I hope that the next update won't be like.
Your task force arrived to Allupii. They decided that it is an invasion force and destroyed every ship in the task force.
Stop being snide. It is unworthy of you, and of us.
You know perfectly well that
realistically the operations of any such task force will begin with diplomatic efforts to introduce oneself, establish one's bona fides, and obtain permission to enter the host nation's territory. Such expeditions and voyages were common enough in, for example, the Age of Sail.
The key point the people you mock have been making is that realistically, there are some limits on just how big and heavily armed a 'friendly visitor' that any given host nation will be prepared to tolerate.
One more thing that just occurred to me. Part of the reasoning behind people not having an issue with Harmony dropping this large fleet is that, like the Federation, they are somewhat trusted. This is something we've all more or less taken on good faith however I'm not questioning that. After all it can be argued that Harmony regularly practices perfidy.
How? This:
The Scientist-class is a ship with C2 S7 H4 L5 P7 D7 making it about as non-combatant as deep space ships get. The Solace-class meanwhile are C6 S6 H4 L5 P6 D6 marking them as clear heavy combatants. The problem is the Solace-class looks more or less identical to the Scientist-class on sensors until they open fire.
Article 37, Section 1 (e) of the Geneva Convention clearly lists "The feigning of civilian, non-combatant status;" as an act of perfidy. Now you could argue that since even the Scientist-class is armed that it's technically not a non-combatant and so it's not actually perfidy or even that Harmony never agreed to the Space Geneva Convention. However I suspect most nations would be quite wary of a nation that disguises clear cut warships as simple scientific/diplomatic vessels. It is the sort of thing that says "I'm shady and shouldn't be trusted". That is the reason the Council forbids Starfleet from using cloaking devices after all; because they prevent/limit trust as they mean anyone dealing with you will always have that little niggling bit of doubt about your intentions.
Bear in mind that the
Solaces have pretty much exactly the same statline as our un-refitted
Excelsiors did. Our argument for why it was okay to send
Excelsiors from the Explorer Corps (or for that matter the regular fleet) to visit foreign powers has never hinged on "
Excelsiors are lightly armed, harmless, noncombatant vessels."
Furthermore, many powers have weakly armed scouts; they are defined as combatants. It is not perfidy to leave outsiders uncertain as to whether any one of your ships is a weakly armed scout or a heavily armed frontline combatant. The Geneva Convention prohibition exists because the Geneva Convention draws a hard, bright line between 'civilian' and 'combatant' ships during wartime...
and the Scientist-class is on the 'combatant' side of that line.
Most nations will be naturally wary around a
Scientist-class because it might turn out to have the same weapons outfit as, say, a 2310-era
Excelsior. But then, they would be no more or less wary around a 2310-era
Excelsior, and we used those regularly for all kinds of things.
I don't think this is a problem.
Where are the Allupi located again and why haven't we befriended them yet. Maybe we should use the fifth diplo push on them. and the other 4 on the OSA, Licori, Bolians, and the Felis.
The Allupii are literally on the opposite side of Cardassian space from us, and our only contact with them has been from a single five-year mission (I think Rurliss's?) that flew around the backside of Cardassian space. We haven't befriended them because even reaching and communicating with them is a huge project very vulnerable to Cardassian interference. The reason not to spend a fifth diplomatic push on them is because it's almost always better to spend diplomatic pushes on affiliates, because doing so achieves four times as much relationship gain and/or tag clearance.
I think I am the only one who's said anything close to that. And I have only said that this is a legitimate act of war. That's different from "we should immediately declare war". The Japanese attack on the USS Paney was a legitimate act of war - the US chose to not go to war over it. I could go on and pick out a few more modern examples, but I don't want to confuse my point with real world politics that we could argue over.
Which is one of the reasons why I asked the QMs if there were any tripwires to avoid war. Is there a hotline between Paris and the HoH capital? Is there something like a weekly meeting of diplomats to talk this sort of thing out? Is there something like the UN to facilitate negotiation? Note that what the HoH have done is much like the opening moves some powers made before WW1 - those moves were taken as acts of war and all of Europe had a war defending themselves from the aggression of their neighbours. This is also much like the Cuban missile crisis, where the two powers had regular powows, a UN that could facilitate talks, spy satellites to give them a good idea of what the enemy was really doing so they didn't have to only react to "what is the absolute worst case contingency we need to deal with". The US and the Soviets had lots of tripwires that slowed the slide towards war and ultimately a deal was worked out that was reasonably good for both sides (I'd say the Soviets "won", but the US didn't do badly at all from the settlement).
