Aren't there 27 descendants named after him?Blackhand doesn't seem to have been handsome per se, more charismatic. I suspect he was also a bit more selective than this guy. Not to say he didn't sleep around, but he didn't try it with every woman he met...this guy seems to have.
You might see more or less intact forms of it in monasteries.The Christian Cultivation of Jesus's time in this universe was probably much more like that one described.
Feudal Cultivation is arguably more an offshoot of Roman Cultivation, when it split into Byzantium and the West Roman Empire.
I'm not sure if Christian Cultivation ever existed honestly.. it's a religion, not a culture. But if it did exist, it's probably mostly dead in spirit by now.
do we know where he went actually? if he went back to Wessex, perhaps we can meet him and get some advice.You might see more or less intact forms of it in monasteries.
Gerasmus doesn't seem to need a congregation, and he certainly doesn't need noble titled lands, to sustain his cultivation.
Perhaps ;P
Halle the Hairless is the common denominator
It seems unlikely that Gerasmus went to Wessex in particular. The last time we talked to him, it sounded like he was basically taking advantage of his extreme lifespan and (apparent) strong sense of his own personal safety to sort of wander around, walking the Earth, maybe converting a few people if he could or just learning about what was going on.do we know where he went actually? if he went back to Wessex, perhaps we can meet him and get some advice.
if not, its good to know. at the very least he is useful.
Honestly we probably should have seen this coming.
Halle the Hairless (A man... at least, you think they're a man. Has an unusually feminine face and overall slender appearance.)
The "Troublemaler" vs "cause of Trouble" distinction and "cause of trouble -> Common denominator: Halle" sounds like most trouble would be because of discrimination against Halle.Honestly we probably should have seen this coming.
So do we remove Halle the Hairless?
The "Troublemaler" vs "cause of Trouble" distinction and "cause of trouble -> Common denominator: Halle" sounds like most trouble would be because of discrimination against Halle.
And in that case i would prefer to tell the troublemakers to go and fuck themselves.
Halla: Stop that or you are walking home.Right there with you, if somebody start harrassing or bullying another member of the crew, we should send them first at the frontline during the next battle.
I suspect it would be a lot of the troublemakers in this case. Large portions of the crew troublemakers. We would not be able to just tell them to fuck off.The "Troublemaler" vs "cause of Trouble" distinction and "cause of trouble -> Common denominator: Halle" sounds like most trouble would be because of discrimination against Halle.
And in that case i would prefer to tell the troublemakers to go and fuck themselves.
Going to the frontline is kind of natural for the Norse so that would not be a punishment.Right there with you, if somebody start harrassing or bullying another member of the crew, we should send them first at the frontline during the next battle.
Going to the frontline is kind of natural for the Norse so that would not be a punishment.
Or there are 2 people that would cause trouble with Halle while everyone else only causes trouble with one partner.I suspect it would be a lot of the troublemakers in this case. Large portions of the crew troublemakers. We would not be able to just tell them to fuck off.
Like personally I'd rather just not deal with the drama in the background. Halle's a Lower-Middle combatant.
Cool cool thank you
On a practical level, drama on the high seas when we are getting lost and shit is a fast way to terrible outcomes for everyone on board. So I just don't want to deal with it, especially when the character in question is only known to us in a single line and isn't powerful enough to warrant just eating the issue on the chin.Or there are 2 people that would cause trouble with Halle while everyone else only causes trouble with one partner.
Yeah, but giving in on that feels Odreng (even if it isntmechanically)
that would be giving in to bullying and assholes. I am against that. that just lets the people wanting to harm him win. keeping him away at the first placeOn a practical level, drama on the high seas when we are getting lost and shit is a fast way to terrible outcomes for everyone on board. So I just don't want to deal with it, especially when the character in question is only known to us in a single line and isn't powerful enough to warrant just eating the issue on the chin.
there are more of them, but we will also have Eric, who is upper middle, and ourselves and Nokvir firmly on our side(Eric is our brother, and Nokvir his close friend). given how frightening fire Hugareida is on a ship, and that Halla is on the least trouble if fighting erupts(wind Hugareida +clearwater and campfire, and Fylgja capable of being ridden. she would survive a sinking ship). I don't expect any disobedienceI suspect it would be a lot of the troublemakers in this case. Large portions of the crew troublemakers. We would not be able to just tell them to fuck off.
Like personally I'd rather just not deal with the drama in the background. Halle's a Lower-Middle combatant.
Fuck that. If anyone shittalks Halle for being beardless, they're shittalking Halla too. We will punish them accordingly.Cool cool thank you
@DeadmanwalkingXI would you mind removing Halle from the list so we can get ahead of any trouble
I think it is, bluntly, not a good idea to assemble a crew that won't work well together. Like, whoever assembled the Felag that included Sten, Sterki and Horra fucked up majorly and had a failed raid. We're responsible for the success of this mission, and the well-being of the people on-board. It sounds extremely exhausting already just thinking of entire updates full of dealing with this instead of anything else, and terrifying thinking that this kind of drama might metaphorically or literally sink the ship because we didn't have time to mediate another grudge or some shit.that would be giving in to bullying and assholes. I am against that. that just lets the people wanting to harm him win. keeping him away at the first place
giving in to that sort of pressure might be an easy decision, but its not the sort of decision I want to see Halla make as a leader. we might lead more then just a trade mission later, and I don't want her to be this kind of leader. it makes her more like the Jarl of Jurgdby.
there are more of them, but we will also have Eric, who is upper middle, and ourselves and Nokvir firmly on our side(Eric is our brother, and Nokvir his close friend). given how frightening fire Hugareida is on a ship, and that Halla is on the least trouble if fighting erupts(wind Hugareida +clearwater and campfire, and Fylgja capable of being ridden. she would survive a sinking ship). I don't expect any disobedience
I don't think it's the beardless thing. Barki's right here, just as an example. It's probably something like actually an outlaw or somesuch.Fuck that. If anyone shittalks Halle for being beardless, they're shittalking Halla too. We will punish them accordingly.
because its their fault! if we are evicting someone because others don't like them coming, rather than because they themselves don't fit? then we fall prey to the worst of easy decisions we can make when leading the mission. we have no indication they are outlaws, just feminine. so all we are evicting them for is that they don't fit other's image of a norse warriors(same others who might have taken issue with us before). thats deserting all our principles because people won't like them. I'd rather not do that.I think it is, bluntly, not a good idea to assemble a crew that won't work well together. Like, whoever assembled the Felag that included Sten, Sterki and Horra fucked up majorly and had a failed raid. We're responsible for the success of this mission, and the well-being of the people on-board. It sounds extremely exhausting already just thinking of entire updates full of dealing with this instead of anything else, and terrifying thinking that this kind of drama might metaphorically or literally sink the ship because we didn't have time to mediate another grudge or some shit.
Hell, if it was basically anyone else who was named as the biggest cause of trouble, we'd already evict them. We're evicting people because 'They're from the Danelaw, might have made enemies', 'They have the Slaughtershark Kenning, might cause trauble', 'They're kind of a show-off so might cause friction in the crew'.
I don't think it's the beardless thing. Barki's right here, just as an example. It's probably something like actually an outlaw or somesuch.