We bought that one the instant it appeared.
No we didn't. We found it in the last Captains log so its still unclaimed.
Except we are considering that already because of large freighters, and how cheap 2mt berths are at UP.
If the Rennie had been a 1.5mt design, how many would we have now? Given that we would have had to either stop maximum Excelsior production, or spend a bunch of PP on upsized berths - and what would you have sacrificed to get that PP?

Yes, we are strongly considering our first 2mt berth now - but we certainly didn't want any 7 game years.
We had the option to buy a 2 MT Berth for cheap and didn't take it. And now look at where we are and what we are talking about. Next snakepit is going to be a doozy.
Keplers. We want so many Keplers you can walk from San Fran Yards to UP Yards without needing a spacesuit.
If we could manage that the Cardassians and the rest of our enemies Current and future wouldn't stand a chance against us.
Before or after we re-invent the doors?
Lets plan for after we invent the doors shall we.
 
Keplers. We want so many Keplers you can walk from San Fran Yards to UP Yards without needing a spacesuit.

Enough keplars that we can retire our tech teams because Kepler swarms can just science the shit out of anything?

BTW I also got an answer about the HIP, confirmed to not affect aux or member yards.
 
Last edited:
*Notes that technology keeps moving forward, and that for even the Keplers, their time will pass.*
 
AAAAAAAAAAARGH!~

Can't stop thinking about stupid things.

Like how TBG event and questchain would look in Timelines.
 
... Trade some to the ISC, in about 10 years?

I don't think so. We still don't know much of anything about the ISC, and they are probably pretty paranoid about letting us find out more. And we don't give some of our best ships to a rival major power we know nothing about.

The only way i'd agree to giving them some Keplers is if they affiliate themselves to us, and i suspect that is just not happening.
 
Please explain

[Interest Intensifies]
Think KanColle or other shitton of collectible games, only Startrek. Present on Steam.

FTP is truly FTP and PTW is not annoying (yet... for me), prices are totally bullshit but I'm going full FTP anyway.

PS. Or if you mean event and questchain... I suck at it. Which causes like 75% of frustration about not being able to stop.
 
Last edited:
I don't think so. We still don't know much of anything about the ISC, and they are probably pretty paranoid about letting us find out more. And we don't give some of our best ships to a rival major power we know nothing about.

The only way i'd agree to giving them some Keplers is if they affiliate themselves to us, and i suspect that is just not happening.
1) Ten years.
2) They seem to have contact to the Horizon(?), and with the Cardassians (soon at least). Between those two, we should like a really good option to strengthen defenses. Because I think we will allow "tourists" to tour the Federation.
 
1) Ten years.
2) They seem to have contact to the Horizon(?), and with the Cardassians (soon at least). Between those two, we should like a really good option to strengthen defenses. Because I think we will allow "tourists" to tour the Federation.

I'd put it this way. Don't give anything to the ISC you wouldn't feel comfortable with the Klingons, the Romulans, or the Ferengi getting their hands on. Now, and the answer won't change ten years unless they do something that really demonstrates they intend to be a permanent long term ally of the Federation.

Yeah, it's nice that the ISC seems pretty positive and democratic and non-terrible, but democratic ideals are no guarantee a power will be on our side in any war.... just ask the Yrillians.
 
I'd put it this way. Don't give anything to the ISC you wouldn't feel comfortable with the Klingons, the Romulans, or the Ferengi getting their hands on. Now, and the answer won't change ten years unless they do something that really demonstrates they intend to be a permanent long term ally of the Federation.

Yeah, it's nice that the ISC seems pretty positive and democratic and non-terrible, but democratic ideals are no guarantee a power will be on our side in any war.... just ask the Yrillians.
The ten years were also meant as a period to get to know each other.
 
The ISC is cautious as fuck.

They're about as likely to shoot first as we are because they're not interested spending forces fighting people they don't need to fight when they might need them to stop ANOTHER doomsday level threat.
 
The ISC is cautious as fuck.

They're about as likely to shoot first as we are because they're not interested spending forces fighting people they don't need to fight when they might need them to stop ANOTHER doomsday level threat.

I don't agree. Their experience has taught them that sooner or later everyone is people they need to fight, so shooting first is only good sense. Shooting first and shooting last is best of all.
 
They didn't shoot first when we met them, so we can rule out that assumption.

I get the feeling they came very, very close. It's notable they only relaxed around the Courageous after it helped them shoot someone else. I mean, who does that... invite a new First Contact to participate in a combat action against some of your own internal pirates? That was some Klingon-level shit right there.
 
I get the feeling they came very, very close. It's notable they only relaxed around the Courageous after it helped them shoot someone else. I mean, who does that... invite a new First Contact to participate in a combat action against some of your own internal pirates? That was some Klingon-level shit right there.
Except that's not what happened? That was a different update?
 
Last edited:
Okay, I'd like to move that we abstain from making assertions about the ISC being trigger-happy, like "they believe they should always shoot first" or whatever. There is very close to zero direct evidence on their behavior from Oneiros, of any kind whatsoever.

The evidence we've seen does not strongly support the belief that the ISC is likely to attack us without cause. On the other hand, the evidence we've seen doesn't rule out the possibility of the ISC believing it has cause, at a time when we would not see things that way.

But in either case, the only people who are remotely qualified to tell us how the ISC thinks are the three posters who collaborated to develop it, and Oneiros who has final say on how much of their work gets integrated into the game.

The rest of us should restrict ourselves to speculation, and admit that we are speculating, rather than say that the ISC are stupidly aggressive or stupidly paranoid or some such thing. Especially not when this is due largely to our own personal private reading of connotations and subtext in between the (very sparse) lines of Oneiros's published captains' logs on the ISC.

