Starfleet Design Bureau

It sounds like we're either choosing between a smaller generalist to operate within our borders or a larger generalist with expeditionary capability.

We've just built the Excalibur for a long range strike cruiser, so I'm not sure that we really want to build another long range generalist that supersedes the Excalibur when we've just been told that those newtons need to be replaced.
 
It sounds like we're either choosing between a smaller generalist to operate within our borders or a larger generalist with expeditionary capability.

We've just built the Excalibur for a long range strike cruiser, so I'm not sure that we really want to build another long range generalist that supersedes the Excalibur when we've just been told that those newtons need to be replaced.
The medium weight is stated to cut cost by cutting non-vital capability while the heavy weight is stated to use high mass to get both really good defenses while having depth of capability.

So the choice isn't between a generalist and a heavy warship. The choice is between a medium weight warship that struggles to be anything other than a warship and a large ship that does something really well and is ALSO a highly shielded tank in war.

I for one think we should build the hospital ship we have talked about for a while. Let's give our big defensive ship good reason to hang around our colonies and outer regions without running around surveying systems where our populations are not yet. It can run loops around our outer regions bringing tier one medical services to areas without access and then also act as a medical recovery ship post battle to save as many casualties as possible in war.
 
Last edited:
Yes, the cannon 2280 Excelsior is two million tons. That'll set the mid-weight a lot higher. We might do ours in 2265-2270? That when it looks like a lot of new tech should be coming online from all the refits in the retrospectives.
:eek:
*googles*
You werent kidding.Yeah, me like.
So that will probably start design around 2270. Gonna want to be in on that project.

Does suggest we should be looking north of 300,000 tons for the heavy cruiser.
 
So the choice isn't between a generalist and a heavy warship. The choice is between a medium weight warship that struggles to be anything other than a warship and a large ship that does something really well and is ALSO a highly shielded tank in war.
That's not really how our ships work though? Modules are free, so all a mid weight ship means is that it doesn't get as much module space. The Excalibur is as close to a pure warship as we can get and it's still able to serve as an explorer, if a rather mediocre one.

Even on the Excalibur itself, had we taken modules that gave engineering or science or cargo rather than more fuel or expanded crew quarters, could've been a much better generalist while maintaining strong tactical.
 
A useful thing to note is the breakpoints for our thrusters:
A reminder: these are not, strictly speaking, breakpoints. Agility is a smooth progression between the numbers Captainwolf has presented.

I think realistically the armaments could be something like 4-5 phaser banks and 2 rapid launchers.
I think we probably go 6-7 phasers, maybe a bit more, and pay for it by only bringing the one rapid. Yes, yes, burst and sustained firepower will suffer, but at 25-270 ktons we're looking at +50% shielding (at least!) and +10% phaser DPS compared to the Excalibur, and we don't actually need anything close to its total firepower.

And this thing should certainly be able to shoot backwards, so we don't need a second tube pointing that way.
 
That's not really how our ships work though? Modules are free, so all a mid weight ship means is that it doesn't get as much module space. The Excalibur is as close to a pure warship as we can get and it's still able to serve as an explorer, if a rather mediocre one.

Even on the Excalibur itself, had we taken modules that gave engineering or science or cargo rather than more fuel or expanded crew quarters, could've been a much better generalist while maintaining strong tactical.
While true, it's hard to not think that with say twice the mass you could totally outdo its capability module wise. All while still only using two engines, and due to shield strength increasing with mass, one can use a switch from heavy shielding to medium to come out at barely any extra cost for it.

We've been designing really compact designs for the last few ships, so it would be interesting to go the other way and take all the size our extremely powerful engines would allow and make something that would potentially be a truly great generalist.
 
While true, it's hard to not think that with say twice the mass you could totally outdo its capability module wise. All while still only using two engines, and due to shield strength increasing with mass, one can use a switch from heavy shielding to medium to come out at barely any extra cost for it.

We've been designing really compact designs for the last few ships, so it would be interesting to go the other way and take all the size our extremely powerful engines would allow and make something that would potentially be a truly great generalist.
I'm not necessarily opposed to replacing the Sagarmatha instead of the Newton, but the main thing I'm concerned about is this:
the Newton was providing a useful response and utility function that the slower (and more logistically valuable) Archers are now having to cover.
Considering that our main advantage is our industrial strength, it'd be nice to replenish our engineering cruisers.

