lose Spock and need a new xenopsych researcher, I literally can't think of any species in the Federation more qualified to comment on xenopsych than the Betazoids.
Only if I create a new vote plan and split the vote, which I am reluctant to do now that the anti-blockade wing has started voting tactically.Sure, but there's nothing preventing you from incorporating those details into your vote plan.
Well, at the moment the Vulcan Science Academy and Spock are exact duplicate tech teams, which is just... aesthetically problematic. And it makes more sense to have Betazoids than Vulcans as our xenopsych experts anyway, given that Betazoids are powerful long-range empaths and telepaths, while Vulcans are constantly in this sort of weird detached state of pointing out how illogical everyone else is.I wouldn't mind not getting a free xenopsychology research team, as long as there is an option to purchase one in the next snakepit.Eh, don't be so defeatist. There's every possibility that either Oneiros will delay vote closure or that AKuz wakes up and adopts newer aspects of your vote into hers.
Also don't think we should change any existing specializations - there are plenty of enough branches in the same research category to research simultaneously now.
I agree, and we can always put the starbase up around Betazed a year or three down the line.One point about putting a Starbase in the RBZ instead of Betazoid - we're on a timer for how long we can drop one there, before it becomes an irritant to the Romulans for doing so. Betazoid has no such limiter. And, in regards to starships, a +5 stationary defense really doesn't matter where we put it - as a matter of fact, never mind. With the D3 in Betazoid, it's overkill. We can free up more ships, or at least more potent ships, by dropping it in the RBZ.
I could certainly go for doing RBZ Starbase this year, Betazed next one given the timer. I do want it eventually.One point about putting a Starbase in the RBZ instead of Betazoid - we're on a timer for how long we can drop one there, before it becomes an irritant to the Romulans for doing so. Betazoid has no such limiter. And, in regards to starships, a +5 stationary defense really doesn't matter where we put it - as a matter of fact, never mind. With the D3 in Betazoid, it's overkill. We can free up more ships, or at least more potent ships, by dropping it in the RBZ.
Not hate, but I don't feel comfortable with any of the plans suggested so far. If I knew exactly why I would suggest changes or propose a plan myself, but I don't. I just keep hoping for something better to be suggested. People hinting at possible other plans but instead resorting to tactical voting is really annoying me at the moment.You yourself don't seem to have voted for any plans, at least per your own tally. Can't decide? Hate them all?
Not hate, but I don't feel comfortable with any of the plans suggested so far. If I knew exactly why I would suggest changes or propose a plan myself, but I don't. I just keep hoping for something better to be suggested. People hinting at possible other plans but instead resorting to tactical voting is really annoying me at the moment.