Forgothrax
Not Going Gently
- Pronouns
- He/Him
Reorganise Starfleet Engineering Command to be a separate reporting Command that reports directly to Commander, Starfleet, 60pp
*Drools* do want! Auxiliary control time!
Reorganise Starfleet Engineering Command to be a separate reporting Command that reports directly to Commander, Starfleet, 60pp
The module system isn't ready and survey sensors don't have stats yet so we don't know. In absence of better knowledge we should stick with the plan we voted for and wait until next year at the earliest IMO.I'm thinking Indoria Starbase, Intel Gathering, RP, SR, and two BR colonies, Academy Expansion, maybe a tech team.
Ship people, are we ready to start Kepler work yet?
Are you sure?
If the ruins are on multiple planets in the same system, then the people who left them were probably beyond the "pottery" level.
It's on a world. It applies to a system.@OneirosTheWriter for our information, will the Heavy Industrial Park apply to both San Francisco Yards and Utopia Planitia if put in Sol system, or do we have to pick between Earth and Mars specifically? The wording switches between "world" and "system".
Does that mean the garrison requirements dropped to 9 as listed on the front page?Why wouldn't you now? It has transitioned from emergency management back to a normal border zone.
No.
We are waiting on survey sensors and modules.
I'm convinced we can squeeze another Shield out of the design with either.
Edit: There's debate on if we should go with the planned and pre-approved date, or start now so we can rush an escort.
I've had this Kepler hanging out on my design sheet for about a week. e: Edited for updated version, -5 SR, -1Q build time.
![]()
Might be possible to tune further with T2 subframes, but I don't recall what we plan on having researched in 2317/2318.Keeping in mind that we have to develop the Kepler within 5y of setting the goal back in 2313, we have to order the design by 2318, so any research past that point will not be available.
e: Updated with what's available in 2317, which allowed me to reduce engineering frame size while increasing hull frame size and moving to a M computer core to compensate. Anyway, 100/80 is the same cost as the Rennie, and 2/3/4 crew is reasonable for a science ship, and it will build in 2y 1q.
I don't think we get T3 shields, subframes, warp core, hull, coolant, or injectors by that time. We don't even have T2 tactical subframe yet and I don't see it on any research plans.
No. Just No.
SDB doesn't want the Kepler project yet, and going for a KBZ starbase now is ... questionable given that we'll be ratifying Caledonia soon and they should get one.
Deimos or Bust!
Not on your lifeWait. Does Sirvik's Bonus apply to the Ambassador twins too? DO WE GET TO TRIPLE STACK BONUSES?!?!?!
That would just be silly.Wait. Does Sirvik's Bonus apply to the Ambassador twins too? DO WE GET TO TRIPLE STACK BONUSES?!?!?!
Just to be clear; Sirvk knocks the build time of all Capital ships by a flat -1Qtr right? So Excelsiors go from 4 years to 3.75 years and Ambassadors, assuming he's still in that position when we start production Ambassadors, from 4.75 years to 4.50 years?
A design with modules looks to be about two stat points better, or able to reach S8 with little sacrifice in other areas, but modules are currently not ready for use.Jesus.
That Kepler.
That's Excelsior-level response capability on an escort platform that costs about 40% as much as an Excelsior.
Edit: Objection to plan withdrawn. Mostly. Still think an Indoria starbase is more pressing than a KBZ one. And would like to note that homeworld trumps major colony as a defense priority.