Given the sort of power the HoH is, when I asked my original question, I expected an answer like "oh, yes, the FDS are already talking to the HoH diplomats, further options to vote on will become available as the FDS and the Council swing into action". In other words, that there were tripwires behind the scenes and that they were working. Instead I get "what act of war? are you crazy, clearly you can see the game mechanics being used don't fit with the aggressive nightmare you're painting. and stop moaning, you wouldn't moan if you did this!" Which was a little insulting and a bit incredible.
This, very much this.
It's disorienting (and, again, kind of insulting) to be told "wait, what? Why are you talking about how these large fleets of ships have military potential? Are you crazy? Stop behaving as if people should react realistically to the presence of very large and overwhelming armed task forces on their borders!"
And also kind of insulting when all this is interpreted as an attempt to seize advantage for the Federation, as opposed to a sudden spike of confusion about "hey, what are the rules anyway, is this realistic" caused by a sudden spike in the scale of fleets being deployed in this way.
Yeah, it is totally fair to have the Harmony really challenge our expansion on their doorstep and I've been waiting for this for a while (there had been hints that we hadn't been seeing the HoH seriously compete with us before).
I agree. I have
no problem with the Harmony exerting great leverage and skill to win over some of these powers, I have no problem with them succeeding in winning over some or even all of them.
I remember disagreeing with this and stand by that still. Don't remember the particulars though.
Well, all I was getting at is that a dozen ships is a dozen ships. What the ships are doing
presently is kind of beside the point; the ships are generally multirole vessels that can do many things. If the Laio see 10-15 Federation ships flitting around their space, they're reasonably going to interpret that as a sign that the Federation seriously intends to maintain a presence in the region. Given that we are the Laio's friends, that means they will probably expect us to be willing to help them deal with their problems.
Now
in fact we got no opportunity to do this because there wasn't a [We're Getting Pirated] tag for the Laio or anything. But again, this is about the separation between OOC mechanical knowledge and IC character knowledge.
I would disagree on the doom stack part. They are in several different stacks over a significant area of space. They can not, in fact, unite in a single fleet of doom, because that would be a giant red flashing sign of "Imminent attack!" to everyone around.
The thing is, a dispersed force like theirs can concentrate fairly quickly. Their ships are not slow, and at sprint speeds they could muster a large fraction of their total 40+ capital ships in one place within a week or so.
The point here is not "this is a Harmony invasion fleet," it's "this would make it
much easier for the Harmony to concentrate overpowering military force somewhere, and people will react accordingly." Like, again, if the Harmony has covertly arranged for revolts to break out on Licori worlds on a pre-scheduled date, they now have enough muscle to arrange for these revolts to succeed, simply by directing their ships to be in the right general region of space at the right time.
Remember that staredown over Khalt where rebels overthrew House Manan and our frigate
Aurora encountered the Licori battleship with Halkh aboard? In that situation, Halkh had the more powerful ship and was in a good position to assert control of the situation in the name of the Licori government. By contrast, if we'd had an
Ambassador present, we'd have a power that Halkh could not easily defeat with what he had on hand, and
HE would have to defer to
US. He would not be able to assert control of the situation without our permission. If the Federation captain on the spot had decided to protect the rebels, and was willing to fight to protect the rebels, he would have no way to do anything about it- except to fight, lose, fail, and probably die.
A Harmony carrier battlegroup that just happens to arrive within a day or two of a major uprising on a Licori world "to help restore order" by setting up a "compromise government" that looks however the Harmony wants it to... Puts the Licori in that position. It doesn't even have to be their whole fleet; even one heavy tender plus half a dozen or so parasite corvettes plus a few of their well-armed
Solaces is already a force so strong the Licori can't counter it without a full mobilization that would chew up their military severely. Especially given that much of their frigate and cruiser force is actually owned by the Houses, not by the Emperor himself.
I mean, even a single C40 stack
in the right place at the right time, with the credible ability to threaten war with the Harmony if the stack is attacked, can be very disruptive. It doesn't take the full C250+ 'doomstack' to be a threat, especially when combined with the Harmony's gift for soft power, infiltration, and subversion.
[This is not so much me disagreeing with you, just me expanding on what you say]
Trust only goes so far. That fleet is the equivalent of someone asking to press their knife to your neck in a place without any laws. They might say that they have only good intentions, that might even be true, but... would you let them? When their stated reason to do so is... to talk?
It is one thing to expose yourself so much for reasons such as having a snake or a deadly bug on your neck to something, but to talk? When you can talk without this just fine, just... slower?
Nations survive by not opening themselves to backstabs. It is far harder to build trust between polities then it is between people, and that can already be damn hard.
Yes. This.