Personally I disagree that the no IF plan will sabotage state stability. A fraction of IF becoming more radicalised probably doesn't mean a lot of people willing to use violence. I figure with a significant boost to InOps (as we're already providing) they aren't likely to achieve much[X] Plan Attempting To Go To Space (grudgingly with Initiative First)
[X] Plan All The Spinoffs And No Radicalization For You Mr IF
I do confess to feeling rather disarmed, I don't like the leading plan for it's space over-reach and inflexibility promise to the director (particularly in combination with one another) but I also feel I can't not chip into the variant that doesn't sabotage state stability. The popularity of the plan obligates me to contribute to the popularity of the plan.