Starfleet Design Bureau

If we are sending manned ships to do cursory examinations of every single brown dwarf star than the federation is doomed from the get go. Our ship should be for when something actually interesting that an unmanned probe isn't equipped to investigate pops up
 
I honestly need to read up on just what an i means here, 'cuz that does feel lile a relative pittance compared to a single torpedo tube
I think there's some mechanics to the Industry cost having to do with the tritanium hull, but I don't know exactly how Sayle calculates that for the different options.
 
If we are sending manned ships to do cursory examinations of every single brown dwarf star than the federation is doomed from the get go. Our ship should be for when something actually interesting that an unmanned probe isn't equipped to investigate pops up
There's still nearly 500 magnitude 6 stars within 100 light years of Earth and given all the myriad excuses Star Trek can likely whip up for why things might not be observable from Earth I expect the number of 'interesting' stars to be significantly higher. Like the Delphic Expanse... which is apparently 2,000 lightyears across and illustrates my point on sheer scale even if it doesn't seem to be canon here
 
[X] Sphere (Industry: 2)

This is not supposed to be a combat vessel except as a last resort, and Starfleet wants to cover a lot of ground. Trading some combat ability for lower costs seems like the best design philosophy to take.
 
[X] Sphere (Industry: 2)

This is not supposed to be a combat vessel except as a last resort, and Starfleet wants to cover a lot of ground. Trading some combat ability for lower costs seems like the best design philosophy to take.
I'm not worried about this being used as a combat ship, going out and finding trouble. I am worried that as a survey ship, trouble will find it.
The final option is a sphere, which will provide you with around the same internal space as a half saucer but at a lower cost, though the awkward geometry means you will only have an option of forward weapon arrays in the primary hull and the secondary hull will have to be immediately behind it.
Locking weapons into facing one direction is genuinely a terrible decision, and it still only has as much space as a Half-Saucer hull. That is two disadvantages on one ship, for the ability to save only one industry. I understand wanting to keep the ship cheap, we have to worry about industry cost again now that the war is over, but trying to say it needs little to no defense at all is naïve.
 
Or
Locking weapons into facing one direction is genuinely a terrible decision, and it still only has as much space as a Half-Saucer hull. That is two disadvantages on one ship, for the ability to save only one industry. I understand wanting to keep the ship cheap, we have to worry about industry cost again now that the war is over, but trying to say it needs little to no defense at all is naïve.
ORB ORB ORB!

You just can't handle an ORB like a real ORB Federation Ship Designer!

Joke aside, you make a good point. But we geht with the allpowerfull ORB the same room as a half-saucer. And the allpowerfull ORB is cheaper and will most likely be used only in our borders. Here cheapness is better
 
ORB is cheaper and will most likely be used only in our borders. Here cheapness is better
Cost effectiveness is good. If it can do science twice as fast because it has 2 labs or can act as a hospital ship in an emergency, all for the cost of a 2 industry or about 7%* increase in the cost of the ship, then that seems like a good improvement in cost effectiveness for a Full Saucer.

*The 7% increase assumes the following:
Hull and propulsion costs increase from 12 to ~16 from Selachii
Weapons fit out drops from 16 to 12 because we don't need multiple torpedo launchers
2/(16 + 12) = ~7%

These are very conservative estimates of how much the cost of the civilian parts will increase and how much we will arm it so it will very likely be an even smaller marginal cost.
 
Last edited:
Or
ORB ORB ORB!

You just can't handle an ORB like a real ORB Federation Ship Designer!

Joke aside, you make a good point. But we geht with the allpowerfull ORB the same room as a half-saucer. And the allpowerfull ORB is cheaper and will most likely be used only in our borders. Here cheapness is better
That's because the orb sucks!

NOTHING LIKE THE GLORIOUS CUBE! PUT ONE OF THOSE BADBOYS INFRONT OF ME AND I DIE OF HAPPINESS!

(This post was sponsored by the Borg Collective)
 
Last edited:
I may be discontented by the full saucer, but even I must protest this attachment to such... tumourous rotundity.

:p
 
Last edited:
[X] Full Saucer (Industry: 4)

As our first science ship, I want to see how high we can push science by fitting ALL the bells and whistles inside.
 
I'm not worried about this being used as a combat ship, going out and finding trouble. I am worried that as a survey ship, trouble will find it.

Locking weapons into facing one direction is genuinely a terrible decision, and it still only has as much space as a Half-Saucer hull. That is two disadvantages on one ship, for the ability to save only one industry. I understand wanting to keep the ship cheap, we have to worry about industry cost again now that the war is over, but trying to say it needs little to no defense at all is naïve.
I agree that trouble's going to find them at least once, but when trouble does happen I don't think the ship's weapons configuration is going to be the deciding factor.
 
[X] Sphere (Industry: 2)

BALLS

This is supposed to be a cheap as chips space kayak. No need to fit tons of stuff. If you need more science, just send two.

That and we gotta keep costs way down. Oberths die like flies, and that means these need to be even easier to crank out on those.
 
Last edited:
Oberths die like flies, and that means these need to be even easier to crank out on those.
I think our most glorious ORB should be named Oppenheimer class! After a great man from Earth who also developed a kind of ORB.

See Timmy, that is what happens if you look to deep and to long into the Orb design. Sometimes the Orb starres back. And don't get strange like that fellow that sits with accounting all day and talks about Cubes!
 
Not trusting the other voters enough to not just start progressively making it a total warship is where most of the lets go full in on science stuff people are coming from I think, at least that's my stance; I want a science ship in my star trek.
I concur this is a dedicated Surveyor, it does not need much weaponry or other stuff.
 
I don't see a world where 'we're going to avoid costs with the full saucers by avoiding all the photon torpedoes and the minimum of phasers by investing all that space instead into cutting edge sensors and super computers' creates a cheap, mass producible ship. Realistically, science should not be a cheap stat to triple down on- and given that as others have tried to hammer home so oft- we've never made a ship purely to maximize science, I'm not going to assume its cheap in this system.

The issue has always been opportunity cost, not... cost, cost.
 
I think our most glorious ORB should be named Oppenheimer class! After a great man from Earth who also developed a kind of ORB.

See Timmy, that is what happens if you look to deep and to long into the Orb design. Sometimes the Orb starres back. And don't get strange like that fellow that sits with accounting all day and talks about Cubes!

It would contrast nicely with how most of our warships are named after harmless things. Our science ship is named after a man who created mankinds first WMD.
 
[x] Full Saucer (Industry: 4)

Am I going to regret this? Probably. Am I worried about the idea of a giant floating ball exploding so much as a pirate looks at it funny? Also yes.
 
Honest question on the weapons layouts for our ships, why can we not mount weapons to the rim's of saucer sections? Or the furthest port and starboard points on a spherical primary hull to let a single weapon cover both forward and aft firing arcs?

Like I get mounting directly on the bottom of the primary hull is a problem because of the navigational deflector, and the top is usually reserved for the primary bridge. But why no port and starboard cannons?

Only thing I can think of for saucers is keeping the power transfer lines shorter by keeping the guns closer to center mass and the warp core, but that logic wouldn't apply for ORB.
 
It would contrast nicely with how most of our warships are named after harmless things. Our science ship is named after a man who created mankinds first WMD.
Klingon: Carefull, it is a Battlecruiser of the Oppenheimer class! They once destroyed a whole squadron by exploding! Retreat! I don't fall for that trap twice!

orb ... Orb ... ORB!
 
Back
Top