Very unrealistic, we are invited into naggarynthe, eike is not and therefore only allowed into lothernif we send eike, how realistic would it be to get her into a naggarynthe library fir most of her stay? asking for a friend.
I assume that it is a shrine for the god of the dead.There's also something called the "Shrine of Remembrance", which is denoted with the rune Nastirr. Not sure what that's about.
I want to do both an ithilmar and an ore trade route action in the same turn, maybe combined with getting to know house Miriel in order to target them to flip to being less isolationist.I would be happy to hear feedback on either plan. Does anyone have any suggestions for determining which EIC action is more popular besides just putting both plans out and seeing if either of them do well during the voting?
There's actually two elf Gods that could refer to - Ereth-Khial, Goddess of the underworld, and Morai-Heg, Goddess of death. Neither is in the inner ring of the mandala so either would be an exception to the trend, and I also can't see Nastirr in either of their sigils. A major Asur shrine to Morai-Heg makes more sense than one to Ereth-Khial, and there is a part of Morai-Heg's sigil that somewhat resembles a small part of Nastirr, but it's a pretty big stretch.
@Boney
Since the flex and the BOOK are coming, interest in AV among Colleges will probably skyrocket. Asp's situation with constant AV yield is unique, but can apparition be hunted down and rendered into AV, much like you can hunt down a deer for its meat? I don't propose Mathilde do it (since she accidentally invented animal husbandry), but can that become a viable source of AV for the Colleges for their own research/orb production?
The thing is if there IS they probably aren't advertising that fact.We should codify Knightbringer and drop it at the same time as we drop the AV book so people mistake us for an expe-
Hold on, maybe we are an expert on apparitions? We're making orbs of sorcery out of one and invented an entire spell based on another. Is there anyone in the colleges besides Gehenna who's got more apparition credentials than Mathilde?
This has come up a few times with people considering that if you kill the apparition, the AV would lose whatever connection it has to the apparition and disappear like daemon bodies do after they die and coming up with elaborate if disturbing plans to create apparition blood farms.@Boney
Since the flex and the BOOK are coming, interest in AV among Colleges will probably skyrocket. Asp's situation with constant AV yield is unique, but can apparition be hunted down and rendered into AV, much like you can hunt down a deer for its meat? I don't propose Mathilde do it (since she accidentally invented animal husbandry), but can that become a viable source of AV for the Colleges for their own research/orb production?
The thing is if there IS they probably aren't advertising that fact.
Yes, but they explicitly wanted us to be circumspect about where we got it because that "probably not" was not "definitely not" enough for their liking.That the Golds were at all willing to trade this secret suggests that the likely reaction we'd receive is probably not of the heads, spikes, walls variety.
With that said, I've been wondering what will happen to the Ulgu chains binding the Rider to Mathilde's soul next time she gets daemon checked with Hysh.
Yes, but they explicitly wanted us to be circumspect about where we got it because that "probably not" was not "definitely not" enough for their liking.
Aaaand because of that, if there ARE people who know more about Apparitions than us, we probably wouldn't know, because they aren't advertising that fact.Sure, this one goes into the classified pile.
Need to know basis and the templars don't need to know.
Boney's already said that Apparitions would be shielded by the soul of the wizard binding them so Hysh won't banish them or anything.That the Golds were at all willing to trade this secret suggests that the likely reaction we'd receive is probably not of the heads, spikes, walls variety.
With that said, I've been wondering what will happen to the Ulgu chains binding the Rider to Mathilde's soul next time she gets daemon checked with Hysh.
I mean, Max might like poking around trying to learn about what the smiths of Lothern get up to with magic.Johann and Eike would seem appropriate for many of these, but does anyone have thoughts for what Max and potentially Egrimm might find useful?
That the Golds needed to be persuaded with fairly potent bribe and then asked to not be mentioned in whatever spellwork she invents suggests that heads, spikes and walls are definitely an option if the academic or religious opinions on apparitions swung the other way however.That the Golds were at all willing to trade this secret suggests that the likely reaction we'd receive is probably not of the heads, spikes, walls variety.
Asked and answered by the GM. Deamoncheckers don't work on apparations. Only some other spell that banishes creatures of immeterum works on unbound apparations and not at all on bound ones.With that said, I've been wondering what will happen to the Ulgu chains binding the Rider to Mathilde's soul next time she gets daemon checked with Hysh.
It is more likely to be religous than academic since deamon banishing spells don't work on apparation which means there is academic proof.most likely just a very dangerous infinitesimaly small probability, but noone in academia wants to be left out of potential discoveries and the fact that they specifically asked to be is fairly alarming.
The golds/Eike/Project/Webmat can survive 3 months back in the empire without us.
And we can survive a trip to Ulthuan without dragging half the cast with us.
It feels like people are searching for a reason to drag others with us, instead of having one.
If my stain remover doesn't work on particular kind of stains it doesn't mean that they aren't actually stains, it means that the stain remover is faulty. Defining what is and is not a daemon by the results of the daemon-banishing spell is putting cart before the horse. I agree that metaphysical difference exists, but that alone doesn't mean that apparitions aren't daemons - I'm pretty sure that daemons of the different gods are also different from each other.Asked and answered by the GM. Deamoncheckers don't work on apparations. Only some other spell that banishes creatures of immeterum works on unbound apparations and not at all on bound ones.
So there is actually metaphisical difference between deamon and apparation. Which means our notdeamons are really not deamons.
It is more likely to be religous than academic since deamon banishing spells don't work on apparation which means there is academic proof.