- Location
- Goose Land
....I have some catching up to do, though I'm not sure if Bjarneson is present to participate in proceedings.
@I.F. Ister
So I've asked everyone in 'Clan Farfaxung (White Horse)' if I could join-- and they all said yes/agreed, so could my character 'Amerion Wardson' be moved over to the clan and the 'Family: TBD' section changed to being, like, 'distant cousin' or something like that?
Fair point! In that case, could I un-add Sleep and just upgrade Music? Or is it too late for that?Added Sleep. No idea is Lullaby is viable. My guess would be no, because what could it do that Sleep couldn't?
Fair point! In that case, could I un-add Sleep and just upgrade Music? Or is it too late for that?
[x] [Law Proposal] Challengers may not pick a proxy to fight in their stead.
That only states the challenger has to fight not the person being challenged.[x] [Law Proposal] Challengers may not pick a proxy to fight in their stead.
That only states the challenger has to fight not the person being challenged.
Norseman: That last part is actually relatively normal by our standards?
For the record, that is hyperbole. Karta's heart did not explode when he was killed.Norseman: That last part is actually relatively normal by our standards?
Sigmund seconds this law. Challengers should fight their own challenges, but the challenged may have proxy lest the strong take advantage of it to prey upon the weak.[x] [Law Proposal] Challengers may not pick a proxy to fight in their stead.
Back up your challenges with your own steel, not kins, not clan's.
To make sure I have this right. For a law to pass, someone needs nine other citizens to support his platform?If you have a law to add to the Lawspeaker's memory, that functions similarly to the above, just without the vetoing and counter-vetoing. Nine judges decide if the law is good and fair before adding it to the books.
Sigmund points out that in those cases, the kin not only have the right to challenge over the insult to their family, but the obligation to do so.[Law Proposal] Katla opposes the idea that challengers cannot choose a proxy, as it prevents those who cannot fight from seeking justice, and suggests that it leaves those who cannot fight vulnerable to abuse. She suggests that any spouse, parent, or child ought be able to act as a proxy, and if none of these survive, any neighbor might be chosen.
Yes.
No. That is only if the law proposal is contested.To make sure I have this right. For a law to pass, someone needs nine other citizens to support his platform?
Yeah, that will work[Law Proposal] Katla opposes the idea that challengers cannot choose a proxy, as it prevents those who cannot fight from seeking justice, and suggests that it leaves those who cannot fight vulnerable to abuse. She suggests that any spouse, parent, or child ought be able to act as a proxy, and if none of these survive, any neighbor might be chosen.
Is this the right idea?
If you propose a law, and somebody counters it, then it needs 9 judges, otherwise noTo make sure I have this right. For a law to pass, someone needs nine other citizens to support his platform?
Sigmund points out that in those cases, the kin not only have the right to challenge over the insult to their family, but the obligation to do so.
Sigmund points out that in those cases, the kin not only have the right to challenge over the insult to their family, but the obligation to do so.
Yes.
No. That is only if the law proposal is contested.
So anyone can propose anything and if no one catches it in time, it can pass with only one vote?If you propose a law, and somebody counters it, then it needs 9 judges, otherwise no
Correct. However, it can still be challenged at the next thing and anyone who tries something sneaky like that at the last minute would likely earn enemies.So anyone can propose anything and if no one catches it in time, it can pass with only one vote?