then why you and the other GMs decided to make the Singers such Blatantly Irredeemably Evil Assholes™
Good question.

When I unfortunately have to think about them, I'm firmly in the "goddam tired of the Singers" camp. I half-joke about the "Poochie Solution" on Discord.
I also really don't appreciate the calls the direct or sideeyed calls for genocide that mentioning them in-thread generates.

But- why did they have to be so irredeemable that it provokes those calls?
That was a misstep. Not helping here at all- apparently, if only partly, due to real-life issues- we're still waiting on seeing any alternatives from the Discord/Disruption mechanics. Not helping.

I don't like it, and to add another indignity- we got the fucking Federation "Nation Building" Army out of the plot line, too.
 
Last edited:
Just so everyone is aware, we have already been provided to chances to strike at the Singers as acceptable military targets. If doing so is genocide, why has it been given to us as a valid option for us to take?

Known Singer Hub on Narravonn (Gammon's moon)
  • Mission: Information Hack (Req.: Computer + Infiltration 3, Escape 2). Disruption 2; d3 new targets.
  • Mission: Destroy (Req.: Kinetic 3, Escape 3). Disruption 4.

Known Singer Hub on Narravonn (Gammon's moon)
  • Mission: Information Hack (Req.: Computer + Infiltration 3, Escape 2). Disruption 2; d3 new targets.
  • Mission: Destroy (Req.: Kinetic 3, Escape 3). Disruption 4.
 
Just so everyone is aware, we have already been provided to chances to strike at the Singers as acceptable military targets. If doing so is genocide, why has it been given to us as a valid option for us to take?
Now you're being disingenous. Killing a single Singer is no more genocide than killing a single Chinese or Arab, or whatever. If you plan to kill all Chinese or Arabs however, that is genocide.
 
Now you're being disingenous. Killing a single Singer is no more genocide than killing a single Chinese or Arab, or whatever. If you plan to kill all Chinese or Arabs however, that is genocide.

I'm not advocating to kill all of the Singers, just treating them as acceptable military targets, but I keep getting told that I am advocating for genocide when I do that. I have certainly never advocated for killing the boxed dissenters and have even used them as an example of how the Singers aren't inherently evil and why we only need to get rid of the evil ones and not wipe them all out. Through I admit that might not have been clear given that we call the evil leadership caste of the HoH 'the Singers', but we also called the uploaded members of the HoH Singers "the Singers" as well.

To clarify things, the only time I have advocating for getting rid of the Singers has been in reference to the secret government that is ruling the HoH and not just all of the uploaded HoH members. I am actually quite eager to unbox some of the boxed Singers to see just why they got boxed.

I also uncertain about where a Singer Hub holds one Singer or multiple Singers.
 
I'm not advocating to kill all of the Singers, just treating them as acceptable military targets, but I keep getting told that I am advocating for genocide when I do that. I have certainly never advocated for killing the boxed dissenters and have even used them as an example of how the Singers aren't inherently evil and why we only need to get rid of the evil ones and not wipe them all out. Through I admit that might not have been clear given that we call the evil leadership caste of the HoH 'the Singers', but we also called the uploaded members of the HoH Singers "the Singers" as well.

To clarify things, the only time I have advocating for getting rid of the Singers has been in reference to the secret government that is ruling the HoH and not just all of the uploaded HoH members. I am actually quite eager to unbox some of the boxed Singers to see just why they got boxed.

I also uncertain about where a Singer Hub holds one Singer or multiple Singers.
Wanting to kill "only" like 90% of them is still genocide....
 
I'm not advocating to kill all of the Singers, just treating them as acceptable military targets, but I keep getting told that I am advocating for genocide when I do that. I have certainly never advocated for killing the boxed dissenters and have even used them as an example of how the Singers aren't inherently evil and why we only need to get rid of the evil ones and not wipe them all out. Through I admit that might not have been clear given that we call the evil leadership caste of the HoH 'the Singers', but we also called the uploaded members of the HoH Singers "the Singers" as well.

To clarify things, the only time I have advocating for getting rid of the Singers has been in reference to the secret government that is ruling the HoH and not just all of the uploaded HoH members. I am actually quite eager to unbox some of the boxed Singers to see just why they got boxed.

I also uncertain about where a Singer Hub holds one Singer or multiple Singers.

