Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Does anyone know canon examples for this? I know of the Spider Goddess, but other than giving easier access to some truly foul monstrosities she doesn't seem in any way more worrisome than Gork and Mork.

And if there's no canon examples, could you share one or two of those that Mathilde might have had in mind when she thought that, @Boney?
There's the Spider-god, maybe the Bad Moon. 8E just generically says they have a pantheon. I think Chaos worshipping Orcs have been in canon before. They might find Khaine attractive. The Hobgoblin Khanate is closely intertwined with the Chaos Dwarfs so maybe some Hashut worship?
 
What's a way we can use a Great Deed to acquire an income stream besides grabbing a new fief? With fiefs, we're obligated to reinvest the funds back into the fief, so we'll need something else.
...is there a reason you think a new income stream would be a good use of a Great Deed? AFAICT we're not limited enough on funds at present that it'd really be a worthwhile exchange. I'd much rather reserve such a valuable resource for when we need to solve a problem our other tools (e.g. not inconsiderable existing wealth) can't.
 
What's a way we can use a Great Deed to acquire an income stream besides grabbing a new fief? With fiefs, we're obligated to reinvest the funds back into the fief, so we'll need something else.

As far as I know, we're not obligated to reinvest fief funds back into the fief, at least to the degree we do at present. We only do that at the moment because Mathilde has unreasonable amounts of alternative wealth we're still working through.

The fief exists for Mathilde's benefit, as her subjects, and Mathilde has a responsibility to the fief, as their lord. As long as those interests are in balance, everything is fine.

We can't loot the place year after year, leaving nothing for our subjects, or we'll get the Witch Hunters and Grey Order and Roswita on our back wondering why a Grey Wizard is flaunting the vow of poverty. But modest taxes to fund Mathilde's official duties as a Wizard are the responsible and expected thing to do.

Quite frankly, other nobles would likely be more suspicious if they knew nearly everything has been reinvested into the fief for the last decade. 'Peasants' don't know what to do with that sort of money, after all, only their social betters. Letting the rabble have power over tax money in that way is a suspiciously Ranaldian thing to do, and that's very bad. It gives the peasantry unsettling ideas.
 
...is there a reason you think a new income stream would be a good use of a Great Deed? AFAICT we're not limited enough on funds at present that it'd really be a worthwhile exchange. I'd much rather reserve such a valuable resource for when we need to solve a problem our other tools (e.g. not inconsiderable existing wealth) can't.
A Great Deed is useable in the Empire and nowhere else. Unless we plan to limit the geographic scope of the project to the Empire's borders, we're going to need out of pocket expenses to achieve our goals, whether that be for bribes, buying land with waystones on them, hiring outsiders for jobs, etc. We spent 2000 GC on a laboratory that we otherwise couldn't get with a Great Deed. I doubt it'll be the last big purchase we'll make for the waystone project.

The sooner we increase our passive income, the more we'll be able to afford any waystone project expenses later on. Worst case scenario, it just so happens that we did indeed spend all the money on the waystone project we'll ever have to spend, in which case we can get more books as a consolation prize.

As far as I know, we're not obligated to reinvest fief funds back into the fief, at least to the degree we do at present.
I don't mean legally, I mean morally. The point of taxing a fief is to improve the fief or improve your ability to defend the fief. If it's not doing either, it's unethical to spend it. Even going around being an official wizard for the Empire isn't a legitimate use of the money unless it's to the benefit of the fief, because that's how the feudal contract works.

Quite frankly, other nobles would likely be more suspicious if they knew nearly everything has been reinvested into the fief for the last decade. 'Peasants' don't know what to do with that sort of money, after all, only their social betters. Letting the rabble have power over tax money in that way is a suspiciously Ranaldian thing to do, and that's very bad. It gives the peasantry unsettling ideas.
No. This form of argument is distasteful to me. This is such a completely imagined non-issue.
 
Last edited:
The sooner we increase our passive income, the more we'll be able to afford any waystone project expenses later on. Worst case scenario, it just so happens that we did indeed spend all the money on the waystone project we'll ever have to spend, in which case we can get more books as a consolation prize.
which out of pocket expenses do you think we will have that we cant shunt to the colleges through web-mat or that wont be picked up by our hosts? the only thing we really paid for was furnishing for the hq is laurelorn...

edit: also we really should visit the fief at some point... its been like ten years...
 
Last edited:
which out of pocket expenses do you think we will have that we cant shunt to the colleges through web-mat or that wont be picked up by our hosts? the only thing we really paid for was furnishing for the hq is laurelorn...
Our host is Laurelorn and we still had to pay for Laurelorn equipment with our personal money. The other contributors aren't even hosting so they'll certainly never financially contribute to the project. The only College money we can spend is for the wages of web-mat employees, nothing else. The entire financial burden of the project is on Mathilde's personal money.
 
