...Honestly I hadn't even considered that it might include their books on Dhar when I wrote that, lol. It's more just that magical theory in general is militarily relevant and thus not normally available for sale.Do you mean their books on Dhar, including select in-Sarvoi's-view legitimate use cases? You can just say you mean their books on Dhar, no additional suspicion will be acquired.![]()
Chess is a wargame, so it doesn't have to involve chance. Scouts honor can work too, though Qretch would absolutely cheat and assume everyone else does too. He probably has a whole elaborate theory of how to do it properly. After all, claiming bad rolls and winning anyway is the greatest display of dominance.@Boney
Silly-clever social turn idea, yes-yes!
Qrech and Mathilde and Eike play wargames! (Qrech starts playing wargames with people via post? Though I don't know how dice rolls would be arbitrated/trusted, or if post-wargames are viable in terms of 'how long the game would take to play')
I imagine reenacting historical battles would be poplar, which means it would be a lot of human vs human (because most don't want to pay as vampires or orks or Godforbid chaos).It's a fun idea for the meta of it, but I don't know if it'd actually work. The most likely character moment to happen is 'hey, remember when you were leading troops in an empire fundamentally opposed to the free existence of my species', which I don't think is the tone you were going for.
"Qrech starts playing wargames with people via post" Qrech accidentally armchair general-ling an actual army Ender style makes my innards quiver.It's a fun idea for the meta of it, but I don't know if it'd actually work. The most likely character moment to happen is 'hey, remember when you were leading troops in an empire fundamentally opposed to the free existence of my species', which I don't think is the tone you were going for.
As for whether or not we make Omegahugger very happy with this deal, I'd give it maybe 50/50 - it's not as though Mathilde is able to barter for them in specific without raising some awkward questions about herself. Yeah, she has the waystone project exemption, but the waystone project already has access to those books so I can't see a way for mathilde to get books about dhar if the queen decides to haggle over them in particular.
Monsters is too vague for a book category. Was there anything specific that this was intended to cover for this turn?
Acceptable examples:
Gors and Ungors
Centaurs, Minotaurs and Harpies
Dragons and Draconids
Griffins and Demigryphs
Chaos Mutants
I don't think we can quite launder our general insights of Dhar - knowing how to counter it like Mathilde does means you know how to use it better, our relevant trait tells us as much. That's not something you want out in the world for Magisters to learn.Hey, if the Library of Mournings gives us their books on Dhar, then maybe we get to write yet another paper in which we launder our insights with the excuse that we just so happened to run into these books and studied them for means of undoing them, honest.
We take the plausible deniability where we can get it.
I don't think the Eonir would make any distinction with Dhar. Unless ai am mistaken, they're elves, for them using Dhar should be no more different than using other any of the other Winds of Magic as their soul cannot (or rather should not) get tainted with it.
Something I think is interesting though is, if this is the cases they might have books about Dhar + Wind (like Dhar + Ulgu, the one we Shaw Eshin Friend using).
They do make a distinction, but not for the same reason. More importantly, Sarvoi at least is aware that for humans dhar is always dangerous, even if it took him a moment to remember during the reverse engineering meetings.I don't think the Eonir would make any distinction with Dhar. Unless ai am mistaken, they're elves, for them using Dhar should be no more different than using other any of the other Winds of Magic as their soul cannot (or rather should not) get tainted with it.
Something I think is interesting though is, if this is the cases they might have books about Dhar + Wind (like Dhar + Ulgu, the one we Shaw Eshin Friend using).
Frankly, that's funny as shit. I think we're more likely than not to learn at least a thing or two from the eonir dhar books, but I do recall Boney saying that if Mathilde had thrown her hat into the Dhar lore smackdown between Sarvoi and the Druchii diplomat that Weber could have schooled them both lmao.Hey, if the Library of Mournings gives us their books on Dhar, then maybe we get to write yet another paper in which we launder our insights with the excuse that we just so happened to run into these books and studied them for means of undoing them, honest.
We take the plausible deniability where we can get it.
I believe Boney has said that we could, in theory, make an attempt to codify the dhar-bane trait as a teachable paper without dhar-use, but that it would be really hard and take a high roll or something.I don't think we can quite launder our general insights of Dhar - knowing how to counter it means you know how to use it better, our relevant trait tells us as much. That's not something you want out in the world for Magisters to learn.
Omegahugger can have a little Dhar, as a treat.[><] [ITHILMAR] whatever would make Omegahugger & picklepikkl happiest.
I was going to say "no, that's not true", and then I realised I was getting mixed up with the Second Secret. I don't suppose you have a source, though?I believe Boney has said that we could, in theory, make an attempt to codify the dhar-bane trait as a teachable paper without dhar-use, but that it would be really hard and take a high roll or something.
So I suppose that might be about to get easier.
I imagine that across the years some library categories got folded together or simplified for the sake of library cleanliness, so I'm curious: Does that still hold up? Is our current Beastmen book topic mostly about Gors and Ungors, which form the basis of Beastmen culture in the Old World?
I was going to say "no, that's not true", and then I realised I was getting mixed up with the Second Secret. I don't suppose you have a source, though?