While I doubt we will ever have this choice, if I had to choose between pressing a button that would kill the Singers or not pressing it, I would go with the former.

So yes, I feel that right now killing the Singers would be the most moral option

For some reason, I don't believe you.
 
Now you're being disingenous. Killing a single Singer is no more genocide than killing a single Chinese or Arab, or whatever. If you plan to kill all Chinese or Arabs however, that is genocide.
Killing a single Chinese or Arab with no reason included would, however, be murder. The reason we can kill individual Singers and it's not murder is because they're enemy combatants. The reason they're all (unlike in the inadequate examples you used) enemy combatants is because of the horrible things they all do as a matter of course.

The reason we could kill every Singer and it would not be genocide (unless they somehow found it within their megalomaniac little hearts to surrender when we requested it) is the same reason we can kill any given Singer and have it not be murder: because of what they do.
 
Last edited:
Wanting to kill "only" like 90% of them is still genocide....

That isn't what genocide is.
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide said:
Article II​
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such :
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.​
Genocide is where you deliberately target a nationality, ethnicity, racial or religious group with the wilful intent to destroy them. It isn't just kill a lot of them. Your post is just flat out wrong because ignores the fact that the 90% of the Singers (the uploaded transhumans) are operating as acceptable military targets in the situation as part of the Singers (the evil secret government). Why should the Singers (the evil secret government) get a free pass when we are targeting other HoH military targets in that scenario? Why it is okay to kill other members of the HoH during a hot war, but it is suddenly wrong to kill the Singers in that hot war? So long as we aren't killing the Singers (the evil secret government) for being Singers (the uploaded transhumans) and are only targeting them as acceptable military targets, it isn't genocide because we are fighting a war, whether it be hot or cold.

Furthermore, I don't to kill the Singers, I just want to save their victims. But the QMs have made the Singers unstoppable enough and unrepentantly evil enough that I don't care about if they live or die in the process of saving their victims.
At the end of the day, I don't care about the Singers or their fates. I just want to save their victims and right now, we have no way of doing that beyond maybe killing the Singers which we know is possible even if we have no quick and clean way of doing that. I would rather find an alternative way because using violence would almost certainly be done via a bloody and brutal Federation-Harmony war which would get countless innocents killed.

For some reason, I don't believe you.

That would be because you are bad faith debating and ignoring context to make a strawman.
To clarify things, the only time I have advocating for getting rid of the Singers has been in reference to the secret government that is ruling the HoH and not just all of the uploaded HoH members. I am actually quite eager to unbox some of the boxed Singers to see just why they got boxed.
In a theoretical binary choice that will never come up in the quest as per WoG, I would consider killing evil secret government that is called the Singers instead of letting them go about enslaving countless innocent people. Because I don't consider killing to be the worst thing out there and consider there to be worst things.

But hey, you can just cherry pick my posts and ignore the fact that out side of that theoretical example that will never happen as per WoG, I am for saving the victims of the HoH and doing so via finding better alternatives to using war and violence. Just claim that I am pro-genocide for wanting to treat all of the enemy combatants as acceptable military targets and to want to topple and evil mind controlling
However, I feel that looking for better alternatives is what we should be doing.
At the end of the day, I don't care about the Singers or their fates. I just want to save their victims and right now, we have no way of doing that beyond maybe killing the Singers which we know is possible even if we have no quick and clean way of doing that. I would rather find an alternative way because using violence would almost certainly be done via a bloody and brutal Federation-Harmony war which would get countless innocents killed
I would rather find an alternative way because using violence would almost certainly be done via a bloody and brutal Federation-Harmony war which would get countless innocents killed.

But anyway, this is what I want to do, what our Pacifist President has actually said in one of the updates.
"First, we have to reduce our exposure," begins Okaar. "We find out how we are being compromised and root it out, we fight where the time and place is right and put the Harmony on their heels. Second, we find a way to proof ourselves against further compromise. And finally, we push the Singers to recognise that we are equals that must be negotiated with as such, and not another species to be turned."

'Recognition like that is likely to take a war,' you think to yourself sourly.