Canonically, Horstmann defected before even joining the Colleges, and Boney has previously said that the timeline butterflies start in 2450, when Mathilde is born, not when the quest starts in 2470.
That can't be canon. This update says that Egrimm is young, whereas he'd be somewhere in his 50s at least if he was High Luminary in 2457.
Well, there have been butterflies of course, notably in his origin story (DL Egrimm left home as a child and was drawn to the college by the White Wind AKA "seeing the light" whilst canon Egrimm was more or less abducted off the streets by Alric), but there's also the fact that Alric appears to have been holding him back for one reason or another, hence why he's only just reached Lord Magister status.
The main discrepancy I'm trying to reconcile is that canon OTL Egrimm's betrayal happened on 2457 IC according to historical records, which means OTL Egrimm is older and started his wizard career much earlier than in quest.
To put that into perspective, OTL Egrimm would be Magister Patriarch while Mathilde was still 4 years old, since Egrimm's backstory says he spent at least 3 years subverting the Light Order using his Patriarch position.

In the quest, Egrimm is described as appearing youthful and a contemporary peer to Mathilde. From my perspective, the only way that would fit is if Egrimm was born later/started his wizard career later, essentially de-aging him and shifting his origin point later in the time period. Because otherwise Egrimm should be at least 20 years older than Mathilde, with the requisite history that would entail.

@Boney would you mind weighing in on this? It's pretty clear that Quest Egrimm diverges from his canon counterpart, would that mean his age has been altered and make him younger too?
 
Last edited:
I don't mean legally, I mean morally. The point of taxing a fief is to improve the fief or improve your ability to defend the fief. If it's not doing either, it's unethical to spend it. Even going around being an official wizard for the Empire isn't a legitimate use of the money unless it's to the benefit of the fief, because that's how the feudal contract works.

Oh, I see. Then yes, I agree reinvestment is the moral thing to do.
 
I don't mean legally, I mean morally. The point of taxing a fief is to improve the fief or improve your ability to defend the fief. If it's not doing either, it's unethical to spend it. Even going around being an official wizard for the Empire isn't a legitimate use of the money unless it's to the benefit of the fief, because that's how the feudal contract works.

This is an incredibly narrow reading of how we're allowed to spend the money, it's fine if that's your personal take but I wouldn't by any means call it something we're required to do or the only ethical way to spend it.
 
I don't mean legally, I mean morally. The point of taxing a fief is to improve the fief or improve your ability to defend the fief. If it's not doing either, it's unethical to spend it. Even going around being an official wizard for the Empire isn't a legitimate use of the money unless it's to the benefit of the fief, because that's how the feudal contract works.
Not true. The feudal contract exists between a noble and their liege. In Mathilde's case this is (AFAIK) Roswita. Mathidle owes Roswita fealty, taxes and services (prominently military but also judicial and administrative). Roswita owes Mathilde justice, a fief, and protection. What exists between Mathilde and those living in the fief is a form of manorialism, where Mathilde owns the land and they effectively pay her rent to use it to grow food and build houses and such. Not the same thing.
 
I don't mind the idea of increasing our passive income gain, but Great Deeds do not grow on trees.

The slow but steady path to increasing passive income would be spending AP on further improving the EIC and its profits/stability. The biggest issue would be convincing people to vote on using more than our free AP per turn on it.

Like, I really get the temptation, but in this case I want to imagine that Mathilde is thinking like the dwarf that she is people say she is and think long-term on this. Let's keep the GD in our back-pocket.
 
Not true. The feudal contract exists between a noble and their liege. In Mathilde's case this is (AFAIK) Roswita. Mathidle owes Roswita fealty, taxes and services (prominently military but also judicial and administrative). Roswita owes Mathilde justice, a fief, and protection. What exists between Mathilde and those living in the fief is a form of manorialism, where Mathilde owns the land and they effectively pay her rent to use it to grow food and build houses and such. Not the same thing.
Oh sweet, it's just rent, not taxes. Let's go get our money from the fief, then. Can also freely spend a Great Deed to grab another fief.
 
Last edited:
Our host is Laurelorn and we still had to pay for Laurelorn equipment with our personal money. The other contributors aren't even hosting so they'll certainly never financially contribute to the project. The only College money we can spend is for the wages of web-mat employees, nothing else. The entire financial burden of the project is on Mathilde's personal money.
you haven't actually answered my question. what expenses do you see us having to pay for? and no one has contributed financially to the project yet because the project has yet to start.
 
you haven't actually answered my question. what expenses do you see us having to pay for? and no one has contributed financially to the project yet because the project has yet to start.
That was not your question. You asked me what expenses we couldn't shunt off to contributors and web-mat, to which I said that we can't shunt off any expenses to them. That was an adequate answer.

What kind of expenses the project will rack up is a different question entirely, one with answers I assumed you already read:
we're going to need out of pocket expenses to achieve our goals, whether that be for bribes, buying land with waystones on them, hiring outsiders for jobs, etc.
I also gave the Laurelorn lab as an example of out of pocket expenses we had to pay for.

