grumblesTwo Nacelles is less arguing about nacelle placement when people make ship art. 4 Nacelles makes ships feel fast, like adding racing stripes.
... Isn't the great pyramid of giza a building, too?the heaviest building on Earth is the Palace of the Parliament in Bucharest, Romania, which is 700kt
Much easier to spot the Harmony-subverted puppets when they make themselves known like this.
Much easier to spot the Harmony-subverted puppets when they make themselves known like this.
Yes, it's a bit. The Harmony exclusively uses ring nacelles....I don't get it, and you know how I feel about the Harmony. Is this a bit?
I don't know, there's a lot of institutional expertise tied up with parallel nacelles- Yoyodyne et al warp theory, ship construction techniques, Starfleet engineers. I imagine a shift to Ring nacelles would be like dumping us back to T0 or lower.Hm, well, maybe after their power is broken, they'll be viable. Until then it's an automatic no unless we can be reasonably sure we've come up with the idea and designs independently(looking at you positronic computers).
I don't know, there's a lot of institutional expertise tied up with parallel nacelles- Yoyodyne et al warp theory, ship construction techniques, Starfleet engineers. I imagine a shift to Ring nacelles would be like dumping us back to T0 or lower.
That, and aesthetics- Starfleet has a certain expected look, we are required to design and commission ships that match that look, and that look does to date include long, parallel nacelles.
I think we're wandering off track here...? By two sets, do you mean quad-nacelles? Ring nacelles =/= quad nacelles, I'd think.Two sets of parallel nacelles would still, technically, be 'A set of parallel nacelles.' but it would really be stretching.
I think we're wandering off track here...? By two sets, do you mean quad-nacelles? Ring nacelles =/= quad nacelles, I'd think.
Because we've done canon quads as well (on the Stella), but quest(?) soft canon appears to be that quad nacelles complicate the warp bubble dynamics technobabble.
Harmony Choreographer:Oh, I was imagining either 'Inner set of parallel nacelles and an outer set of parallel nacelles.' or 'Two sets of parallel nacelles arranged in a circle 90 degrees apart from each other, creating a point of clashing fields near the engine trail that eufboiwsiovnoiabf' instead of a doughnut.
From @AKuz on Discord, so hopefully cool to repost as illustrative.
Yes, indeed, the Harmony Choreographer tender and older Dancer corvette design.
Commander Tiirid is conducting a rapid analysis of the emissions of HDPV Artist, her aging Choreographer-pattern emissions control systems no match for the advanced sensor arrays wielded by the pride of Starfleet.
Edit: Indeed. The ship builder has both Sprint-pattern nacelles, and Garrison-pattern nacelles available to cruisers, and while the quad-nacelle Constellation-A uses sprints, so does the Rennie/Envoy, and those are dual-nacelle ships. Sprints are also cheaper, and use less crew, as it happens, but are less efficient.(In omakes, the Constellation quad nacelle is treated as a very crew heavy option that gives greater straight-line warp speed, but lowers turning speed. In actual ship designs, no difference at a level we actually track)
That's not very nice. But so long as it doesn't devolve into "BURN THE WITCH!!" "THESE PEOPLE ARE MACHINES NOT SOPHONTS!!" and "NEURAL-CHIPS DEGRADE THE SPIRIT!!" all is well.Much easier to spot the Harmony-subverted puppets when they make themselves known like this.
That's not very nice. But so long as it doesn't devolve into "BURN THE WITCH!!" "THESE PEOPLE ARE MACHINES NOT SOPHONTS!!" and "NEURAL-CHIPS DEGRADE THE SPIRIT!!" all is well.
That's not very nice. But so long as it doesn't devolve into "BURN THE WITCH!!" "THESE PEOPLE ARE MACHINES NOT SOPHONTS!!" and "NEURAL-CHIPS DEGRADE THE SPIRIT!!" all is well.
To be honest?
I don't think that those who have fallen under deep enough control of the Singers have much personhood left. They're just tools, existing to perform their master's instructions without thought of their own.
I doubt we've seen people who have been that far corrupted, but it's a possible result.
There are certainly parallels with necromancy, causing death(-of-personality)-and-reanimation as a mockery of the previous existence. Or possession.
The Singers have caused that death and replaced the original person with a puppet who- sometimes, when permitted- gets to think they're the person their manipulated memories indicate they were beforehand.
In the more extreme cases, it's likely nothing of the original the person exists anymore, just a twisted, animated likeness.
(I really hate and on a personal, primal level fear the Singers, what they stand for and do and everything about them.
Of course, I also think people in Star Trek undeniably are disintegrated, die and get reconsituted from that data pattern every time they step into a transporter, so. And could easily and simply be cloned. Existential identity and body horror everywhere.)
Sadly, the people controlled by the Singers do have personhood. It's just that they're entirely new people that replaced the person who had a death of personality. That's one of the worst bits about the Singers, because all the people they're stringing along are actual people who, in the absence of Singers and with a great deal of psychiatric help, could very easily be productive and well adjusted members of society.I don't think that those who have fallen under deep enough control of the Singers have much personhood left. They're just tools, existing to perform their master's instructions without thought of their own.
Sadly, the people controlled by the Singers do have personhood. It's just that they're entirely new people that replaced the person who had a death of personality. That's one of the worst bits about the Singers, because all the people they're stringing along are actual people who, in the absence of Singers and with a great deal of psychiatric help, could very easily be productive members of society.