"Yes, Admiral, it might take a war," snaps Okaar. You share a brief sympathetic glance with T'Vir; Betazoids are a security nightmare! "But when I'm trapped on the horns of a dilemma between accepting the total corruption and failure of diplomacy across a good quarter of the Federation's sky, and a war ... the Federation does not pride itself on settling for a lesser of two evils approach. We will strive and pour out the best of ourselves to find a choice we can make between good and evil, but in the interim, we will also not allow ourselves to do the maximum of harm through self-indulgence. We can declare peace after a war - but simply sitting by and letting the utility of diplomacy be tossed aside by AI that just hijack brains? No!"
The above quote is what I want to do except I don't care what the fates of the Singers (the evil secret government) are. Is that clear enough for you or are you too busy not believing me to listen to what my stance is?
 
Well, the Borg did not have this many hostages (or at least the Federation didn't know drones could be rescued). Also, we all know Q well enough to know he'd have said no.
The Borg had exponentially more hostages than anything the Horizon has ever even dreamed of.
The Federation has been aware that it was at least theoretically possible to rescue drones, or they wouldn't have tried to retrieve Locutus. And you can't tell me Starfleet Intelligence did not interview Guinan before allowing her on the Enterprise.
 
Honestly, the singers are the kind of groups in fiction that are uncomfortable to talk about, because shoot on sight against them because a sensible military practice. This is not to say the federation would dedicate itself to killing 100% of the singers, but every active singer is as much a military target as a horizon warship. In the event of war, we will be trying to kill singers in the same way we're trying to blow up horizon military ships. They are a group made up entirely of combatants guilty of horrific crimes.

if there was a secret government made up of normal unaugmented individuals who just used tech to do what the singers are doing, we would very much consider killing any amount of them to end or shorten the war justified. Because that is just a group of intensely evil and powerful people who must be stopped, ideally via imprisonment but lethal force is justified if necessary. but they are uploads, so they've made themselves into their own subspecies, that consist entirely of intensely evil and powerful people. So now that same approach takes on shades of ethnic cleansing.
 
Last edited:
If they've been locked away without any form of inputs for meaningful lengths of time, I expect they're going to need even more therapy than the freeroaming Singers.

they are probably "off" so they don't experience time. remember, boxing is seen not as a punishment, but as a way to contain singers who are "unwell". until someone can come around and rewrite them to be "well" which now that I think about it is yet another horrifying part of the whole mess.
 
Honestly, the singers are the kind of groups in fiction that are uncomfortable to talk about, because shoot on sight against them because a sensible military practice. This is not to say the federation would dedicate itself to killing 100% of the singers, but every active singer is as much a military target as a horizon warship. In the event of war, we will be trying to kill singers in the same way we're trying to blow up horizon military ships. They are a group made up entirely of combatants guilty of horrific crimes.

if there was a secret government made up of normal unaugmented individuals who just used tech to do what the singers are doing, we would very much consider killing any amount of them to end or shorten the war justified. Because that is just a group of intensely evil and powerful people who must be stopped, ideally via imprisonment but lethal force is justified if necessary. but they are uploads, so they've made themselves into their own subspecies, that consist entirely of intensely evil and powerful people. So now that same approach takes on shades of ethnic cleansing.

I still maintain they aren't a separate species any more than you as a plasma being would be. Their transformation is more akin to being a different state of matter than being a different species. There's also the point where the Archivist specifically said that the Imrael Singers are just ultra-rare forms of Imrael. Treating them more akin to Shiny Pokemon than something other than their original species.
 
If it weren't for the fact that holodecks tend to go disastrously wrong, airgapped standalone units would be a perfect way to allow for interacting with individual Singers. Of course, you'd need to crank the safeties way up, so as to avert crazy scenarios.

There's also the point where the Archivist specifically said that the Imrael Singers are just ultra-rare forms of Imrael.
The Archivist was kind of a jerk, so I'm hesitant to put much stock in his evaluations. :tongue:
 
Let us pray they never encounter an Eye of Chaos being that is willing to work with Singers to enslave everyone. Some Emyreal Tyrant knockoff perhaps.
 
The actual solution to the problem of the Singers is pretty simple and doesn't involve killing them.

SCIENCE!

We need to develop a vaccine that can immunize brains against Singer implants and then spread it far and wide. Once that has been adopted by everyone in the galactic neighborhood the Singers pose little more problem than any other authoritarian space empire.

This has been extremely obvious to me ever since we found out how they operate, but everybody always gets all weird and talks about "killing Singers" rather than the infinitely more palatable "block their mind control abilities but good".
 
