- Pronouns
- He/Him
50% surcharge to construction costs, including time to build.Remind me, how much do prototype vs production costs of ships differ?
50% surcharge to construction costs, including time to build.Remind me, how much do prototype vs production costs of ships differ?
Gotta second this.Everyone, the Carbon is a uniquely bad choice for the Orions. You're costing them half a new light frigate extra and giving them a worse ship in exchange. Please reconsider your votes.
e: Unless you're worried about 1T, but I would ask you to show your work if so.
C | S | H | L | P | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
br Cost | sr Cost | Weight | Build Time | Officer | Enlisted | Technicians |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
280 | 190-200 | 2773kt | 4.5y | 6 | 7 | 6 |
1.5x SR, BR, and build time by default, with Rapid Prototyping tech that's coming up making it 1.25x.Remind me, how much do prototype vs production costs of ships differ?
According to the options the Cats will have to prototype it anyway. On the plus side the Cats have resources and crew leaking out of their cat-ears right now. The Yrillians are also building the Carbon according to the post and they are going to have to prototype it too. It looks to me like everyone has to prototype the ship.
And why on earth would the Orions ever want to build more than 2, or maybe 3 total Keplers? They have that many combat frigates right now, and scout/science-exploration frigates aren't needed in that amount. I could see the STO building 4 total Keplers, the Orions are a third their size.
An All-10s Capital will be very difficult, as we probably won't have the hull tech for that for ages. If we design one as our tech stands it will be a very unbalanced ship, ironically. I would suggest the Megatortoise fiat modification for the Ked Paddah, so consult with the Rigellians.
Ahem.A 10 flat capital? As in, completely flat? Is 10H even possible with out tech?
Leslie:I don't actually have a good argument here. I just like the name more. (Besides, Star Trek ships just don't have the mixed coloring that would be appropriate for the other name.)
The multiple prototypes i recall are for the JAFFA where the apatia version needed one due their queen based crews.Mmmmm, I suppose it's hard to tell who prototypes the ship. If the Yrillians are eating the cost then it's better, but I definitely wouldn't want the Orions to do so, not when they're already operating the Kepler. In some cases we've had multiple polities prototype a class, which is where my reticence comes from.
Mmmmm, I suppose it's hard to tell who prototypes the ship. If the Yrillians are eating the cost then it's better, but I definitely wouldn't want the Orions to do so, not when they're already operating the Kepler. In some cases we've had multiple polities prototype a class, which is where my reticence comes from.
I like the Miranda-B as a concept quite a bit, but I'm concerned about it's future refitability in the event of new builds, especially for fleets like the Laio, where they're going to need that ship to last a long time in service.For anyone interested, the Miranda-B is likely to be a 20br 10sr refit that adds +1C +2S +1P +3D. We could go for an extra +1 to a stat, but that likely increases the refit cost by 10sr. The refit's main benefits are in how super cheap it is, and how Starfleet + Member Fleets have a ton of Mirandas that could benefit.
Firstly, we may have a war blow up in the next 2-3 years, so we do need some short-term emphasis on numbers and short term capability even at the expense of long term optimization.I like the Miranda-B as a concept quite a bit, but I'm concerned about it's future refitability in the event of new builds, especially for fleets like the Laio, where they're going to need that ship to last a long time in service.
You're not wrong about the Miranda-B, of course. But I feel obliged to point out that that specific projected Mielab-A is aimed at minimising refit costs for the Amarki Arsenal scout/skirmish frigate (15BR/10SR), not getting the max economically possible stats out of the frame on an 'Export Order New Build' model- a design goal that I've not explored.The projected Mielab-A is C3 S6 H2 L3 P2 D5, or +2S -1C for +15 SR over a Miranda-B.
Mmmmm, I suppose it's hard to tell who prototypes the ship. If the Yrillians are eating the cost then it's better, but I definitely wouldn't want the Orions to do so, not when they're already operating the Kepler. In some cases we've had multiple polities prototype a class, which is where my reticence comes from.
Ahem.
All this being said, I wouldn't be at all surprised if the Ked Peddah have a somewhat variant tech tree compared to us, probably including more safety equipment and hull reinforcement. Same goes for the ISC, who also have a safety focus and also have a "flat stat" ship design focus. Our designs make it harder and less cost-effective to add Hull than to add Shielding, but that doesn't necessarily mean everyone else is playing by exactly the same rulebook.
Ked Paddah | Aggadah Refits | Orah Refits | All-10s Capital |
I guess we won't be pulling a canon Federation which was probably rolling around with a Miranda-D given that they were still building the thing post DS9.