- Pronouns
- He/Him
Revenge against the troll-men. That'll help keep the Bloodthirst meter under control.What does this even mean? There's raiding other Norse, but iirc you were against that. Who else would there be?
Revenge against the troll-men. That'll help keep the Bloodthirst meter under control.What does this even mean? There's raiding other Norse, but iirc you were against that. Who else would there be?
Revenge against the troll-men. That'll help keep the Bloodthirst meter under control.
This is still pretty morally dubious. Like, unless their men and servants are also involved in a noble's shittiness, raiding a corrupt noble is still gonna make people's lives pretty bad. I'm not against it, but I'm just pointing that out.
Killing an actually awful noble (the kind that actually abuses their people regularly) is still gonna be a net improvement in people's lives in all likelihood. Like, we're not doing it out of altruism and a bit of collateral damage is likely, but it's a lot less shitty in general than raiding some random person.
I'm not actually super invested in ever going raiding again (I'd honestly prefer not to), but if people want to it's an option so I thought I'd mention it as a possibility.
If this place works like medieval Christendom, the expectation for a noble is that you are a knight, or something closely approximating one. Being a noble isn't an independent career track from being a warrior in the vassalage/manorial system.Fair enough.
By the way, Christian nobles in this would actually have power, right? Feudal cultivation and all that. They probably wouldn't be a Knight - more akin to a Priest, if anything - but it's kinda shitty that they get power just by virtue of their birth.
Fair enough.
By the way, Christian nobles in this would actually have power, right? Feudal cultivation and all that. They probably wouldn't be a Knight - more akin to a Priest, if anything - but it's kinda shitty that they get power just by virtue of their birth.
As for raids...
Eh... it's not that I really want to go on a raid anytime soon, but I think never going on another one ever again is somewhat disappointing. Not to mention they do give really good orthstirr... We get 111 from our Lotharingia raid.
If this place works like medieval Christendom, the expectation for a noble is that you are a knight, or something closely approximating one. Being a noble isn't an independent career track from being a warrior in the vassalage/manorial system.
(Vassalage is the part of 'feudalism' that governs how nobles relate to one another, manorialism is the economic system associated with it that governs how peasants relate to nobles outside the walled towns that often have their own status)
Was there wog on this at some point?We know there are actually four 'branches' of Feudal Cultivation, Chivalric (Knights and Squires), Clerical (Priests and presumably Nuns), Nobiliate (Nobles), and Errants (which are cultivators that don't fit in the other categories).
AN: Hunting Parties, by the way, contain Errants, which are Christian Cultivators that don't fall into the Clerical, Chivalric, or Nobiliary categories.
We know there are actually four 'branches' of Feudal Cultivation, Chivalric (Knights and Squires), Clerical (Priests and presumably Nuns), Nobiliate (Nobles), and Errants (which are cultivators that don't fit in the other categories). We know very little about the Nobiliate or Errant branches in terms of capabilities...though, like the Clerical branch, they're almost certainly less combat focused than a Knight of equivalent level.
Eh. We gained +45 from the raid on the Bandits, which took a lot less of our time and effort...hunting local threats is still solid Orthstirr gain.
Personally if we had an opportunity I would vote for going on another raid. After our trading mission of course. But just discarding that aspect of Norse society entirely feels wrong to me.
I mean, yeah, but they'd still have enough power to put any non-cultivator to shame. Like, it probably does help that sin is an actual thing that can affect your cultivation in this world, but I imagine some nobles out there are probably assholes, especially when they rule over a population that they can kill with ease.
I mean, I guess? Hunting bandits doesn't have much of the same allure to me, probably in part due to the lower orthstirr gain. Not to mention that bandits-wise, I imagine it'd be a lot less consistent, since these guys are actual raiders. I imagine most bandits are more akin to the first guy we fought way back, rather than these guys.
Can't speak for monster hunting, or draugr clean-up, since we never did those, but I imagine they'd give decent orthstirr.
Not that it matters. I'm pretty sure I'm in the minority here... and I'm not so hung up about raids that I want to try and convince everyone we should do another.
This is the era of indulgences, so you can probably buy your way out of Sin to at least some degree. Based on Gabriel, Sin also seems to be at least partially guilt-based rather than objective, so if you get a guy who doesn't feel guilty about what they do...
We did fight that priest who was literally mind controlling people into fighting suicidally.I mean, yeah, but they'd still have enough power to put any non-cultivator to shame. Like, it probably does help that sin is an actual thing that can affect your cultivation in this world, but I imagine some nobles out there are probably assholes, especially when they rule over a population that they can kill with ease.
The Saxon war and associated massacres, sacrilege et al would be pretty much impossible to do unless Sin is fully subjective or non-Christians have no ethical value under Sin valuation. Especially the part afterwards where they get Sainted/Beautified, which is honestly especially damning.This is the era of indulgences, so you can probably buy your way out of Sin to at least some degree. Based on Gabriel, Sin also seems to be at least partially guilt-based rather than objective, so if you get a guy who doesn't feel guilty about what they do...
Oh right, I forgot that paying monasteries and poor people to pray for you was a thing. Damn, that definitely gives them even more leeway to be a shitty person. I wonder if Knights/Clerics keep them in check, or something.