The actual solution to the problem of the Singers is pretty simple and doesn't involve killing them.

SCIENCE!

We need to develop a vaccine that can immunize brains against Singer implants and then spread it far and wide. Once that has been adopted by everyone in the galactic neighborhood the Singers pose little more problem than any other authoritarian space empire.

This has been extremely obvious to me ever since we found out how they operate, but everybody always gets all weird and talks about "killing Singers" rather than the infinitely more palatable "block their mind control abilities but good".

You really think they won't adapt? The Biophage didn't because we killed it all.
 
You really think they won't adapt? The Biophage didn't because we killed it all.

This is actually false. We've always suspected some Biophage survived the battle of Kadesh, or was simply not in the system during the fight. We even had an event a few years later where we and the Romulans intercepted a small shuttle that was infected and destroyed it. That's why the vaccine was so important. Pretty sure Nash said afterwards that the development of the vaccine was significantly more important when it came to ending the crisis than the battle of Kadesh was. So yeah, using the Biophage crisis as our model of succesful crisis resolution, a science solution is exactly what we should be going for. Obviously not going to be easy, but doable.

Realistically, with the Singers ability to hide in and manipulate computer networks, the chance of us managing to find and capture every single one of them is low. And how would we even know we had captured them all if we did. Totally within reason for one to stay dormant for decades or even centuries to avoid notice. They are physically immune to aging, no reason one of them wouldn't adopt that as a backup plan if their regime collapsed. The best way to resolve the crisis is to nullify their ability to do harm.

As another point of comparison, we didn't kill all the full mentats when we ended the Arcadian War. We just changed protocols so that they were restricted to theoretical models only and weren't given unlimited access to dangerous equipment. That and restricting the process to the partial mentat stage meant that mentats were still around, but their ability to cause major damage was gone.

Edit: Couldn't find the exact quote I was looking for, but here's one from Nash's report in the final month of the crisis.

"We are still stationed in the Kadesh system, running down every sensor ghost and cleaning up pockets of Biophage. Given the number of pockets, I am, regrettably, almost positive that some of the Biophage has escaped. There is simply no longer enough hulls to properly account for them."
 
Last edited:
Right now, the Singers exist as the secret mind-controlling cyber-deities of a mighty empire, continuing to treat trillions of normal sapients as either their privately owned dollhouse to play with as they see fit, or as 'feral' to be tamed and added to the dollhouse.

My own take on this is that the Singers are in a moral position where to continue to exist as they have chosen to exist is morally worse than them not existing at all. The Singers surrendering this kind of power, abandoning the tyranny of "Actual Intelligences" over us pseudo-intelligent meat forms, is fine by me.

But if the Singers would rather die than abandon this kind of power, then the galaxy is vastly better off with them dead.

That's not because I want to exterminate them to the last uploaded AI. It's because sometimes, when you're doing evil, the price of getting to keep living is to stop doing evil. You don't get to keep abusing and enslaving millions on the grounds that stopping you would require killing you.

i'm not going to assuming that losing a hidden pillar of support and the open leaders in one fell swoop would not collapse a socity unless given strong evidence to the contrary.
It's very hard to estimate, because we have no idea whatsoever what Harmony society would look like without constant Singer adjustment and micromanagement.

I'm starting to question if the community here is mature enough to handle these themes. "Genocide the Singers" appears to be a topic of seemingly neverending obsession for much of the thread. We've had this conversation again, and again, and again, and it's becoming super tiresome. If you want to simply kill and destroy all your problems, go join Klingon Quest. Otherwise, wait for the next Discord post when we'll have a chance to spend the Disruption we've been earning from our (rather aggressive and explod-y) Special Ops missions.
I mean, the fundamental problem with the Singers is that when you get right down to it, they're some thousands of specific individuals who have (subtly) conquered and enslaved billions and were trying to enslave and conquer US. They're not an entire civilization. They're the leader caste of a civilization. And they're a civilization too open to the idea of conquering us for us to not respond to, because they're an aggressively hegemonizing force over and above the many billions they've already enslaved.

I don't want to kill them as such, I don't consider the idea an obsession. I'm just not sure how to make the problem go away without at least killing so many Singers that the remaining ones get the idea "no, you will never again be allowed to be the secret puppet master of millions of mind slaves."

