- Location
- Washington
"X gonna give it to ya" is in fact one of the possible concessions, as I see things.It will fully, or partially, undermine the possibility of 'X gonna give it to ya'.
"X gonna give it to ya" is in fact one of the possible concessions, as I see things.It will fully, or partially, undermine the possibility of 'X gonna give it to ya'.
Boney's said this (while responding to you, actually) about the Black Essence:
Ok, this prompted me to think of another Black Essence spell we could make.I read that as the Apparition actually being in those places, but only visible to the target. Several Apparitions seem to be only visible to the person they're after. Now that you mention it, an Apparition that likes to physically get into all of the faceholes of the people in a specific area doesn't seem all that difficult to weaponize.
yeah."X gonna give it to ya" is in fact one of the possible concessions, as I see things.
I have heard this argument made before, and I find it very frustrating - I hope you'll forgive a small diatribe on the subject, not directed at you specifically.I've not commented on the topic, 'cuz i am Exhausted Man, here to be too burnt out to argue, but I hate the whole line of reasoning as going into this with the aim of getting concessions will fully, or partially, undermine the development of closer long term diplomatic relationships with Breton-
I am not making that argument, or any argument that implies that either approach will worsen diplomatic relationships with Bretonnia and if that is what you have taken from my post then I have picked my words poorly.I have heard this argument made before, and I find it very frustrating - I hope you'll forgive a small diatribe on the subject, not directed at you specifically.
We are not obligated to go out of our way to get a worse deal than we would by waiting. It is not going to "damage relations" to literally pay them to join a Project we think they will want to join up with later.
If this reasoning was valid, all trade would be damaging diplomatic relations, because we're charging them for things we think they want, instead of paying them to take our goods. In reality, trade between nations fosters friendship, even when neither nation is trying to give the other trade partner an unreasonably good deal.
Bretonnia is not going to be upset with us for making the Project's value obvious enough they'll want to join of their own volition. We aren't holding them at gunpoint.
That is actually a good point... Also I'm easily swayed because I wanna do the iron ork actionI am not making that argument, or any argument that implies that either approach will worsen diplomatic relationships with Bretonnia and if that is what you have taken from my post then I have picked my words poorly.
This is a zero-sum consideration in my eyes.
Maybe there's multipliers goin on here rather than a more simple "+'s to one means -'s to the other",
But: getting them in sooner will give us a weaker bargaining position for what we know compared to getting them in later.
And getting them in later will give us less time working with them on mutual goals and less time improving relationships.
----
I'm not saying that relationships would be damaged.
I'm saying that the opportunity to improve relationships would be lost.
And I want to reach for that opportunity, and I don't care about getting whatever concessions might be on the table if we come to them in a better bargaining position when asking them to join the project and I hope a sufficient number of other voters have a similar preference to mine.
A silent majority, except not literally corpses, because we don't have suffrage for dead people.
Probably because necromancy isn't real.
Oh, shit yeah.That is actually a good point... Also I'm easily swayed because I wanna do the iron ork action
I see! That makes more sense. I apologise - it seemed you were making the other argument, which has been made before.I am not making that argument, or any argument that implies that either approach will worsen diplomatic relationships with Bretonnia and if that is what you have taken from my post then I have picked my words poorly.
This is a zero-sum consideration in my eyes.
Maybe there's multipliers goin on here rather than a more simple "+'s to one means -'s to the other",
But: getting them in sooner will give us a weaker bargaining position for what we know compared to getting them in later.
And getting them in later will give us less time working with them on mutual goals and less time improving relationships.
----
I'm not saying that relationships would be damaged.
I'm saying that the opportunity to improve relationships would be lost.
And I want to reach for that opportunity, and I don't care about getting whatever concessions might be on the table if we come to them in a better bargaining position when asking them to join the project and I hope a sufficient number of other voters have a similar preference to mine.
A silent majority, except not literally corpses, because we don't have suffrage for dead people.
Probably because necromancy isn't real.
I think Boney said he would treat doing Iron Orcs as a recruitment action, so we wouldn't be doing them separately like youre suggestingthen do the Iron Orcs action, then try to bring them into the project
look man.I see! That makes more sense. I apologise - it seemed you were making the other argument, which has been made before.
I'd still argue that going off and doing the Iron Orcs action as a separate thing will engender more goodwill than bringing them on earlier will. Not least because we've been told that things have only been calm so fa because the project members haven't really had to interact outside of meetings. We've been told that the project is going to start get politically heated later on - not a conducive environment for improving relations.
The political goodwill is going to come from having successfully worked together after the fact, not during it. In that sense, late joiners who still contribute are probably better off in that regard, dodging some of the arguments to come.
Look I wanna hang back and chill and just share a few Mary Jane's with her.and that's only going to be amplified by being in our debt and using the Coin. That's probably our best chance of getting direct Fey Enchantress bullshit rolling.
No, still works how he wants, because the order is kept so it should work.I think Boney said he would treat doing Iron Orcs as a recruitment action, so we wouldn't be doing them separately like youre suggesting
I think it'd be a stronger negotiating position to make the promise of Iron Orc scouting during negotiations, rather than just doing it and letting them decide how much it's "worth" after the fact. I'm happy to roll it into the deal as a whole, though.IMO, the best way to get maximum value from Bretonnia is to get a working basic Waystone prototype, then do the Iron Orcs action, then try to bring them into the project (with the Coin on Father, if we assume the Lady is a Daughter).
With a working prototype, Bretonnia basically has to properly ante up if they want to be part of the project going forwards as we start working towards a scalable and deployable version, and that's only going to be amplified by being in our debt and using the Coin. That's probably our best chance of getting direct Fey Enchantress bullshit rolling.
I think it'd be a stronger negotiating position to make the promise of Iron Orc scouting during negotiations, rather than just doing it and letting them decide how much it's "worth" after the fact. I'm happy to roll it into the deal as a whole, though.
Honestly I wouldn't want her permanently involved but I imagine having damsel who can throw questions back at her would be as my ideal solution.I've started on the big Apparition post, but it turns out writing up overviews for 9 different Apparitions takes a bit, so in the meantime I want to pose a question on the current topic: Do we want the Fey Enchantress involved? Yeah, it's cool, and she's the best from a pure magical theory perspective, but she's also an immensely imporant political figure who's used to operating in a context where she is effectively unquestionable.
We'd have to get a Waystone working very fast to be negotiating on the same turn we Gigaflex. If we pull that off then sure, that's a compelling argument for that specific turnConsider tho: This is gonna be during our gigaflex turn. Just presenting us solving the Iron Orcs as a fait accompli is significantly more of a flex.
That's a fair point.I'm not sure if that is the case. To put some examaples Zlata has been with us from the very beginning of the project and I don't really feel we've imrproved our relationship with the Ice Witches in this time, same for house Tindonel or Laurelorn in general (sure they may be closer to us because of the actions that we have been taking, but not because of the Waystone Project by itself).
My point is that just because they're in the project sooner it doesn't mean our relationships with Bretonnia will improve. Which I feel is something that is getting treated as a fact, we get someone into the project==we are now friends or we will be friends into the future, just because they're in the project.