People have lives, reputations and desires of their own. Very few people go around trying to rape, murder and kill for their own amusement. Especially in Dragonball
*Bolded for emphasis*
While I'm not entirely against your point, I do want to point out that that bit about "especially in dragonball" is a little absurd... I mean, did you watch/read the Dragon Ball series? I mean, look at all the major bad guys in the later parts of the series. King Piccolo? Sadistic prick, had a whole "every day is the purge" thing going on there. Saiyan saga Vegeta and Nappa? The worst of all bad saiyan stereotypes. Frieza and every one of his minions who got a name and more than five minutes of screen time in the Namek saga? Jolly murdering assholes, the lot of them. Cell? Pretty much a collection of the worst parts of everyone who went into him...
see above. And you've already called out Buu as a "murderbot", so I don't even have to say anything there. Heck, even minor villains like the androids and Garlic Jr. thought nothing about casually murdering people for their own amusement.
Now, don't think I'm trying to counter your stance or point or anything. But trying to use the dragonball canon setting to say that the universe isn't populated with sadistic murderhobos isn't going to help your point when canon shows us that one'll pop up practically every time you turn around if you're not careful.
PRE-POSTING EDIT:
Probably. I am writing this at 7 (PRE-POSTING EDIT: Now nearly 9... writing on a phone sucks.) in the morning after having no sleep at all,
while on my phone, so I figured that absurdist wording in my post would substitute well enough for smilies to let everyone know that I wasn't taking this entirely seriously. Obviously this isn't the case. Bummer.
But since sleep seems to still be eluding me, let me clarify my position:
Right now, our illustrious author is giving us a quick and easy way out of the hole that we've dug ourselves into. We are being given a chance to make a quick choice that can deal with this pesky little conflicted mind we've got going on. We can either totally abandon pacifism, double down and leap back into pacifism head first, or not take the easy way out and admit that... maybe we don't know what the right answer is. That being said, taking that easy way is in and of itself a trap, at least how I see it. Let me explain.
The defining trait of Kakara so far has been that she's been the nonviolent saiyan. (Such as she can be. I still disagree with the current "definition" we're using for pacifist, and all the loopholes and drawbacks and such that go with it, but if I get into that I'd probably be awake until
tomorrow morning, so I'll let it slide. That being said...) If we were to just drop the Pacifist trait wholesale, I feel we'd be doing a disservice to the character... the current vote choice insinuates that pacifism is stupid and that we were stupid for trying it. And to be totally honest, even if we do drop pacifism and become the second coming of Son "Loves to Fight More Than Anything Else Other Than Food" Goku, I still think that as a part of Kakara, this was a pretty big part.
On the other hand, doubling down is a risk that I'm not sure we as players can justify, since we still haven't solved the underlying problem: that what we as a voter base and what Kakara believe are just two different things. Sure, we might say we think that it'd be nice to have a pacifist character, (and not all of us are) but when the chips come down and we're in a time sensitive situation where our friends and family are on the line (either in mortal peril and/or being hurt/tortured) and violence is the only quick, efficient option available to us? I have to wonder how many will vote for the diplomatic option, and how many will vote to do the violence and save our family/friends. And until we get this settled out, we're in danger of having this BS happen again and again, so long as the voter base is split.
Of course, neither of these options is wrong,
per se, but there is one factor I've left out until now: this has been... what, less than an hour? Maybe two at the most?... since we had our entire worldview shaken to its very core. If we immediately jump into a hard decision either for or against, what does it say about Kakara? To me, it seems a little too much like Berra and his Atoner trait, wherein he jumps head first at any opportunity to "fix his mistakes," rather than use some of that patience he's well known for to sit down and think for a while about whether it is the right thing to do. And it's, in my opinion, the same with jumping to the extreme in this vote. Doing so here,
in either direction, would be, in story, a knee jerked reaction on Kakara's part.
And I'm not sure I really want Kakara to be the kind of person who would base their entire world view on a decision made while we're still on the emotional roller coaster. What we need is time to sit down, think this over, and come to an informed decision about where to go from here. It make sense narratively, it makes sense logically, and it makes sense psychologically.
Thus I
have to, in all good conscience, vote for the options that has us admit we haven't thought about it, and will probably lead us to actually sitting down and thinking about it.
The whole altered Atoner trait thing was a joke, pointing out that the reaction in-thread to the failed violence update was so heavy that it might as well have been guided by said trait. If it was in bad taste, I apologize.