Starfleet Design Bureau

I don't think we need to refit the Stingray design to have 6 cannons. They would mostly be there for better firing arcs. And as stated when we first designed them, the Stingray is nimble enough that keeping an enemy within its firing arc shouldn't be difficult and any opponent that can stay out of it isn't something the Stingray should be tangling with in the first place.



This will be even more of the case with the improved engines.

That may not be the case if @Sayle does the same phaser layout diagram as was done for the NX. Since that changed the firepower for the NX.

Edit: whoops! Forgot to insert the quote!
 
0: Upgrade the Stingray-class (Warp 5 Engine, Impulse Thrusters) (30 Industry) (+3 Industry Cost)
1: Upgun the Stingray-class (Atomic Torpedoes, +3 Phase Cannons) (35 Industry) (+8 Industry Cost)
Mhh the full upgrade looks nice what the hell lets do it. 5 Nx enterprise and full upgrades
Not overcommit to building a large production run of explorers that are better at shooting things than scanning them.
You Understand that the NX is not just a Scientific explorer RIGHT? She is also a diplomatic vessel, Our Main Combat ship, Our main(and only) first responder to emergencies, and our main Anti piracy patrol vessel. Please explain why we will need less of them instead as many as we can built?
 
You Understand that the NX is not just a Scientific explorer RIGHT? She is also a diplomatic vessel, Our Main Combat ship, Our main(and only) first responder to emergencies, and our main Anti piracy patrol vessel. Please explain why we will need less of them instead as many as we can built?
I understand that the NX is not up to snuff as a scientific explorer, and so should not be used in that role at all, instead being used in the roles for which she was designed: planetary and interstellar defense, patrol, and internal relief. But that means we still need to actually build a scientific explorer, which will require industry, which will need to be conserved.
 
Last edited:
So you say we need less NX class ships(Just to be clear they are our mainline cruisers) for the reason that in a war they are the first ships to be recalled for combat duty? Then would more off them not be better? They ARE NOT Purely Science ships and as such the more of them we have the better.

I think the thought process there is to produce a limited number of them so we can have more ships in *general*, since quantity is a quality all it's own.

Part of what I was thinking. More NXs are great, but we already have a bunch of stringrays that could could get a huge boost to their usefulness without the need to build an entire new ship from scratch to fufill that need.

An NX that needs to be pulled back to perform stingray-like duties at warp 5(ish) is a big chunk of wasted time and industrial capacity on all those snazzy gubbins that NXs have that aren't useful (or might be overkill) in that scenario. They're a big gun for starfleet, but sometimes you just need a gun in the right place rather than a big one. I think leaving spare capacity for stingray refits is the best way of filling that potential need.

There's hardly a definitive right or wrong answer here though.
 
I understand that the NX is not up to snuff as a scientific explorer, and should not be used in that role at all, instead being used in the purposes for which she was built: planetary and interstellar defense, patrol, and internal relief. But that means we still need to actually build a scientific explorer, which will require industry, which will need to be conserved.
Not up to snuff? It has the best science output of any of the ships produced since we time traveled back to before the Federation was founded. To say it isn't up to snuff is disingenuous.

Does it have the most scientific facilities that could have been stuffed on it? No. Is it still the best ship at doing science that we have built? YES!
 
... Mirrorverse!Yoyodyne

there is nothing about the Fuckin' Galaxy-class that includes the word "pocket" :V

pocket as in "wow those peaceful exploration ship you have seem very armed" reads the headlines from the (not at all jealous) British Klingon Times

[X] Recommend a three-ship run over the next five years. (-27.6 Industry)
 
I understand that the NX is not up to snuff as a scientific explorer, and so should not be used in that role at all, instead being used in the roles for which she was designed: planetary and interstellar defense, patrol, and internal relief. But that means we still need to actually build a scientific explorer, which will require industry, which will need to be conserved.
Our NX is already better at the Exporatory job than the canon one was, and we even launched her complete and with a shakedown run. If our NX is a failure of an Exploratory ship, the Canon one was a disaster.

[X] Recommend a three-ship run over the next five years. (-27.6 Industry)
I'll say three because I did not expect us to get a production run PERIOD, and the extra economic power can help us refit the Stingrays and Zheng Hes.
 
Last edited:
[x] Recommend a five-ship run over the next five years. (-46 Industry)

Make the pointy-eared space elves afraid!
 
Our NX is already better at the Exporatory job than the canon one was, and we even launched her complete and with a shakedown run. If our NX is a failure of an Exploratory ship, the Canon one was a disaster.
We have no idea what the canon NX's Science stat would've been, but our version is definitely a bit lopsided in the Tactical and Engineering, and certainly doesn't have the canon ship's two science labs.

Along with the fact that Engineering doesn't really apply to Science stuff.
 
[X] Recommend a five-ship run over the next five years. (-46 Industry)

I personally believe we want engine rather than weapon upgrades regardless of cost, and as the engines are cheaper we don't need to go super cost-cutting on the NX production in order to get the Stingray refits done in a reasonable amount of time. We'll definitely want to go +Industry on our next Industry Or Tech choice with this, but it's such a solid design that I can't see Starfleet not getting massive use out of each one we build.
 
[X] Recommend a three-ship run over the next five years. (-27.6 Industry)

Im going with this option because if we do this, after the Stingray refits we will have enough industry to build two at once. Which will be EVEN MORE TERRIFYING FOR THE VULCANS!

"Vulcans are cowards, the only way to safeguard your place in the galaxy is by having a big gun!" -Admiral Black, Head of the SDB
 
[X] Recommend a three-ship run over the next five years. (-27.6 Industry)

We will have many demands on industry over the next few years, let's give ourselves a bit of slack to work with
 
Back
Top