That was a matter of prestige - "Starfleet uses our designs!" They probably won't be nearly so keen on giving it to random backwater scrubs building their first ships, where a Lecarre might nab the design.Didn't the Amarki try lobbying for Starfleet to adopt the Riala? I think they just found a customer.
That was a matter of prestige - "Starfleet uses our designs!" They probably won't be nearly so keen on giving it to random backwater scrubs building their first ships, where a Lecarre might nab the design,
By the end of the decade we'll have more Rennies than Constitution-Bs, and considerably more Miranda-As. For that matter, the relative fragility of ConnieBee hulls makes them... less than entirely desirable... as frontline combatants, whereas the Renaissance-class can take as much pounding as an Excelsior with twice the size and half again the crew complement.I'm...not really comfortable with giving what's still our combat backbone away unless we're really planning to push Rennie construction. Which I don't think we are, technically.
Now I think that would be grossly unfair, if only because they are literally brand new construction...Also, the ConnieB is by WoG a time-limited design. We have stretched the frame the most it will tolerate. I suspect that in 10-15 years the ones that aren't shot up will start premature aging.
I strongly suspect that most of the schematics for the base Constitution-class starship can be found easily given that the design work on the class was done roughly eighty years ago. Cramming the amount of firepower and performance we've done into the hulls is mostly a result of advancing technology and I suspect anyone else could do the same. The bare fact that the Renaissance-class significantly outperforms the ConnieBee using the same technological palette and the same hull size indicates that they are NOT cutting-edge Federation technology.If they are struggling to create the infrastructure already just don't give them a capital ship, if we give them a frigate/cruiser with an upgrade path once they hit 300, they can start their navy now and grow it into a real force in the future.
I could be swayed on providing them a Constellation-A, but I hate the idea of giving a 100 Affiliate the Connie-B designs free and clear, we might as well just release them on the federation network for free instead.
I like this, and I like leaving up to the Tauni whether they want the Miranda-class or Patroller-A class.This makes the most sense to me given that they can't really build modern stuff. The Miranda and Constellation refits post-date the Connie-B anyway, and if we're looking at stuff a generation behind that's about the right place. Choice of Miranda (combat) or Patroller (patrol) for similar SR? Seems fine.
That is a tremendously fair point to take. I mean, they might not succeed, but I expect them to try as well.Another point is that I strongly suspect the Tauni will try to keep these designs secret, simply because they don't want their own enemies learning how to blow up their own ships.
I strongly suspect that most of the schematics for the base Constitution-class starship can be found easily given that the design work on the class was done roughly eighty years ago. Cramming the amount of firepower and performance we've done into the hulls is mostly a result of advancing technology and I suspect anyone else could do the same.
Another point is that I strongly suspect the Tauni will try to keep these designs secret, simply because they don't want their own enemies learning how to blow up their own ships.
Suspecting The Tauni will try to keep technology a secret is frankly not enough, and at a 100 affiliate, their 'enemies' are not our enemies, and their allies might not be ours.
Probably going to build at least 1-2 more per year for the next 10-15 years. Likely more since BV is planning 5 next year. They're the most potent singletons we have other than Excelsiors, and an Excelsior costs over double resources. I expect we'll switch to building more Keplers once we have them available but until then Rennies present a combination of our best individual combatants and responders.
The internals of the Constitution-B are notably behind our top-of-the-line hardware. We have every reason to think our competent rivals could design ships just as capable using their own hardware.We are not giving them the specs on a hull, we are giving them all they need to know to make a ship, internal tech included. All that 'advanced technology' stuffed inside a Connie-B? Thats what other powers would buy from the Tauni. Enough so that whomever it gets traded to 1st 2nd or 3rd hand may be just that little bit faster, their shields may be a little bit stronger, and they may just detect our ships a little bit easier.
(Note, taken a while to put this together with distractions, so apologies if the conversation has moved on)
To compare our current capital/cruiser designs (so no Constitution-B as we won't be building any more):
Figures pulled from various spreadsheets I've saved links to, so I hope they are right
Not including the Ambassador (be quite a while before we are building these for general use)
Excelsior-A (Capital)
230BR 160SR | 6O 5E 5T | 7C 6S 4H 6L 6P 6D
Renaissance (Cruiser)
100BR 70SR | 3O 5E 3T | 5C 3S 4H 5L 4P 5D
Constellation-A (Cruiser)
70BR 50SR | 2O 4E 2T | 4C 5S 3H 4L 4P 4D
Uh what spreadsheets are you looking at, because there's some misinformation that needs to be corrected.Figures pulled from various spreadsheets I've saved links to, so I hope they are right
Not including the Ambassador (be quite a while before we are building these for general use)
Excelsior-A (Capital)
230BR 160SR | 6O 5E 5T | 7C 6S 4H 6L 6P 6D
Renaissance (Cruiser)
100BR 70SR | 3O 5E 3T | 5C 3S 4H 5L 4P 5D
Constellation-A (Cruiser)
70BR 50SR | 2O 4E 2T | 4C 5S 3H 4L 4P 4D
Ah, yeah, they'd probably require Connie-A crewing.Anyways @OneirosTheWriter if the Tauni decided to use the Connie-B as an Explorer-capital ship a la our original Constitution-As and Excelsiors, would they have to add an extra point of O/E/T? Just basing that off In Excelsis.