If I did see a different way to make the problem go away I'd be happy to promote that idea instead. But it's been made very clear to us by the QMs that right now the Singers don't really even perceive normal sapients as people and won't be willing to negotiate with us in any meaningful sense, let alone be persuaded by us to abandon the mass enslavement that has been their main avocation for centuries.

Significant plot events or changes would have to happen, before we could face a scenario where it looks like we can end mass slavery by the Singers (and the threat of our own future enslavement by same) without killing many many Singers.

Slavery comes down to economics. If slaves are more profitable in whatever accounting calculus (money, fame, power etc) then slavery will exist.

In the real world, for the majority of the planet, wealth creation is vastly more effective in a non-slave system, so what slavery does exists is clandestine and mostly focused on personal power over others.
Except that the Singers don't control and enslave people for economic profit. They do it because they like running their own little worlds. They're basically playing Stardew Valley with real live beings. They may harbor protective and benevolent attitudes towards the real live beings they control, just as you probably wouldn't deliberately optimize your Stardew Valley game to make your characters miserable. But they're not doing it for money.

That actually makes things a lot harder, because we can't just make it unprofitable for them to keep slaves, or invent a more profitable way for them to live that doesn't involve slavery.

To convince the Singers to give up slavery, we would have to convince them to give up the only thing they love.

Again, I'm not saying we can't do that. I'm saying that the evolution of the quest will have to present us with options and opportunities that as of right now do not exist for us, for us to succeed. Looking only at the known situation and known assets of the Federation, there's no clear path to us ending the threat, and the mass slavery of billions, without killing most if not all of the Singer upload entities.

If the QMs intend to fix that, then I look forward to them moving the plot to a place where it seems plausible that the Singers can be neutralized as an abusive threat to the galaxy nonlethally.

Now you're being disingenous. Killing a single Singer is no more genocide than killing a single Chinese or Arab, or whatever. If you plan to kill all Chinese or Arabs however, that is genocide.
Is "Singer" an ethnicity like "Chinese" or "Arab?"

Or is it a rank like "colonel" or "senator?"

We've already met one other species that uploads its (superannuated) people much more avidly than the Singers- the cyber-gerontocracy (I can't find them in the wiki or easily in the thread). Is that actually TWO species, one of living people and one of uploads?

I mean, seriously, if the Romulan Senate was Being Evil (TM) and it seemed clear that stopping them was a necessity, would we have to say "killing the Romulan Senate itself would be genoicde?" Senators are promoted from among the ranks of the Romulans as a whole; they are an integral part of Romulan society rather than having a separate, autonomous society. Even if the senators were biologically immortal, or otherwise augmented to be beyond the Romulan norm, and even if they had superhuman powers that made them individually a massive threat...

I'd question whether "we have to kill all the Romulan senators" is inherently any more immoral than saying "we have to kill all the enemy sailors aboard that battleship by sinking the battleship."

The actual solution to the problem of the Singers is pretty simple and doesn't involve killing them.

SCIENCE!

We need to develop a vaccine that can immunize brains against Singer implants and then spread it far and wide. Once that has been adopted by everyone in the galactic neighborhood the Singers pose little more problem than any other authoritarian space empire.

This has been extremely obvious to me ever since we found out how they operate, but everybody always gets all weird and talks about "killing Singers" rather than the infinitely more palatable "block their mind control abilities but good".
This would fall under the above category of "major plot changes that alter the situation so that killing Singers no longer seems like an imperative."

The big problem is that the Singers won't let such an immunization by SCIENCE!!! spread into their territory willingly, and would always continue to use the resources of the Harmony to spread their influence, subvert the immunization programs of other powers, and in general keep trying to break containment.

So it would still almost certainly need to be combined with something more, something that would either persuade the Singers to abandon their love of pupating people, or force them to stop against their will.
 
So In a desperate attempt to stop this train wreck out of curiosity, is there an actual, official criteria for a Federation world to be called "Major?"

Or is it just "when it feels right?"
 
So In a desperate attempt to stop this train wreck out of curiosity, is there an actual, official criteria for a Federation world to be called "Major?"

Or is it just "when it feels right?"
I suspect there are a bunch of rules (written or unwritten) that prevent the Council from being stacked too heavily in the favor of the more established races by gimping their 'major worlds' threshold.
 
Back
Top