No. That was Riker.
No. That was Riker.
The only descriptions I've been getting of the Amarki are "vulcan ears" and "animu," so that's what I did.
Nope, that was Riker. Data's a Lieutenant Commander.
Right now all of those would be red. TOS movie era uniforms.Samhaya, as the XO, would be command red.
EDIT: and Zaamardi (sp) is the science officer IIRC so he'd be Blue
That's funny, because in addition to being second officer Data was also Operations Officer (aka Chief of Operations) and basically the de facto science officer.Oh. I'd been reading XO as "chief of operations," ie, "the guy who sits at ops," rather than first officer.
Already ahead of you.
I know, its just the era of Trek uniform that I'm most familiar with, so I've been defaulting to it.
Rather than poke fun at them, I'd much rather be incredibly happy that they aren't giving us hell at the same time as we're dealing with Cardassians.Given their showing in this quest, I'd say "Tal Shiar" should be a euphemism for slowpoke rather than ninja.
Rather than poke fun at them, I'd much rather be incredibly happy that they aren't giving us hell at the same time as we're dealing with Cardassians.
I will accept the euphamism being "Amarki'd" if it means I get thoseGiven their showing in this quest, I'd say "Tal Shiar" should be a euphemism for slowpoke rather than ninja.
I like how, in the stick figure portrayals of the Enterprise command team, Commander Zaardmani is basically on the receiving end of ALL THE PHEROMONES... except for a few molecules that drift Nash's way.
Wow. I'm not sure, but that would probably solve our cruiser shortage for pretty well, or at least put a nice fat dent into it. ... I just know that there's a downside here, I just KNOW it!
Maybe they're residual traces of Orion pheromones from some other incident?
It's lingering on Nash's clothes from a diplomatic visit earlier that day.Maybe they're residual traces of Orion pheromones from some other incident?
As you said, Nash needs no explanations.
Wow. I'm not sure, but that would probably solve our cruiser shortage for pretty well, or at least put a nice fat dent into it. ... I just know that there's a downside here, I just KNOW it!
Hm. When do you deduct crew from the sheet? I see that it's predicting a massive drop of crew at '11Q4, and the best explanation I can come up with is that that's when the Con-B's deduct their crew, but I don't normally pay enough attention to the mechanics to now that off-hand.
I deduce crew when the ship reaches the first quarter of its last year of build, because that's when crews are deducted (to give them one year training time). We may have a deficit that quarter or maybe not; the future is hard to predict. If we do have a deficit, we can either choose to mothball some ships or we could choose to put the ships on "pause" for one quarter and deduct the crew when we get a fresh academy infusion in Q1 of the next year, effectively delaying a couple of the ships by 1 quarter.
Aren't recruitment drives restricted to Explorer Corps? There's no Snakepit option to just buy more crews there.It should be fine as long as we do a recruitment drive or two before then.
Aren't recruitment drives restricted to Explorer Corps? There's no Snakepit option to just buy more crews there.
If its not though, we'll do an Academy Expansion either this snakepit or next. More expensive than a recruitment drive should be, but also permanent effects so still worth it.
If we get the Dawiar situation sorted out quickly, we might also get enough extra crew from Caitian membership by the time we need to fill the Conniebees anyway.
If more people like the "maximize cruisers" strategy, here's how it might play out.
Seven Constitution-Bs started in 2309. Seven. Plus one Excelsior. Two Excelsiors started in 2310, plus the -refit of our remaining unrefitted Centaur.