CL=Light CruiserPeople keep mentioning "CL" and I have no idea what that is supposed to stand for tbh.
CA=Heavy Cruiser
DA= Dreadnought
CL=Light CruiserPeople keep mentioning "CL" and I have no idea what that is supposed to stand for tbh.
CL is for Light Cruiser.People keep mentioning "CL" and I have no idea what that is supposed to stand for tbh.
I usually see DN as the Dreadnought prefix myself
Typical Naval desgination for Light CruiserPeople keep mentioning "CL" and I have no idea what that is supposed to stand for tbh.
Yeah, when I say CL... I'm kinda hoping/expecting for an intermediary 200kt design as opposed to a slightly larger and meaner Stingray. More than being an anti-piracy design, the Stingray is fundamentally a product of our initial shoestring industrial base.It's part of what draws me to a 'medium' cruiser concept: something that can be produced in relatively large numbers while still being large enough that refits for things like new warp cores or shields aren't a pressing issue.
hope that gets marked as informationalTypical Naval desgination for Light Cruiser
FF- Frigate
DD- Destroyer
DL- Destroyer Leader
Cl - Light Cruiser
CA- Heavy cruiser
CC- Command Cruiser
DN - Dreadnought
BB- Battleship
CV- Carrier
CVL- Light Carrier
Not always accurate but typically good rule of thumb.
My auto-corrupt is amazingly stupid.CL is for Light Cruiser.
I don't think anyone has used it here yet, but FYI CA is for heavy cruiser (originally armoured cruiser, but that meaning has faded)
Edit
I usually see DN as the Dreadnought prefix myself
There is somthing wrong with our ships today.One must simply embrace RTW for a few months and all will make sense. Speed is Armor.
The Coalition has the Romulans beet on speed by a rather large margin. It is kind of hard to ambush ships that are more than twice your speed.(Not impossible mind you but i would not stick my warplanning on that)This kind of runs on the assumption that an unconditional surrender is a possibility. That the coalition can actually enforce whatever conditions it wants.
I think this is unlikely.
The major weaknesses of the Romulan fleet, as we've seen so far, are it's warp speed and endurance. Their fleet simply can not get to the enemy, unless they're doing what effectively amounts to a suicide charge. That means that so far, we've been fighting Romulan forces that have had one hand tied behind their back.
As forces close in on the Romulan Empire, it's coalition whose supply lines will be stretched, while the Romulan Empire will be free to use all their tricks. Stealthed raiders and supply lines are not friends, and are likely to make any effective siege of a planet impossible.
And hey, when the biggest ship we have carries a grand total of 160 personnel, a planetary invasion is simply impossible. Surrender or get nuked is the only way to take any planet that has more than a token outpost on it.
You're making me remember those stupid BBs the Russians sent at me awhile back. All guns, all speed, no armor. It might have worked had my guns been worse, as it was? They went up like fireworks as soon as you looked at them funny. Ammunition explosions every 5 minutes, it was glorious.One must simply embrace RTW for a few months and all will make sense. Speed is Armor.
The TV show got canceled before it got to the Romulan War, so anything outside of deliberately vague offhand references comes from said books.Just to be clear for everyone, other than the Coalition of Planets victory at the Battle of Cheron, the references to planetary ramming, biological weapons, and Haakonans are novel references not shown on TV.
(The Beta quadrant people are Haakonans on the planet Haakona I believe. Haakonians are a different species in the delta quadrant, part of the Haakonian Order.)
Nah, she wasn't taken out like a chump.I have read all this conversation of Thunderchild and i'm surprised that not a single one of you guys discovered that we created our Own Bismarck, now we only need a Sabaton-like band and she will be eternalized in a badass music video
Yup. It being damaged is pretty inevitable when you attract all the firepower from every ship you're facing and it means that those ships aren't then blowing up the smaller and squishier ships backing you up. Ultimately the Thunderchild gave us an excellent offensive capability that we just didn't have before.All arguments aside, the Thunderchild did its job exactly as designed--it anchored the battle line, drew fire to itself, and even when it got fucked up, it could be patched back up enough to rejoin the fight in the long run rather than being a total loss that needed to be towed back to drydock, assuming it wasn't just blown to bits.
And as we saw, that high roll on the torpedoes made it an absolute nightmare fuel level linebreaker and siegebreaker. Taking down a fortified outpost in one pass? Someone on the Romulan side is going to have a lot of sleepless nights after that.
It is not unfair to say that with this one engagement Thunderchild has become the most successful battleship in human history. Hilarious, but not unfair.
...really not sure I like our ship being compared to something built by the Nazis?I have read all this conversation of Thunderchild and i'm surprised that not a single one of you guys discovered that we created our Own Bismarck, now we only need a Sabaton-like band and she will be eternalized in a badass music video
Unless we get shields this next round, yeah, that would be my vote. Our ships already have a strategic speed advantage, and Warp 5 logistics would let us fully leverage that in the fight up to the Romulan border.A thought occurs to me. Instead of a new CL, which we admittedly do need, what about a fleet tender/heavy freighter? This would greatly extend our reach and have obvious post-war applications.