This is a disingenous argument. People get used by gods for enacting their will all the time. You don't even need to worship them, thats just how gods work.We didn't get "caught up" as you say. We were the instrument of Mork exacting his divine justice. That is a little bit more than "caught up" in a ritual. That is a big deal. To be a hand of Mork is to act with the intentions of Mork. Mork does not have good intentions when it comes to the dwarfs. You say this is a setting with gods and magic and demons. How many times do people get possessed by those divine? People normally don't go around claiming to have been possessed. It just doesn't happen. Either it's true and we were a conduit for Mork or we are crazy. And if it is true that we were a conduit for Mork why couldn't Mork make us a conduit again? These are questions that completely change a relationship.
Worship just means it might actually happen with some consistency.
Take Mathilde's personal encounters:
-Back against the Singer King she was at the right place at the right time with the right kind of magic going on to hit undead with Holy Burning Shadows. Sigmar took a hand, even if not in a very big way.
-Against Stromfels, Ranald was deliberately invoked by his priests.
-By Mork against Only Gork, Mathilde just happened to be in the right place at the right time, doing an action he'd approve of, in a way he approves of.
-By Ranald when we asked him to "catch"
Every Dwarf retaking the hold in battle could with complete honesty say their gods were with them.
Its rare that it happens with so much POWER going on, but the fact of it happening is something that any high priest, including Kragg, is fairly familiar with the concept of happening.
Mathilde didn't know it could happen because the Colleges are theurgistically minimalist.
This tale is always brought up as an example of dwarf grudges being unreasonable but its not necessarily so at all?I would argue that destroying a fortress town and all its inhabitants to the last because you were shortchanged by two pennies in the payment for its construction, a fortress-town built for a noble of their greatest ally, probably helps in causing them to decline.
Because in this story what is likely to actually happen is:
-Payment was made.
-Dwarfs measured the payment, found themselves short some coin, which could be either deliberate, stolen by a subordinate or because the coins were debased/shaved.
-Dwarfs raise the matter in protest. Its Umgi, making a mistake while counting is expected.
-Protest is laughed off.
-Dwarfs attempt to claim the difference directly from the lord.
-Lord resists martially, calls the militia/army on them.
-Dwarfs fight, kill everyone still resisting, claim the difference from their corpses and count it satisfied
I'm voting for the Amber mages because the Demigryphs are a big tactical change and I'd like to know how well they do so we can assign them intelligently.A digression from the current debate, but I am a bit sad that we are ignoring our journeymanlings except Panoramia.
I like dwarves as much as the next SV user, but I would still like to spread our social interactions a bit.
I'm also voting for Johan so we can clear the air by getting to know him instead of just speculating all kinds of ill intent on his part.
And I'm voting for Maxmillian to know how he feels about the archers' performance, if they were spooked by battlemagic.