Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
The joke is you will get a book with nothing but black markers used for sensoring, or notifying that certain marker means 'Fck Stop! And do it fckn now!'

Not really. You could for instance figure out how to better manipulate Waystones with human magic through knowing the languages of both of its builders. If you then teach that spell to the colleges it's fine because spells are inherently black boxed, locked behind the maker's understanding of magic. We can use Arcane Khazalid as an analytical tool to figure out aspects of the world previously closed to us and then design our own magics to actually interact with said unraveled mysteries. As long as the person who uses the latter can't work backwards and figure out the language we used we are golden.
 
Last edited:
The Book of Ashur is bound in Beastmen skin and very strongly suggests that the reader should go to the Chaos Gods for further magical insight, and the Book of Secrets is so tainted that it mutates anyone that tries to use the secrets it contains. They are SUPER forbidden, and for damn good reason.
Ok, to be fair on the Grimoire section of the Wiki 80% of the named books are either Chaos Magic, Dark Magic or both... The only ones that can be considered neutral are the Book of Hoeth and the Lermontov's Grimoire, and both the Liber Chaotica and Liber Malefic that are not illegal but you need to be a Veteran Witch Hunter or to be granted special permission to read them.

@BoneyM given our position would it be possible to get access to the Liber Chaotica and Liber Malefic? Would be possible/legal to put a bounty on the Lermontov's Grimoire?
 
Last edited:
Ok, to be fair on the Grimoire section of the Wiki 80% of the named books are either Chaotic, Dark Magic or both... The only ones that can be considered neutral are the Book of Hoeth and the Lermontov's Grimoire, and both the Liber Chaotica and Liber Malefic that are not illegal but you need to be a Veteran Witch Hunter or to be granted special permission to read them.

@BoneyM given our position would it be possible to get access to the Liber Chaotica and Liber Malefic? Would be possible/legal to put a bounty on the Lermontov's Grimoire?

The Libers are controlled by the Cult of Sigmar, so no. And I'm really not a fan of any magics that provide instant cures for mental illness, so Lermontov's is out.
 
The Libers are controlled by the Cult of Sigmar, so no. And I'm really not a fan of any magics that provide instant cures for mental illness, so Lermontov's is out.
Equivalent Exchange. It 'cures' a mental illness by shifting it to a different at least as bad mental illness. Or two.

Or it 'instantly' cures it, so long as you follow the prescribed behavior and herbal regimen from the appendix for the next five or ten years.

Or Nope always works.
 
The vote seems pretty settled. I wonder what it says about Mathy that as soon as she sees magical artifacts to buy she goes: 'Take my money, take it damn it!'

Great respect for the Vow of Poverty or certainty that the gold will keep on flowing?
 
The vote seems pretty settled. I wonder what it says about Mathy that as soon as she sees magical artifacts to buy she goes: 'Take my money, take it damn it!'

Great respect for the Vow of Poverty or certainty that the gold will keep on flowing?
Eh, the VoP is there to ensure that there's no sudden monopolizing of important empire trade or sudden beggaring of people. Spending well-earned money on artifacts from outside the empire doesn't really count.
 
Not really. You could for instance figure out how to better manipulate Waystones with human magic through knowing the languages of both of its builders. If you then teach that spell to the colleges it's fine because spells are inherently black boxed, locked behind the maker's understanding of magic. We can use Arcane Khazalid as an analytical tool to figure out aspects of the world previously closed to us and then design our own magics to actually interact with said unraveled mysteries. As long as the person who uses the latter can't work backwards and figure out the language we used we are golden.
Ah, i see, rather then using the Elven language or Elven language ++ (magick/lingua praestantia), this is like learning/ disecting the language using the more precise language of the Dwarves.

Basically you make a very simplified/for dummies guide on how to turn on/off the waystones.
 
Last edited:
To go to the classic software explanation: we can use the dwarf programming language, but we can't ship out the source code, or any artefact that could be reverse engineered.
Only dlls.
 
@Garlak I was not really talking about what happened in reality. Obviously the High King is not looting the other Old Holds of magic, we read his interlude. I was trying to deduce what Mathy and Belegar might see if they looked at his words with the preexisting bias in the matter.
But Thorek's conversation -- and I feel like Mathilde's own bias would be "Bullshit the High King is stealing stuff, I think I just fucked up and convinced Belegar of Thorgrim's further ill intent when it's not true." Even in the scene where she reports it and Belegar has his rant, she mentions feeling bad and not wanting to be praised for it; that leads me to suspect that Belegar and Mathilde have preexisting biases concerning Thorgrim, yes... but very different biases -- enlightens things a good bit.

The fact that she had had the Gunnars scene, about Karag Dum, just the turn before Thorek... that kind of neatly formed an example of "This is what people believe about people from Karag Dum" followed up by a "... And this is why they believe that way" revelation/explanation from Thorek.

So anyway yeah, I think I stand by my conclusion. I think Mathilde is more likely to be put in mind of Thorek's observation on the Cult of Thungni and the resultant cultural shifts and beliefs of the Karaz Ankor, and how the return of Karag Dum might affect all this. And she might worry about new political ripples and tsunamis being caused.

