If you compare hitpower rolled and damage actually dealt to shield strength it looks like both sides had +5% damage, so the Cardassians apparently have identical intel and research bonuses.

Looking at the battle last month hitpower to damage ratio was 1.1 for both sides. That doesn't really seem to make sense? Why would it be identical in both cases? Maybe the bonuses for one side are accidentally also used for the other, or the variable for the second side aliases the one for the first and both sides get both sets of bonuses?
 
Last edited:
I don't think this kind of result is unusual. This is why I suggest a 1.5 advantage before taking any major battles. Combat in 1v1 should be highly variable and dependent on who gets a break first.
The other side does know that, too, and tries for the same. So it comes again to us to deploy fleets and reserves such that the enemy cannot achieve that type of local superiority.
 
Yes, but with higher combat, our ship should be getting more shots in and more damage per shot.

Looking, this... Very clearly did not happen. It appears there was a 22-18 shots fired in favor of the Jaldun at turn 40 and then 27-23 at turn 50.

After turn 50 the 'Toga caught back up, but it did so on 19 hp, which would've given it a terrible combat rating, and that was when it started missing all its shots. I would blatantly hypothesize that a shots advantage pre-40 would be a battle winning sort of thing.
 
Last edited:
Looking, this... Very clearly did not happen. It appears there was a 22-18 shots fired in favor of the Jaldun at turn 40 and then 27-23 at turn 50.

After turn 50 the 'Toga caught back up, but it did so on 19 hp, which would've given it a terrible combat rating, and that was when it started missing all its shots. I would blatantly hypothesize that a shots advantage pre-40 would be a battle winning sort of thing.
you're right. I got aspects of the old combat system and the new one mixed up.
 
If anything our bad luck in that battle was that we got zero evasions, when we should expect a 1mt ship to get 10 to 15%.

e: There is a 2.2% chance of zero dodges in 36 shots at 10% evasion. Please note that while this is a low chance, we should expect it to happen every now and then. It is not so low as to discount.
e: And in fact we did evade in the first version without our bonus.
 
Last edited:
If anything our bad luck in that battle was that we got zero evasions, when we should expect a 1mt ship to get 10 to 15%.
That, and of the Jaldun's 4 evasions (11% for the curious), 3 were clustered right at the point where its shields were about to fail, giving it a last-minute breather at a critical point.

e: 11%, not 17
 
Last edited:
That, and of the Jaldun's 4 evasions (17% for the curious), 3 were clustered right at the point where its shields were about to fail, giving it a last-minute breather at a critical point.
It's like the RNG knew that combat is not safe ...

what? no of course not. it's a just a Cardassian with a skin condition. implying that a dirty alien could sneak onto cardassia past inherently superior Cardassian security is beyond ridiculous.
How good that there are voluntary reeducation courses available for which anyone can be nominated by considerate citizens.
 
Last edited:
what? no of course not. it's a just a Cardassian with a skin condition. implying that a dirty alien could sneak onto cardassia past inherently superior Cardassian security is beyond ridiculous.
How dare anyone impugn the noble character of that crew member! Choosing to serve honorably in a thankless position while bearing the burden of a deformity, they're a true inspiration and a model citizen of the Union! Those who outright insult them should feel shame.
 
How dare anyone impugn the noble character of that crew member! Choosing to serve honorably in a thankless position while bearing the burden of a deformity, they're a true inspiration and a model citizen of the Union! Those who outright insult them should feel shame.
Esteemed citizen, the words 'thankless position' and 'deformity' impugn the honor of each righteous Cardassian. You'd do well to reflect on your dishonor and the right course of action.
 
Esteemed citizen, the words 'thankless position' and 'deformity' impugn the honor of each righteous Cardassian. You'd do well to reflect on your dishonor and the right course of action.
You are correct. I will go spend 3 days fasting food and water in a spartan room, reflecting on my mistakes and how to correct them, to better serve the Cardassian Union.
 
You are correct. I will go spend 3 days fasting food and water in a spartan room, reflecting on my mistakes and how to correct them, to better serve the Cardassian Union.
Call for medical services. How does it serve the Union if you waste 3 days of productivity and weaken your body and mind that could serve better if correctly mainained?
 
Every day you spend away from work on such self-punishment is a day the output of this great state drops unacceptably.

Much quicker to report to your worksite counsellor for immediate application of educational materials.

However, reducing your food intake is always an acceptable sacrifice.
 
Call for medical services. How does it serve the Union if you waste 3 days of productivity and weaken your body and mind that could serve better if correctly mainained?

Doing proper reporting on the problem, including documenting it so others can learn from is an investment in future higher productivity. Stress from limited deprecation can improve focus, and aid in long term emotional association with memory.

This task is permissible, but long term productivity trends must be monitored to ensure that the loss from this self assessment is compensated for.
 
wait, how the hell was that fight so one sided? we had a one point combat advantage but barely scorched the hull. I thought having a combat advantage was supposed to be a really big advantage for a fight?
Combat has been (arguably) nerfed by the combat engine change. Basically, the high-combat side of a fight used to have not only a higher chance of hitting the enemy fleet, but a lower chance of being hit in return. Now, Combat has nothing to do with hit probabilities, and only affects how much damage a ship does when it (by random roll) hits the enemy.

If the captain is still alive I suspect they're never getting another command. This was an absolute disgrace. Disgusting.

The worst part is that this will embolden the Cardassians and reverse the initiative that we gained earlier on.
The problem is, (in the original iteration of this fight, I think) Saratoga inflicted nearly as much damage on the Cardassians as the Cardassians inflicted on her. But ConnieBees have slightly lower health totals than Jalduns to begin with, and their combat power starts declining faster when they start taking hull damage.

It also didn't help that the Jaldun dodged four of our shots while we dodged NONE of theirs. Evasion percentages are really important in close fights like this, because our shots doing 25% more damage each time makes a lot less difference when they get to go "EVADED" on 10% of the shots that hit them and we don't.

i'm a bit confused that a coniee B has a 50/50 shot of beating a ship it has a moderately large firepower advantage over. do Jalduns have like D 7 or something?
Jalduns have a durability advantage, and the firepower advantage isn't THAT large. Combat 3 is a lot stronger than Combat 2, but Combat 5 isn't all that much stronger than Combat 4. The margin of superiority is enough that a few more 'low' damage rolls can cancel out the high firepower.

Also, with all ships having shield regeneration of some degree or other, and the new randomized damage values meaning that sometimes you only deal 'chip' damage to the enemy no matter HOW good your Combat score is... I think that high-Combat, low-durability designs are no longer very viable anywhere, really.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top