Endorfinator
Awkwardly Social
- Location
- California
- Pronouns
- He/Him
How could we possibly pass up the opportunity to design the Miranda? It is *the* Starfleet ship for the next 120 years.
By making a bigger, better Miranda. That's how.How could we possibly pass up the opportunity to design the Miranda? It is *the* Starfleet ship for the next 120 years.
The medium weight is stated to cut cost by cutting non-vital capability while the heavy weight is stated to use high mass to get both really good defenses while having depth of capability.It sounds like we're either choosing between a smaller generalist to operate within our borders or a larger generalist with expeditionary capability.
We've just built the Excalibur for a long range strike cruiser, so I'm not sure that we really want to build another long range generalist that supersedes the Excalibur when we've just been told that those newtons need to be replaced.
Yes, the cannon 2280 Excelsior is two million tons. That'll set the mid-weight a lot higher. We might do ours in 2265-2270? That when it looks like a lot of new tech should be coming online from all the refits in the retrospectives.
I would not be opposed to a 540 Kton cruiser with three thrusters for medium maneuverability.
*googles*
You werent kidding.Yeah, me like.
So that will probably start design around 2270. Gonna want to be in on that project.
Does suggest we should be looking north of 300,000 tons for the heavy cruiser.
That's not really how our ships work though? Modules are free, so all a mid weight ship means is that it doesn't get as much module space. The Excalibur is as close to a pure warship as we can get and it's still able to serve as an explorer, if a rather mediocre one.So the choice isn't between a generalist and a heavy warship. The choice is between a medium weight warship that struggles to be anything other than a warship and a large ship that does something really well and is ALSO a highly shielded tank in war.
Thunderchild remix, anyone?I of course vote for 360,000 tons of a single primary saucer with no secondary hull.
A reminder: these are not, strictly speaking, breakpoints. Agility is a smooth progression between the numbers Captainwolf has presented.
I think we probably go 6-7 phasers, maybe a bit more, and pay for it by only bringing the one rapid. Yes, yes, burst and sustained firepower will suffer, but at 25-270 ktons we're looking at +50% shielding (at least!) and +10% phaser DPS compared to the Excalibur, and we don't actually need anything close to its total firepower.I think realistically the armaments could be something like 4-5 phaser banks and 2 rapid launchers.
While true, it's hard to not think that with say twice the mass you could totally outdo its capability module wise. All while still only using two engines, and due to shield strength increasing with mass, one can use a switch from heavy shielding to medium to come out at barely any extra cost for it.That's not really how our ships work though? Modules are free, so all a mid weight ship means is that it doesn't get as much module space. The Excalibur is as close to a pure warship as we can get and it's still able to serve as an explorer, if a rather mediocre one.
Even on the Excalibur itself, had we taken modules that gave engineering or science or cargo rather than more fuel or expanded crew quarters, could've been a much better generalist while maintaining strong tactical.
I'm not necessarily opposed to replacing the Sagarmatha instead of the Newton, but the main thing I'm concerned about is this:While true, it's hard to not think that with say twice the mass you could totally outdo its capability module wise. All while still only using two engines, and due to shield strength increasing with mass, one can use a switch from heavy shielding to medium to come out at barely any extra cost for it.
We've been designing really compact designs for the last few ships, so it would be interesting to go the other way and take all the size our extremely powerful engines would allow and make something that would potentially be a truly great generalist.
Considering that our main advantage is our industrial strength, it'd be nice to replenish our engineering cruisers.the Newton was providing a useful response and utility function that the slower (and more logistically valuable) Archers are now having to cover.
Their ability to provide a stable firing position while other fleet elements maneuvered around or through their formations represent a key element of Federation fleet doctrine.
Ehhhh. Given the "you can only shoot one phaser bank at any given time" limit is still in effect afaict, that's a lot of cost tied up for weapon mounts that more often than not can't/won't be used. =/I think we probably go 6-7 phasers, maybe a bit more, and pay for it by only bringing the one rapid. Yes, yes, burst and sustained firepower will suffer, but at 25-270 ktons we're looking at +50% shielding (at least!) and +10% phaser DPS compared to the Excalibur, and we don't actually need anything close to its total firepower.
I think what we learned is that landing a starship is a very tricky business that takes specialized parts and even in the best case what you're hoping for is "nothing went too badly wrong" not "this was smooth and routine". It's never going to be routine, what with having to deal with unpredictable planetary atmospheres and landing gear that needs nothing to go wrong on touchdown.
Now don't mistake me, I don't regret it at all for the Attenborough. For the function it served, it needed that capability. But it's never going to be a standard capability. Specialized needs only.
Given that the current paradigm does mention largely solo ship encounters? Speed does matter.
Fleet actions, while strategically critical, will form only a minority of the combat actions this ship will be engaged in.
That said, Im not convinced it needs Very High for that.
High is probably sufficient as long as we are going for all-round weapon coverage.
To be fair, while the ability to act as a fleet anchor is important, we should still be acting on the assumption that the ship also has to function acceptably independently (since most of the time a ship is going to be acting independently).
How could we possibly pass up the opportunity to design the Miranda? It is *the* Starfleet ship for the next 120 years.