Although there's another possible angle to this, too. Namely that... because Karag Dum's people know what the Waystones are doing... That means that Karag Dum can potentially prove themselves via evidence. And if they can potentially lean on the High King to do so, then... they'd have a hell of a character witness. (The High King on the other hand, would probably rather not have a huge divide explode in the middle of the Cult of Thungni or the Karaz Ankor. On the other hand, he probably realizes that it'd probably be unreasonable for Karag Dum to be sanguine and okay with their reputation in the rest of the Karaz Ankor, especially after having just come out of a 200-year siege by Chaos. Coming out of 200 years of siege, only to be looked at by suspicion or confusion and uncertainty by most younglings? They're not going to feel okay with their pride and standing being besmirched like that.)

We might, potentially, have a role to play in Dwarf politics after this whole thing. ><

In trying to keep things from blowing up or breaking up. If the Runelords raise a bit stink or something. Or if the Karag Dum people make demands or whatever.

... And meanwhile, there are people who are young and enthusiastic, or are fired up by the reclamation of Holds and are just excited to be doing stuff or are radicals or whatever or are apart from all this being Imperial or young Dwarfs or... I dunno.

Thorgrim may have quite a lot of balancing and delicate diplomacy on his hands. On the one hand, it's probably better than a slow inevitable doom that he can do nothing about. On the other hand, how shitty would it feel to have dodged inevitable demise by sheer luck, only to then fumble sticking the landing and have things break apart on your watch anyway?

God, I hope we find out enough about Waystones -- and Dwarf politics and attitudes in general -- in Karag Dum that we can take our knowledge and stuff back to Belegar, and convince him not to exacerbate things with Thorgrim and convince him about what is really going on and what is really at stake. Because Belegar certainly could probably makes things worse, no doubt. Especially if he acts out of opportunism, to take shots at Thorgrim in exchange for concessions or just to dunk on him a bit, and isn't aware of the greater Karaz Ankor-wide diplomatic and national political effects it might have. Or is somewhat aware of it, but takes some sort of "Good riddance to bad rubbish!" conclusion about Thorgrim.


... Hm. Hell, for all we know, it's possible that Thorgrim will start throwing resources towards Vlag and Dum... And Belegar might view that as the exact same sort of "He's only giving resources because it lets him continue harvesting energy!" And make a stink about the distribution of resources and political focus, thinking that the resources and focus could be better spent on closer threats or whatever. ... And Belegar could probably find a lot of support amongst the Runelord-influenced sorts who have reason to be against Karag Dum.

... On the other hand, nah. Belegar was one of the people who provided a dramatically-useful figure to the Expedition; that of Mathilde Weber. And so, Belegar might join in on the Karag Dum side. Because they would have a lot of reason and motivation to be very grateful to him...

... Which might result, amusingly, in a Belegar that is part of a wide-umbrella political faction that includes Thorgrim too. Both Belegar and Thorgrim being pro-Vlag and pro-Dum. And Belegar being annoyed as hell at the fact that he has found himself on the same political/diplomatic side as Thorgrim.

In which case, it might be better to smooth things out between Belegar and Thorgrim, so that they can work together more easily. Because if they are going to be forced to work together anyway, then better that it be smooth-ish cooperation rather than incredibly teeth-grit cooperation.

... Actually, I am really liking -- and finding amusing -- the possibility of Belegar and Thorgrim finding themselves on the same 'side' by happenstance and sheer alignment of politics/economy/Hold-reclamation-stuff.

It's a very tricky and interesting situation. And one which might be nudged one way or another. Thus making it interesting. And also making it a place that we can intervene in, because he have huge Dwarf cred, and have huge favor and friendship with Belegar too. In fact, wouldn't it be funny if King Belegar ended up taking a wife from Karag Dum, as part of this weird new-and-old-Holds-and-High-King political quasi-faction?

...

...

... Just had a thought/realization.

So, uh.

Karag Dum knows a lot about Waystones, right.

Um. So. Who do we know, that would want to know a lot about Waystones?

King Belegar.

I started this off by thinking to myself, after I wrote the latest big paragraph above, with "In fact, wouldn't it be funny if King Belegar ended up taking a wife from Karag Dum?" And then I realized the further implications and consequences of that.

Namely that...

If Belegar, married somebody from Dum, he might potentially gain access to Waystone knowledge.

Hooooly moly. And, in fact, Belegar might even go for it. If he thought that he needed the Waystone knowledge for the good of his people... ... And then found out more of the truth of things, and found out that the whole of Dwarfkind is at stake on the Throne of Power? And that he would have to reorient or hold aside his opinions of Thorgrim and work with him despite his personal feelings towards him, because of how important it is both for Karak Eight Peaks and all of the Karaz Ankor?

Now that's some interesting Drama.

Of course, maybe it won't be Belegar. Maybe it'll be a nephew of his that does it. Or maybe somebody from Kazador's brood, and Belegar gains the knowledge by proxy of the Belegar-Kazador friendship and alliance.

But still.

How interesting all these ideas are.

