Space Robosnake seems awesome. Like a friendly and less useful pit droid.
Resizing raster images always seemed annoying to me, I was probably not using the right software or enough magic wands though.
We're losing weight efficiency to the Denobulans somewhere, since we're getting the exact same specs yet our base+nacelle design is 10kt heavier than theirs. Since the main difference is the nacelles that's the most likely place.100 kilotons. 20 from the single nacelle, 40 from the 'base' hull and non-negotiable systems (like the reactor, warp engines, control systems, whatever crew amenities we could jam in), 40 from the 'additional' hull and support systems needed for each module.
Space Robosnake seems awesome. Like a friendly and less useful pit droid.
Resizing raster images always seemed annoying to me, I was probably not using the right software or enough magic wands though.
Ooookay den.
At some point we should actually build this ship, see if we can't break the warp 9 barrier, because that looks like what you'd use to do that.
Please NO! Look at the majesty you deny us!
![]()
Though I am confused as to how this thing is 20k tons of nacelle and 80k tons of saucer. I guess nacelles are radically less dense than anything else?
And yes I am blowing things up to pixel size. It's how I model them.
Please NO! Look at the majesty you deny us!
![]()
Though I am confused as to how this thing is 20k tons of nacelle and 80k tons of saucer. I guess nacelles are radically less dense than anything else?
And yes I am blowing things up to pixel size. It's how I model them.
Yes, but I hate how solidworks does perspective. It tends to overcorrect and make things look awful.I'm pretty sure perspective is turned off here and that makes it look worse than it is.
All hail the Little Cesar class!Please NO! Look at the majesty you deny us!
![]()
Though I am confused as to how this thing is 20k tons of nacelle and 80k tons of saucer. I guess nacelles are radically less dense than anything else?
And yes I am blowing things up to pixel size. It's how I model them.
Vote's already closed.[X] Full Saucer with Inline Deflector [Total Mass: 100,000 Tons]
[X] Half-Saucer [Primary Hull Mass: 50,000 Tons] (Secondary Hull - 50,000)
Both? Both. Both is good.
Ah, my bad. Sorry.
Yeah, an easy justification for nacelles not weighing much is that they're mostly filled with high temperature but low density plasma.I mean, it's literally on-screen canon that most of a Nacelle is actually a big hollow tube. By the time of TNG they've got them compressed down, and can shove a control room at the back (now there's a posting for someone on shit-duty!), but I'd wager the principle is the same, that the main length of the nacelle is the "rings" of the warp system around a hollow space that holds the plasma.
The canon I'm familiar with states the nacelles are enormously dense, something like 1/3 of the mass of a large ship, because the warp coils have to be large and uncompromisingly dense, kinda like the innards of a transformer or something. The rest of the ship you can honeycomb, you can use various alloys and tricks to lower mass, but not the warp coils.Yeah, an easy justification for nacelles not weighing much is that they're mostly filled with high temperature but low density plasma.
My god, it's adorable! Probably the cutest little ship we've ever made. And thanks for the extra views, even if not necessarily necessary they really help give the design more life.