Yep, if there's an option to put a prototype in I'm for it 8 times out of 10. A little more money now for that damage keeps the platform relevant for longer and advances tech adoption.Well, to be fair, it usually pays off. An Excalibur design without the fore mounted RFL likely wouldn't have been as effective in keeping Starfleet's head above water long enough for the situation to stabilize during the Four Years War.
The engine is irrelevant!
Are you sure it's the ship, and not the designers? kek[X] Rollbar Nacelle Supports (+2 Fore/Aft Torpedo Mounts)
Pretty sure i called it, bipolar ship.
I have a very different read of the war than you apparently. The Newton held the line, but the Excalibur won the war. If all that Starfleet had was Newtons then the Klingons would have picked Starfleet to pieces. The Excalibur was key to actually fighting back against Klingon aggression and stopping their relentless advance by forcing them to guard their rear lines.I do think it's kind of funny how we're basically redoing canon with SanFran's Miranda being the ubiquitous 'good-enough' ship that gets spammed everywhere while our Federation is on course to be a bloated dreadnaught that only exists as obscure statbook trivia rather than a meaningful presence in the fleet.
Funny in a sad way, that is. The worst part of the Klingon War updates for me was seeing how the Newton constantly got mentioned as the main ship on the frontlines getting the work done, when it wasn't a ship we had any hand in. It's gonna suck when the next major event happens and we hear about lots of Miranda action because we spent our time on a limited run novelty dick-waving ship that has the most absurd numbers in Jane's Fighting Starships of the 2250s but only exists as a single digit run of prestige ships.
this 💯. For the all the fancy tech we work with, we peaked with the Archer. We'll never has a more ubiquitous and long serving ship as our ugly as sin, rinky dink cargo hauler.I do think it's kind of funny how we're basically redoing canon with SanFran's Miranda being the ubiquitous 'good-enough' ship that gets spammed everywhere while our Federation is on course to be a bloated dreadnaught that only exists as obscure statbook trivia rather than a meaningful presence in the fleet.
I'm not saying the Excalibur wasn't important, but a lot of the time it wasn't present. The war would've been far more satisfying to read if the ship involved in so many of those desperate battles before the Excaliburs could show up had been one of ours rather than an NPC design.I have a very different read of the war than you apparently. The Newton held the line, but the Excalibur won the war. If all that Starfleet had was Newtons then the Klingons would have picked Starfleet to pieces. The Excalibur was key to actually fighting back against Klingon aggression and stopping their relentless advance by forcing them to guard their rear lines.
Doomerism is unbecoming of a Starfleet Officer.I do think it's kind of funny how we're basically redoing canon with SanFran's Miranda being the ubiquitous 'good-enough' ship that gets spammed everywhere while our Federation is on course to be a bloated dreadnaught that only exists as obscure statbook trivia rather than a meaningful presence in the fleet.
Funny in a sad way, that is. The worst part of the Klingon War updates for me was seeing how the Newton constantly got mentioned as the main ship on the frontlines getting the work done, when it wasn't a ship we had any hand in. It's gonna suck when the next major event happens and we hear about lots of Miranda action because we spent our time on a limited run novelty dick-waving ship that has the most absurd numbers in Jane's Fighting Starships of the 2250s but only exists as a single digit run of prestige ships.
We were told from the start we had to justify it, that tactical ability had to be matched with usefulness in other fields, so we always knew we had to think really carefully about module choice to make this thing worth the investment.Doomerism is unbecoming of a Starfleet Officer.
I think it's kind of odd actually. We are told 'you have the option to strap an extra entire starship's worth of photon launchers to this thing, but if you do it'll be expensive and a limited run' and people hear that the ship is already a bloated useless boondoggle.
These are not the same statements! We're being told that we're at the pricey end of a normal run so we have to justify it.
That's almost uncalled for!We were told from the start we had to justify it, that tactical ability had to be matched with usefulness in other fields, so we always knew we had to think really carefully about module choice to make this thing worth the investment.
But now we're at the point of Starfleet throwing up their hands and saying, "Fuck it, do whatever, we'll only build a couple anyway." Instead of being the fast response fire stopper we have all over the place solving crises, it's going to be some admiral's vanity flagship.
Morale is important when you're spending at least months at a time zipping around Federation space doing things and blowing up Pirates, all the while occasionally glancing nervously over towards our borders with the Klingon Empire.