The project has started. Lay the Foundations isn't the start of the project, it's only the part of the project where people pool their knowledge together. The project began when we decided Laurelorn as the base of its location. We will never receive funding for the project.
 
Re:saddlebags, I think I've found a minor continuity error:
By lunch, you were atop a conjured horse with a new set of robes and a letter of introduction, ordered to ride to Stirland where you were to serve as the Spymaster of the new Elector Count. You knew that, having reached the rank of Journeyman, you were to be sent out into the world to prove yourself, but the abruptness of it took your breath away - and the letter tucked into your saddlebags that you were sternly instructed not to read until you had arrived and were in private filled you with suspicion.
 
you haven't actually answered my question. what expenses do you see us having to pay for? and no one has contributed financially to the project yet because the project has yet to start.
I'm not sure what expenses we're gonna have, but I expect we'll find *something* that could benefit from having cash thrown at it. And I haven't seen the slightest hint that anyone else is willing to front cash for this beyond the time and wages of their representatives. If we come up with a workable prototype, sure, they'll probably pay to make more of them, but until there's an indication of success I doubt anyone's gonna pay up on a project that seems as much of a long shot as this one.
 
I think it's premature to start worrying about finding funding to cover expenses we don't know we'll incur. Planning ahead is one thing, but until the text of the quest makes the specter of further expenses Mathilde cannot deal with loom, it's not worth our time to consider. The thread has a tendency to talk itself into problems.
 
I mean, considering how much cash we spend on books sometimes I was *already* kinda concerned about how well Mathilde's revenue stream would hold up with her not looting anymore dwarven vaults coming up.
 
Wait so is Project Waystone not under WEB-MAT? It's completely under Lady Magister Mathilde Weber (Who is a member of the Colleges of Altdorf(Which is sponsored by the Empire))?
 
I don't mind the idea of increasing our passive income gain, but Great Deeds do not grow on trees.

The slow but steady path to increasing passive income would be spending AP on further improving the EIC and its profits/stability. The biggest issue would be convincing people to vote on using more than our free AP per turn on it.

Like, I really get the temptation, but in this case I want to imagine that Mathilde is thinking like the dwarf that she is people say she is and think long-term on this. Let's keep the GD in our back-pocket.
This is thinking long-term. It's not spending the Great Deed on a lump sum of cash we spend right now, it's passive income so that down the line, when we need money, we have money. If you don't think spending the GD on passive income is the best long-term idea, that's one thing, but I really don't like the statement that it's only a short-term boost to solve an immediate problem.

EDIT:
Wait so is Project Waystone not under WEB-MAT? It's completely under Lady Magister Mathilde Weber (Who is a member of the Colleges of Altdorf(Which is sponsored by the Empire))?
Yes, though Mathilde is not in turn sponsored by the Colleges of Magic. She's a member but she doesn't get money from them.
 
Last edited:
Wait so is Project Waystone not under WEB-MAT? It's completely under Lady Magister Mathilde Weber (Who is a member of the Colleges of Altdorf(Which is sponsored by the Empire))?
WEB-MAT is a branch of the Colleges of Magic, headquartered in Karag Nar. It is a contributing organization to the Waystone Project. Iirc its funding comes from a mix of Altdorf and K8P.
 
No it's just I thought that WEB-MAT had a project called Project Waystone. I didn't realize it was a seperate entity. Can we rename it?

Wait so why the middle-man? What's the difference between hiring them directly to Mathilde compared to hiring them with WEB-MAT which is headed by Mathilde?
 
Last edited:
I've come up with a small list of things we can spend a Great Deed on to get us more money.

-A new fief. Not only will this get us more money, it'll also bless a number of Imperial subjects with our fair and august stewardship. I'm taking the piss but they would in fact be better off under us than most other nobles.
-Hiring the Imperial Engineers School to build and maintain a bridge, lock, road, series of signal towers, or other civil engineering project for the benefit of the EIC. In this update, we see that there's mercantile value in getting information quick. In the case of bridges, roads, and locks, we could charge tolls for non-EIC to use them.
-A trade ship built to our specifications and put under our permanent command. On top of making us money, it also gives us transportation to other parts of the world without being limited by the fuel, size, and weight limits of our gyrocarriage, and depending on the specifications, it could increase the range of the gyrocarriage. The ship could also be used to go and purchase items of interest in other nations we can't get through our current means, like Esoteric Bretonnian literature. It's worth noting that Empire ships can get big, so it wouldn't be making a pittance.
-The Palace of Misery - a very poor and depressing neighbourhood in Altdorf. On its own, it's worthless, but if we upgrade the place with a major investment of money and/or calling in dwarf favours to improve the place, then we'd have an entire neighbourhood of decent homes and businesses paying us rent forever. It'd also be lifting hundreds of families out of poverty.
 
Back
Top