We've already managed to blow up one conversation about the ISC, and we did it by making too much soup from too few oysters, causing people to believe they had reason to hate the ISC when in fact they barely knew the ISC. Let's please not repeat the exact same mistake, okay everyone?
 
Except that's not what happened? That was a different update?
To follow up on that, here's the sum total of interactions with the ISC, in order.
Captain's Log, USS Courageous, Stardate 25854.1

Several lightyears past Sydraxian and Yan-Ros space, we arrived at the M-414 star system, and pulled into orbit around the fifth planet. Before we could begin studying the surface, however, a trio of starships arrived in system. They were of a rather different technology base, but seemingly equal to our own technology.

I have attempted to hail them, but this has appeared to confuse them more than anything else, as the ships immediately withdrew from the system, heading further coreward. We are cautiously following.
Captain's Log, USS Courageous, Stardate 25856.3

After being following at a careful distance for a few days, the unknown ships have come to a halt. We arrived in the Mercurio system to find ourselves confronted by the three ships, plus another three ships.

Thus at a heavy disparity in firepower, I ordered the lowering of shields and an approach that left us with a clear exit vector should we need to engage warp engines in a hurry. The starships are continuing to sit there unresponsively for the time being, however.
Captain's Log, USS Courageous, Stardate 25856.7

A civilian starship has arrived bearing an ambassador, who has made contact with us. Apparently the ships we were following represent a group known as the Interstellar Commonwealth. They are an advanced group, with a sole species known as the Padani. From what I have been able to ascertain, they have a number of major worlds, and may in fact be the largest faction we have encountered since the Cardassians. Encouragingly, despite their original standoffishness, they appear far more inclined to starting friendly relations with us than the Cardassians had been.

[New Major Power Encountered: The Interstellar Commonwealth]
[Initial Relations: Cordial]
[Mercurio is located along the upper edge of 4d]
Captain's Log, USS Courageous, Stardate 25878.4 - Captain Sabek

We are being directed to one of the major colony worlds of the Interstellar Commonwealth though, for safety reasons, not to the homeworld. I believe this is in keeping with much of what I have seen so far; this is a very safety conscious people.

In terms of their appearance, they have a very strong resemblance to one of the original four Federation members, humans, on a physiological level, to a degree that comes close to spoofing the older models of bioscanner, though the most recent marks are able to detect the difference. One peculiarity that I am positive will fascinate my fellow Explorer captain, Captain T'Rinta, is that their ships appear devoid of photon torpedoes, while their warp cores emergency systems appears to work on an ingenious system of utilising the gamma-ray bursts of unintended matter/anti-matter initiations to purge other anti-matter into space in a positive feedback loop.

Their ships are very durable, though it sacrifices somewhat in terms of capacity to generate these safety margins.
Captain's Log, USS Courageous, Stardate 25880.1

Apparently the fact we are carrying a complement of photon torpedoes and our procession has come to a temporary halt. We have invited a set of engineering safety supervisors to examine the torpedo storage and assure them that this is not a threat to the planet we will be orbiting.

On a more productive note, the Captain of the Ironsides has also come aboard with the civilian representative and we were able to learn more about the peculiar behaviour of our host thus far. It appears that in their experience, cordial first contact scenarios have basically been unknown. Part of what has led them to be so slow in reacting to us is their difficulty getting over the idea that we did not intend them some form of violence. Apparently my lowering of shields did much to impress this on them.

[Gain +10pp, gain initial contacts with the ISC]
Captain's Log, USS Courageous, Stardate 25999.2 - Captain Sabek

Our sensors have given us a possible plan to build solidarity through common experience with the Padani of the Interstellar Commonwealth.

A party practising piracy was picked up by Padani patrols, and partially pinned to this particular parsec. While their sensors seem insufficiently sensitive to seek out the system their suspects are seeking sanctuary in, science officer Shrai sh'Hasshan succeeded.

I will take the Courageous in to join them.

[Chief of Staff's NB: I know what you're thinking. I'll check with the Courageous' councillor quickly]
[Admiral's NB: Isn't it a little early in all of our tenures to be going mad already?]
Captain's Log, USS Courageous, Stardate 26000.2

It appears that the Interstellar Commonwealth puts great stock in the concept that safety and effectiveness outweighs the importance of efficiency. They are bringing a battle group of four of their large Guardian-class cruisers to this battle. With the addition of the Courageous our anti-piracy task force has become very formidable.
Captain's Log, USS Courageous, Stardate 26001.5

As a positive, the battle has been carried, and surrendered pirates loaded into brigs on the ISC ships.

However, during the battle, we suffered a statistically improbable strike causing disproportionate damage. A phaser beam pushing through frequencies caused a minor burn-through, that in turn destroyed part of the second dorsal radial EPS trunk, causing an explosion that resulted in a number of casualties, and damage to the ship.

Despite this regrettable result, we have made a positive impression with the Padani.

[Courageous damaged, -1 T, 1Qtr repair required, -30br, -10sr]

Note that relations started at Cordial, and didn't shift categories from the pirate hunting?
 
Last edited:
Except that's not what happened? That was a different update?

TFW someone starts pulling quotes to disprove your point and show it wasn't what happened, and you instead feel it proves your point and shows that was what happened.

Yes, it was a different update, but it was still in that First Contact period of time. Going by stardate digits = days, the Courageous participated in a joint anti-piracy operation less than 50 days after meeting the ISC for the first time.
 
Back
Top