Sir_Travelsalot
Never wakes up tired.
- Location
- At Home
Given the previous worries about sockpuppeting, I can't decide whether your username and timing is hilarious or deeply unfortunate.
Given the previous worries about sockpuppeting, I can't decide whether your username and timing is hilarious or deeply unfortunate.
It's "don't count on Ranald doing what you want."Unfortunately I've gotten a bit confused by these 60+ pages of back-and-forth about what exactly Faith means. Is there a chance that Faith leads to more Divine + AV stuff if Ranald approves of it? Or is Faith just "Prudence, but you let Ranald know it's possible"?
[X] Truth
I really hope Faith doesn't win... But if it does win, I hope Ranald likes it and lets us use this anyway.
Unfortunately I've gotten a bit confused by these 60+ pages of back-and-forth about what exactly Faith means. Is there a chance that Faith leads to more Divine + AV stuff if Ranald approves of it? Or is Faith just "Prudence, but you let Ranald know it's possible"?
Close vote, huh? I think I'm going to stop following this so closely, it's giving me unpleasant flashbacks of the job vote, and that's never fun to remember.
I can asssure you [site.getmembername(22053) that i am a real person with real skinGiven the previous worries about sockpuppeting, I can't decide whether your username and timing is hilarious or deeply unfortunate.
[X] Truth
I really hope Faith doesn't win... But if it does win, I hope Ranald likes it and lets us use this anyway.
Unfortunately I've gotten a bit confused by these 60+ pages of back-and-forth about what exactly Faith means. Is there a chance that Faith leads to more Divine + AV stuff if Ranald approves of it? Or is Faith just "Prudence, but you let Ranald know it's possible"?
Choosing to disclose information that involves a friend and respecting their boundaries is not unconditional submission. I think this is a case of fixating on the terms "Faith/Devotion/Sacrifice" and conflating their meaning.
Choosing to disclose information that involves a friend and respecting their boundaries is not unconditional submission. I think this is a case of fixating on the terms "Faith/Devotion/Sacrifice" and conflating their meaning.
Choosing to disclose information that involves a friend and respecting their boundaries is not unconditional submission. I think this is a case of fixating on the terms "Faith/Devotion/Sacrifice" and conflating their meaning.
We have direct confirmation that Ranald cares more about having us close to him that our own interests, if we choose to abandon research and sacrifice that progress to him then he will take it.Faith scenarios from best to worst -
1. Ranald likes what we're doing and helps our research.
2. Ranald is ok with it, and we continue, he still has our back.
3. Ranald is ok with it, just doesn't want us fingerprinting him, everyone else is fair game. Will back us on this.
4. Ranald is ok with it, but he doesn't want to be implicated, so he won't have our back if we get caught, but he is otherwise with us.
5. A combo of 3 and 4, we still have his favor for other stuff.
6. Ranald wants us to stop this line of research.
The option of him wanting to destroy AV is non existent imo, since Boney doesn't do trap votes.
Both Research and Faith are gambles. Research just pushes the gamble on Ranald's reaction to a later date, with slightly worst odds.
I rather take the odds on Faith.
Here is what the QM has said on the subject:Unfortunately I've gotten a bit confused by these 60+ pages of back-and-forth about what exactly Faith means. Is there a chance that Faith leads to more Divine + AV stuff if Ranald approves of it? Or is Faith just "Prudence, but you let Ranald know it's possible"?
Hrm, so... the intent of the Faith choice is all about drawing Ranald's attention to this accomplishment, then?
Basically, we are communicating two things to Ranald:By sacrificing Ranaldian energy that Ranald did not create you would be revealing to Him that you are able to create and trap that energy, and by doing so inviting Him to pass judgement on it. It's not impossible that He'd give Mathilde a high five and tell her to go nuts, but it's definitely not something you should be counting on.
That's not uncomment in normal human interaction though. If you do something that steps over where you think the line is between you and someone else, apologizing and saying you'll never do it again is pretty common. If they reply with "nah, you're good; I don't mind" then they're deciding "for you" in the same way you seem to find so objectionable here.No, it is a case of allowing Ranald to define how we use the technique we developed for everyone and for all time. It is granting him power over the process far in excess of any moral imperative
That's not uncomment in normal human interaction though. If you do something that steps over where you think the line is between you and someone else, apologizing and saying you'll never do it again is pretty common. If they reply with "nah, you're good; I don't mind" then they're deciding"for you" in the same way you seem to find so objectionable here.
A better analogy would be "this would be the biologists who took Henrietta Lacks' cells for study telling her what they had done and destroying them if she requested it."Ritualistic sacrifice of an entire field of study and all the things unknown that may be found thereof are 'not uncommon in human interaction'? I'm sorry this is not anything for which there is any normal human interaction. This is Marie Curie deciding to destroy her whole theory of radioactivity because she got her uranium out of someone's land without permission by accident and they told her to do it.
The scale of the thing is staggering and I feel like people are minimizing it by making it all about the offense of the singular crystal.
Mostly just re-iterating the same points that have been made before, tbh.