MagicalAmbitions
the rose in your vase
- Pronouns
- She/Her
i don't think this indicates the way that people feel towards strangers. I think it's an indication that people cannot fully comprehend big numbers and also don't have to process the weight of their decision if it's abstracted as "a great sum of strangers", just words on a page. When presented with the idea of "10,000 strangers dying" in a hypothetical this-or-that scenario, you don't really have to process the implications or theoretical impact of 10,000 people dying at your hands.While I think it's true to say that the hardline of 'most people hardly care at all about people they don't know personally' is inaccurate, I think it is also true that although most people do have some degree of care for strangers, it isn't that much. I remember seeing a fairly recent poll on Reddit which had thousands of respondents, and there were a bunch of options, but there two most chosen ones were 'you lose a limb' and '10,000 random strangers die instantly, with the latter being the more popular of those two (although accounting for the other options I think it was a large minority rather than a majority).
Now obviously that's just a poll on Reddit, but I do think that it is still a good demonstration of people's regard for strangers. There's definitely better evidence than a poll like that, but I just thought that it's pretty interesting and gets my point across.
It's like Roger Fisher's classic suggestion for nuclear deterrence
it's simply very easy to stop your consideration of the 10,000 strangers that die in the hypothetical at the abstract concept of "10,000 strangers". that isn't indicative of 'the way that most people view strangers', it's indicative of a cognitive trap that is easy to fall into - the idea of killing 10,000 strangers on it's own is very easy to consider horrible but not altogether very bad, because people dying is bad. But what if, say, you could see some of them? And they were begging and pleading for their lives, that you might spare them by incurring some other cost to yourself? What if you were forced to pull the trigger, in accordance with that choice? What if you had to watch as they were all lined up one-by-one?My suggestion was quite simple: Put that needed code number in a little capsule, and then implant that capsule right next to the heart of a volunteer. The volunteer would carry with him a big, heavy butcher knife as he accompanied the President. If ever the President wanted to fire nuclear weapons, the only way he could do so would be for him first, with his own hands, to kill one human being. The President says, "George, I'm sorry but tens of millions must die." He has to look at someone and realize what death is—what an innocent death is. Blood on the White House carpet. It's reality brought home.
When I suggested this to friends in the Pentagon they said, "My God, that's terrible. Having to kill someone would distort the President's judgment. He might never push the button."
also as mentioned, you're citing a reddit poll, so a decent number of the responses were probably instances of someone going "what is the most evil thing i could pick here" and similar. ergo, it's either a terrible demonstration of your point, or your point is itself terrible.