The Saxon war and associated massacres, sacrilege et al would be pretty much impossible to do unless Sin is fully subjective or non-Christians have no ethical value under Sin valuation. Especially the part afterwards where they get Sainted/Beautified, which is honestly especially damning.
Ditto the Cathar genocide.
Honestly I think the term Fervor and Zeal says it all. They relate to intense passion and intense belief. In other words, Sin is probably doubt-based. If you truly and earnestly believe that burning down an entire city full of people is a good thing? No Sin for you, even if it's an atrocity. If you think you were in the wrong for hitting a woman? Sin, because you're ashamed you did it. Doubt because you couldn't fight off an endless horde of Troll-Men? Sin, because you're experiencing self-doubt over yourself.
My edit-fu was not fast enough to correct myself >.>Though, on a pedantic note, the Cathar genocide has yet to occur in this universe.
Or Sin is based on the interpretation your local cultivation culture has on the bible.Honestly I think the term Fervor and Zeal says it all. They relate to intense passion and intense belief in a cause. In other words, Sin is probably doubt-based. If you truly and earnestly believe that burning down an entire city full of people is a good thing? No Sin for you, even if it's an atrocity. If you think you were in the wrong for hitting a woman? Sin, because you're ashamed you did it. Doubt because you couldn't fight off an endless horde of Troll-Men? Sin, because you're experiencing self-doubt over yourself.
Or Sin is based on the interpretation your local cultivation culture has on the bible.
The city you butchered wasn't Christian? Congratulations on fighting those devilspawn! Deus Vult!
The city you butchered was Christian (and recognized by your local cultivation culture as such)? Vile murderer! Sin!
You butchered a city and your local interpretation doesn't believe in killing people for not following ( the correct interpretation of) the bible? Vile murderer! Sin!
It might be that his knight hood involved oaths that he believes he failed to live up to and that Jerasmus helped him come to terms with.It has to be partly personal and subjective because Gabriel was suffering from it for not doing better against the Troll-Men, something neither Christian doctrine nor the local people would expect of him. That was just straight up completely unjustified guilt, and yet it was seemingly enough to get him some Sin until Jerasmus had a talk with him.
It might be that his knight hood involved oaths that he believes he failed to live up to and that Jerasmus helped him come to terms with.
(Or penance stuff)
Oh gods... please, tell me they were NOT fermenting one of these threaded man in one of the barrels....Yeah.
Tryggr cracked open the booze, which bit him in the ass hard when the fighting started. So Trausti had to carry, which isn't a good mix when you also have to manage an inexperienced combatant who is extremely eager to prove that he is capable too.
Not so much fast on its feet, Halla could easily outrun it even without the shapeshifting, but its attack speed is no joke.
....with Abjorn's calming trick and Gabriel's miracles, i could easily see them just... putting the threaded man to sleep.
Ah, Stigr's luck pretty much guarantees that, yeah.
hm... lets see....The mental image I have of Siggy is something like this;
Hawaiian t-shirt
Aviators (rose gold)
Wide-brim bucket hat
Round face, casual soft smile. Light-hearted twinkle in his eye.
Now, obviously most of those are not possible in-setting, but it gets the vibe across.
i mean, IF explicitly called out Eyvor as more likely to cause troubles...Honestly, his older brother is probably just as bad as his sister. Maybe worse.
i mean, Halla saw no way to kill Steinarr with, after she got frenzy, and for all that he is badas, we have WoG he isn't Steelfather level.... so maybe not that bad?So probably Steelfather-level. Since that's where Blackhand and Hasvir were probably around.
The 9th son of the 9th son of the 9th generation in a row!9 is also magical to the Norse, so the 9th kid might get something Special simply by dint of being the 9th.
that was for the shapecrafting ones, and even then, not all of them.Wasn't it said that Horra's schematics would've been found in the house...?
Well, guess we're not getting those anytime soon. Or ever.
i am kinda curious though, if horse is just the "classic" option for knights or not. Because if it isn't....I wonder if we can get Gabriel a horse. Knights are intended to fight with horses, after all. I'm not sure whether they'd need to be raised in Christian lands to be able to cultivate, though. I have no idea how we'd actually get a horse, too, lmao.
That will be a fun deal for sure. Remember, horsebreeding is a fucking expensive thing even today. it was much MUCH worse in the middle ages....Buying a horse is probably pretty doable, if expensive. Buying a spirit beast/cultivator horse is, uh, probably not so much.
His personal beliefs... or his oaths.Sure...but the key part there is 'believes'. His personal beliefs need to be relevant, not just those of Christians in general, or he wouldn't have had the problem.
i mean, IF explicitly called out Eyvor as more likely to cause troubles...
His personal beliefs... or his oaths.
To push things a little harder towards xianxia tropes, suppose Gabriel is imagined as, say, a Qi Condensation cultivator following the Dao of Knighthood. On some level it may not matter if he even objectively believes that he should have been invincible in defense of the innocent, because to really follow the Dao of the Knight is to be exactly that. Gabriel was unable to act in accordance with the path he's sworn to follow, in this interpretation, and that's Sin even if it wouldn't be Sin for a peasant or a clergyman in the same situation.
When was this? If anything, I'd assumed Asgeirr would be worse, because he has Low Self Control, Wrathful and Bloodlust as opposed to Eyvor's Bloodlust+ and Wrathful.