Mopman43
Mountain-Hermit of Nitpeak
- Location
- Vermont
It'd be inaccurate though.
As the length of a Warhammer Fantasy thread increases, the odds of it not arguing about the War of Vengeance approaches 0.
It'd be inaccurate though.
I mean if you are looking for first causes I think not admitting that you even had a civil war and thus that elves who do not serve the Phoenix King even exist is the worse sin. It is reasonable from the dwarfs perspective that the organized elven group attacking their caravans belonged to the only elven state they knew about.
The beard shaving that was a response to the dwarves rocking up and being insulting shitheads? Yes, clearly it is the elves who were trying to burn bridges.Also the beard shaving was such a pointless act of escalation that one almost has to be impressed by how fast those bridges were burned.
Yes, harming an ambassador is indeed the definition of burning bridges.The beard shaving that was a response to the dwarves rocking up and being insulting shitheads? Yes, clearly it is the elves who were trying to burn bridges.
It is, however, incumbent on the ambassador to be diplomatic. The dwarves were not, and therefore cannot cry foul when they were responded to in kind.Yes, harming an ambassador is indeed the definition of burning bridges.
Like, IRL wars are started over that.
It's really not.It is, however, incumbent on the ambassador to be diplomatic. The dwarves were not, and therefore cannot cry foul when they were responded to in kind.
The advantage is whatever they gain from the next trade—gold, resources, information, favours, etc. The 'who' could be anybody, and the exact vector is unimportant. The point is that once information spreads, it can reach very distant places, and we have no control over that spread. We don't magically learn about them doing it if it happens, so we would have no reason to stop trading until well after the fact.To who would exactly sell the Druuchii said information and why? Doing so would probably mean we won't trade with them anymore, besides it wouldn't give any advantage to them.
I also feel a lot of people are taking one trade one Lady Magister of the Empire does as what the entire Empire as a polity does when that is very much not the case.
We'll never know, will we?And I'm supposed to believe that the dwarves would apply the same standard if a hypothetical elf ambassador had started hurling insults at Gotrek the Petty? Pull the other one, it has bells on.
I think if you've devolved to "well the other side would have done the same thing", you've probably lost the original argument.And I'm supposed to believe that the dwarves would apply the same standard if a hypothetical elf ambassador had started hurling insults at Gotrek the Petty? Pull the other one, it has bells on.
That's the thing with ambassadors, if they start saying shit you can just send them home and never allow them to come back, but attacking any diplomat is an instant act of war.And I'm supposed to believe that the dwarves would apply the same standard if a hypothetical elf ambassador had started hurling insults at Gotrek the Petty? Pull the other one, it has bells on.
I am saying that the "you don't harm an ambassador" argument rests on the ambassador actually serving as one, not being an insulting shithead and claiming diplomatic privilege anyway.I think if you've devolved to "well the other side would have done the same thing", you've probably lost the original argument.
If the ambassador had cut Caledor's ears off, then you'd have an argument.So the dwarves can insult the elves all they like, but the elves can't insult the dwarves by giving them a good trim? Got it.
I mean he did come on account of what seemed to be elves attacking dwarven caravans which were actually Malekith so while i wouldn't count being discourteous and rude to the high elves of all people as a smart thing Caledor still decided to keep his mouth shut on the Malekith rebel problem and from that point on it's war unless you want to advocate a foreign nations citizen slaughtering your owns deserves any less then a grudging war to push back this foreign enemy.It is, however, incumbent on the ambassador to be diplomatic. The dwarves were not, and therefore cannot cry foul when they were responded to in kind.
Your point is? Nation states can genocide other races and nations people and get away with insulting the ambassador when they come time to ask why their slaughtering their people?So the dwarves can insult the elves all they like, but the elves can't insult the dwarves by giving them a good trim? Got it.
Er. Beards are extremely culturally important to Dwarves. Immensely so. Fundamentally so. Forcefully shaving a Dwarf is on par with brutal mutilation of the highest order with no true way of fixing it.So the dwarves can insult the elves all they like, but the elves can't insult the dwarves by giving them a good trim? Got it.
To the Dwarfs?
To put this into context, the guy who got his beard shaved became a Slayer.Er. Beards are extremely culturally important to Dwarves. Immensely so. Fundamentally so. Forcefully shaving a Dwarf is on par with brutal mutilation of the highest order with no true way of fixing it.
Hell even for normal people. Having one's hair forcefully shaved isn't exactly fun.
By that logic any country could send another's ambassador back home tarred and feathered and it wouldn't be an issue since there's no harm.
If you're going to respond to my posts, please actually quote me.
I mean, it's assault and battery in modern day real world law.