On the other hand, the tactical role Starfleet wants to fill definitely favors a larger vessel:
Their ability to provide a stable firing position while other fleet elements maneuvered around or through their formations represent a key element of Federation fleet doctrine.

So I guess it's really a matter of whether we want to prioritize the peacetime or wartime application here.
 
The Miranda was the workhorse of Starfleet for 120 years. The Federation class was a ship from a third party book. I'd rather leave our mark on the Miranda.
 
[X] Project Federation (Heavy Line Cruiser)

I want to build a big ship so that it has lots of capability, and moderately arm it so that it is cheap enough it can be built in Miranda numbers.
 
Last edited:
I think we probably go 6-7 phasers, maybe a bit more, and pay for it by only bringing the one rapid. Yes, yes, burst and sustained firepower will suffer, but at 25-270 ktons we're looking at +50% shielding (at least!) and +10% phaser DPS compared to the Excalibur, and we don't actually need anything close to its total firepower.
Ehhhh. Given the "you can only shoot one phaser bank at any given time" limit is still in effect afaict, that's a lot of cost tied up for weapon mounts that more often than not can't/won't be used. =/
 
[X] Project Miranda (Midweight Generalist)

I want to design a generalist. A GOOD generalist. It's easy to do a scattershot generalist, but I want one that brings out all the synergies.

I think what we learned is that landing a starship is a very tricky business that takes specialized parts and even in the best case what you're hoping for is "nothing went too badly wrong" not "this was smooth and routine". It's never going to be routine, what with having to deal with unpredictable planetary atmospheres and landing gear that needs nothing to go wrong on touchdown.

Now don't mistake me, I don't regret it at all for the Attenborough. For the function it served, it needed that capability. But it's never going to be a standard capability. Specialized needs only.

"Specialized Needs" is "has to do things on a planet for a long time" though

Given that the current paradigm does mention largely solo ship encounters? Speed does matter.
Fleet actions, while strategically critical, will form only a minority of the combat actions this ship will be engaged in.

That said, Im not convinced it needs Very High for that.
High is probably sufficient as long as we are going for all-round weapon coverage.

They have mentioned this is the Golden Age of Orion Piracy. So on that note we want to be able to show up and say 'no, you're all going to jail.'

To be fair, while the ability to act as a fleet anchor is important, we should still be acting on the assumption that the ship also has to function acceptably independently (since most of the time a ship is going to be acting independently).

We don't have any looming wars, we want to prevent more wars by not getting on the backfoot. So yes agreed.

How could we possibly pass up the opportunity to design the Miranda? It is *the* Starfleet ship for the next 120 years.

Yeah, Miranda and Excelsior are the future of Starfleet and I want to do it right.
 
[X] Project Miranda (Midweight Generalist)

Yeah the Miranda is iconic for star trek fans, I want to do stuff to it.
 
[X] Project Miranda (Midweight Generalist)

The Miranda is a iconic Starfleet ship, I'd rather design it over something else.
Though the Federation also wouldn't be terrible
 
Last edited:
Yeah, the implication I get is that the current main limitation on hull size is sublight thrust, doesn't matter how fast your ship can Warp if it's not capable of moving anywhere when it's not at Warp.

So right now, there's a soft cap of 500kt, in that this is the most mass we can push without completely tanking our manuverability. We can get it a bit higher if we go four engines (Though we need to think very carefully before considering a four thruster arrangement given the cost inflation involved).

Presumably the next generation of Impulse Thrusters are going to be able to push a lot more mass.
 
Last edited:
[X] Project Miranda (Midweight Generalist)

Given how well the Excalibur performed and the canon Miranda being pretty close to the canon Connie, it should be entirely doable to make a ship capable of going 2-to-1 with the Klingons while having options for hull configurations (like Electronic Warfare or Missile Pods or whatever), all within a relatively affordable package. I love big ships, but given our losses, I think we need the ability to be several places at once in a way some new Dreadnaught wouldn't be able to meet.
 
[X] Project Federation (Heavy Line Cruiser)

Jokes about the Miranda Infestation of Starfleet aside, the canon Miranda was enough of a success to last a century of service, so we don't really need to 'improve' it. The Federation, as far as I can tell though, was a dubiously canon, overly expensive, 3 nacelle boondoggle, and could really be reworked by us into a suitable step between the Excalibur and the Excelsior.

But more importantly, I just don't trust SV with designing a ship whose design brief requires us to save costs by removing areas and choosing a minimal science score.
 
Back
Top