Potentially, but it would be extremely difficult to extricate teaching the +10 to countering from also inadvertently teaching the +20 to using, so it's likely to be astoundingly classified.
It'll be an option for Mathilde to spend time trying to separate the two as much as possible, but there's no guarantee of success.
That makes sense. I can see situations where you might one of those but not the other.The Beastmen topic that the library currently has is about their society and military. There'd be separate categories under Fauna for the various species that would go into anatomy, physiology, and how they act as individuals.
Do you know where Boney said Mathilde could smackdown the Druchii over dhar? I could see the Secrets giving a large advantage over them in combat and even lore to an extent, but I don't know of a quote from Boney saying that of the Druchii. Something similar was said about Sarvoi. Which, considering that Sarvoi is one of Laurelorn's foremost experts in magical theory, implies that Laurelorn only has a perfunctory understanding of Dhar. The First and Second secrets were discovered by Nagash by torturing random Druchii sorceresses. I'd be surprised if they didn't know of it.Frankly, that's funny as shit. I think we're more likely than not to learn at least a thing or two from the eonir dhar books, but I do recall Boney saying that if Mathilde had thrown her hat into the Dhar lore smackdown between Sarvoi and the Druchii diplomat that Weber could have schooled them both lmao.
[Using dark magic is] seen sort of like the magical equivalent of steroid abuse.
She could give [Sarvoi] lessons [in Dhar manipulation], and she's taking a fair bit of care to prevent that from showing.
I mean it could be more focused on Chaos Dwarves where he uses his knowledge of them to simulate a wargame of a theoretical attack on K8P or the Empire or somewhere else.It's a fun idea for the meta of it, but I don't know if it'd actually work. The most likely character moment to happen is 'hey, remember when you were leading troops in an empire fundamentally opposed to the free existence of my species', which I don't think is the tone you were going for.
Will it be?[X] [ITHILMAR] Trade Goods
[X] [ITHILMAR] Precious Stones
I think having a money chest full of precious gems or a more extensive trade company that can better give to serve us is a better investment than what books that eonir will give us.
I think +5s to fighting and planning to fight the beastmen guarding some of the nexus sites in the near future would be pretty impactful on its own (via strategy and tactics - Beastmen perks), nevermind bonuses to trying to codify anti-dhar knowledge, bonuses to the orbflex, and the narrative benefits of a broader foundation of Telsian than what the colleges have access to.The Beastmen topic that the library currently has is about their society and military. There'd be separate categories under Fauna for the various species that would go into anatomy, physiology, and how they act as individuals.
You found the quote I was thinking of when I said she could school them.Incidentally I found the quote describing how the Eonir see using Dhar.
Sarvoi schooled the diplomat, and when somebody asked if Mathilde learned anything from watching Boney said unprompted that Mathilde could teach Sarvoi how to do it better - the implication was pretty clear that in a dhar for dhar lore contest, Mathilde might have Sarvoi beat.She could give him lessons, and she's taking a fair bit of care to prevent that from showingTotal side note, but I wonder if Mathilde is gaining any off screen insight in Dhar manipulation from having the opportunity to see how a friendly elf uses it…
When did he do that? Are you talking about the Foundation roll? That was a draw, with neither party getting anything out of it. Sarvoi also wasn't casting magic, he was trying to trick the Sorceress into revealing magical secrets the he could use. That he went to the Sorceress for hints on the Foundation implies that he thinks that random Druchii sorceresses have a better understanding of Dhar than he does. Which honestly isn't that surprising.You found the quote I was thinking of when I said she could school them. Sarvoi schooled the diplomat, and when asked if Mathilde learned anything from watching he said that Mathilde could teach Sarvoi how to do it better.
Sarvoi, it seems, has a lot to share but little of it of immediate use - he and the Druchii Sorceress had apparently engaged in some rather recursive mind-games to try to winkle magical secrets out of each other, and while it seems both of them enjoyed the challenge and Sarvoi is eager to retell what he considers to be the most thrilling gambits of it, there seems to be a profound lack of usable results from it.
I edited my post to include the exact exchange I was referring to for clarity. The in-quest event was the social gathering where Mathilde met the druchii diplomats, specifically the part where Sarvoi embarrassed the druchii sorceress who was bragging about her magical knowledge.
Yes, I had quoted that. I know that Mathilde could give Sarvoi lessons. I'm asking about the notion that she can give the Druchii lessons. When did Sarvoi 'school' the Druchii diplomat?I edited my post to include the exact exchange I was referring to for clarity.
You found the quote I was thinking of when I said she could school them. Sarvoi schooled the diplomat, and when Boney was asked if Mathilde learned anything from watching he said that Mathilde could teach Sarvoi how to do it better - the implication was pretty clear that in a dhar for dhar lore contest, Mathilde might have Sarvoi beat.
I edited my post to include the exact exchange I was referring to for clarity. The in-quest event was the social gathering where Mathilde met the druchii diplomats, specifically the part where Sarvoi embarrassed the druchii sorceress who was bragging about her magical knowledge.
But you know, again, "different knowledge is still good knowledge even if one body is better than another". Just because Sarvoi was able to point out that the sorceress had been deliberately trained wrong doesn't mean he's discarded the possibility that she knows something he doesn't.