There's some serious potential for politics, drama, cool stories, cool outcomes, teeth-gritted cooperation, slowly growing trust or affection (between husbands and brides or etc), slowly growing reconciliation (or slowly growing pains and irritations anyway)...

A coalition of the new and the old amongst the Karaz Ankor. And, a question of what the hell does "old" mean anyway, if the "old" is represented by Karak Azul and Karag Dum, and yet they act so weirdly anyway? And even Karaz-a-Karak -- or at least the High King -- is in this faction anyway, but there's definitely friction there, and yet they work together, and yet...

... This could potentially be a pretty exciting and fascinating time for historians of the Karaz Ankor to be alive in. So much potential history being made.

And not just dramatic and almost-mythical rescues and reclamations of Karaks. But also more... normal history. Normal, yet the sort that the history and spirit of a people and a nation are made of.
 
Ah, i see, rather then using the Elven language or Elven language ++ (magick/lingua praestantia), this is like learning/ disecting the language using the more precise language of the Dwarves.

Basically you make a very simplified/for dummies guide on how to turn on/off the waystones.

It's less that Arcane Khazalid is better than Anoqeyån and more than both of them inform how the Waystones were built. In knowing both Mathilde would have more linguistic insight into the project than any wizard since the archmages of the Golden Age. No elf since has been taught Arcane Khazalid and no Runesmith knows Anoqeyån.
 
Something else to consider, whilst we might technically not be allowed to pass on insights gained due to Arcane Khazalid like how would the runesmiths ever know? Ultimately all the shit we know and teach is grey magic guild secrets or colleges of magic guild secrets. The simple fact that in theory something we pass on couldn't be known with out that insight is irrelevant in the face of the fact that our college knowledge is utterly inscrutable to rune smiths.
 
It's less that Arcane Khazalid is better than Anoqeyån and more than both of them inform how the Waystones were built. In knowing both Mathilde would have more linguistic insight into the project than any wizard since the archmages of the Golden Age. No elf since has been taught Arcane Khazalid and no Runesmith knows Anoqeyån.
This is a clue for a spinoff quest.

Should Mathilde adopt an Elven child ( one she freed from slavery for instance) and taught in both the art of magic and the art of runesmithing...

Edit: and dedicated to Ranald...
 
Something else to consider, whilst we might technically not be allowed to pass on insights gained due to Arcane Khazalid like how would the runesmiths ever know? Ultimately all the shit we know and teach is grey magic guild secrets or colleges of magic guild secrets. The simple fact that in theory something we pass on couldn't be known with out that insight is irrelevant in the face of the fact that our college knowledge is utterly inscrutable to rune smiths.
I don't want to betray the trust of Belegar and Kragg and Thorek and the Dwarfs like that.

Sometimes being a Grey Wizard means being about keeping secrets rather than being about lying and covering your butt via technicalities.

And also, just as a general thing, I'm a bit skeptical of a 'But who will know? Who would it hurt? It doesn't matter, does it?' approach to things. Just... that I feel there are some lines in places, and that even if you are from the Order or Wind of people who love smudging lines and declaring 'They're really more like 'guidelines' anyway' it's still important to keep some things intact or keep some stability or honor grounded or whatever.

... Also, just... People that focus solely on a 'What can I get away with?' and 'Does this benefit me/my people?' are maybe not the most reliable or good of people to deal with. This isn't just deontology tho', as... Egh. As avoiding slippery slopes or something? Or perhaps just avoiding feeling bad by doing a shitty thing while going 'But who care, really' about it to compound the bad-feeling; that sort of thing feels like a level of... lack of care about people or what people think or the worlds and realities they live in and the beliefs they come to hold... I mean, maybe if it was a singular really big and important piece of thing we needed to do in order to accomplish a specific thing, maybe it'd be okay. But just assuming we could do it as much as we like, no, I don't like that.

Or more paranoidly, the more you make assumptions about how far you can go with things like this, and how far you can get away with things, the worse the potential fallout will be if/when some kind of Unknown Unknown bites you on the ass. (Which can be stuff like "Oh shit, we didn't think about the fact that X faction could get access to Wizards, and thus they were able to trace our theft by using magic, despite the fact we pretty thoroughly covered our physical trail!" Or just... y'know. The equivalent of things when we found out about the constant Hobgoblin assassins and how BoneyM said "It came about by spending a couple minutes thinking 'if this was Chaos Dwarf quest and the thread wanted to send assassins into the Empire, how would they do it'. Which is a level of creativity people seem really unwilling to ascribe to any faction but their own.")


... Also. Are you sure that you would trust the Grey College, or Colleges of Magic, with whatever secrets you would spread? Are you absolutely sure you'd be willing to trust everybody with the secrets you'll share?

That, too, is another issue. And also a Grey Wizard issue too. That of trusting others. Especially trusting them with secrets or forbidden/Guild-secret knowledge. How much can you trust them?
 
Last edited:
Halfling assassins and how BoneyM said "It came about by spending a couple minutes thinking 'if this was Chaos Dwarf quest and the thread wanted to send assassins into the Empire, how would they do it'. Which is a level of creativity people seem really unwilling to ascribe to any faction but their own.")
Hobgoblin assassins.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top