Oh, is that right? Based on what, our one meeting with him? We don't know anything about the man. We've only ever spoken to people who dislike him. What if he's got the army completely on his side, and Boris is a terrible general? What if Boris tries to do his coup, and it turns out that he's got barely any supporters besides the Ice Witches?
That is just incorrect. We've had more than just the one meeting with the man, we've spoken to many people across Kislev society from multilple strata nobody likes the Tsar and we know that the army is not all on his side.
Also know Boris isn't a bad general, we know he's got a lot of support in the army and the Kislevite people and that he's got way more support than just the Ice Witches, the Ungol's love the man. Those are not groups that traditionally get along.
Yes, out of all the Kislevites we have spoken to we have only ever spoken to people who dislike him.
True out sample size if not the best, but it is also 100% Anti-Vlad.
It's also a very wide section.
We've met boyars thousands of miles from the centre of power who don't like him and we've met people right in the centre who don't. The high born and the low, those with very good reason to dislike him and those who'd not even think about him unless he was doing a good or bad job.
Their assessment is bad.
I'm trying really hard not to have your tone bias me further towards No. You repeatedly seem to insinuate that someone else is arguing in bad faith when I really don't see it and making the whole discussion more heated.
Not that my individual opinion matters much, since Yes is likely to win. But I'd still like it if you tone the heat down a bit, just for my own comfort.
This is not about advocacy for yes or no, its about keeping the record straight and in the interest of that yes I do think they are arguing in bad faith. I think they are shifting goal posts engaging in fallacies, intentionally misrepresenting information, leaving out bits that don't support their narrative and at times just making things up.
I apologise if that is making you uncomfortable and will try to calm down, but it is just very...like why? If its just their opinion argue from that, don't try to crowbar what is known to fit the conclusion you want to reach.
Please don't put words in my mouth. I'm not saying that Boris is evil. But we're putting a lot of trust in a guy whom we barely know. Yes, of course we are 100% sure that he's exhausted every single other path before him - why? What we do know is that he's unwilling to negotiate (if that's indeed the case), and that by itself is very suspicious. If he's really only doing this at as the last resort, he should be perfectly willing and even happy to debate other possible courses of action and show why they don't work, and if we mention something that actually might work and he hasn't tried, he should be happy to try it. This way he'll prove that he's really speaking the truth. If he's unwilling to do even that, then I think there's every indication that he's being shifty. He'd obviously prefer to silently assassinate Vladimir rather than go to war against him, and in order to achieve that it's not going to be super difficult for him to attempt to solve this problem in other ways to our satisfaction.
Fair, but the difference between evil and untrustworthy is essentially meaningless here and there's a very simple way we can figure out if he's exhausted every other path.
Do you think he wants to kill his father?
Do you think that he wants to murder the man who raised him, who he presumably knows better than almost anyone?
Do you think he hasn't considered every possible alternative and concluded that no there is no way to resolve it in a manner which solves the fundamental issue.
Which is that his father is weakening Kislev. The army might not be weakening, but it isn't getting stronger, while everything else is crumbling and his father will not take the actions needed to resolve this.
How do you solve this problem when his father will not take action, will not accept external support, will not listen to reform, will do administration, will not
do the necessary work of government.
Something Boris knows! What resources available to Mathilde can resolve this fundamental issue of personality and priorities?
I can't think of anything and your previous suggestions all hit on those same issues.
So instead you assume suspicion and conspiracy, when we have no reason to assume that.
You are advocating that Boris is suspicious based on what? That we weren't shown everything he has tried to do to persuade his father? That's not suspicious, its just tragic.