- Location
- New Brunswick, NJ
- Pronouns
- He/Him/His
This is the thread at maximum Pickle, isn't it?
we should have never have gone full Pickle...
This is the thread at maximum Pickle, isn't it?
we should have never have gone full Pickle...
No that person is playing 5-dimensional chess while us mere mortals are stuck at 2-dimensional. You see naming our branch WEIR will forever have people confused across species.It amuses me that someone is currently voting for World's Edge Intersectional Research. Odds are the actual fact is that they simply either missed the third or fifth word in WEBIR or WEIRD, but the absurdist in me likes the idea of a research institute --- situated on the top of a mountain well away from any major river --- being named after a kind of lowhead dam.
You don't say beerd (bird), beerthday (birthday), or beerch (birch).
Also Eonir, Aesir, Vanir, etc.You would say irrespective that way, irresponsible and irrigation.
In mine (mixed-UK) they're also generally pronounced the same, but only because the second syllable's vowel is essentially ignored. Weber, Webir, Webur and Webar would all be pronounced with the same vowel sound (ə).Just as a datapoint, at least in my variety of English (US Northeastern accent), they are pronounced the same, which might be why I appreciate the not-pun more than some.
You would say irrespective that way, irresponsible and irrigation. You also generally don't use the same letter multiple times in different syllables Web is its own syllable so why would you then start the second using the last letter of the first?
Counterpoint: "irradiate." English just doesn't have consistent vowel pronunciation.
Why would you be so confident that Weber/Webir breaks down as Web - er/ir as opposed to We - ber/bir? Consider webbing vs webing, the second one obviously isn't a word, but if you try to sound it out as if it was an unfamiliar word it's far more natural to go with we - bing rather than web - ing.You also generally don't use the same letter multiple times in different syllables Web is its own syllable so why would you then start the second using the last letter of the first?
I refuse to side with any argument that is based on the concept of weebingWhy would you be so confident that Weber/Webir breaks down as Web - er/ir as opposed to We - ber/bir? Consider webbing vs webing, the second one obviously isn't a word, but if you try to sound it out as if it was an unfamiliar word it's far more natural to go with we - bing rather than web - ing.
That makes it sound like you have an extremely fragmented accent. When you say riding does it come out as "ride-ing" with a slight pause? Because in my speech the second syllable is "ding" for the simple reason that I don't end the d before I begin the ing. I'm not using it twice, I'm just not pausing long enough to get rid of it before moving on.You also generally don't use the same letter multiple times in different syllables Web is its own syllable so why would you then start the second using the last letter of the first?
The first syllable of riding doesn't have a d though. It's pronounced rye-ding. At least that's how everyone I've heard pronounces it.That makes it sound like you have an extremely fragmented accent. When you say riding does it come out as "ride-ing"? Because in my speech the second syllable is "ding" for the simple reason that I don't end the d before I begin the ing. I'm not using it twice, I'm just not pausing long enough to get rid of it before moving on.
The first syllable is pronounced identically to the sole syllable of "ride" in my accent.The first syllable of riding doesn't have a d though. It's pronounced rye-ding. At least that's how everyone I've heard pronounces it.
Most people hear in their head ("subvocalise") when reading (especially when reading names). Not everyone obviously, but the majority.... And not to put too fine a point on it, but this is a written story. How are you all expecting pronunciation to come up in the first place?
Wait but wouldn't that limit your reading speed to the speed of speech?Most people hear in their head ("subvocalise") when reading (especially when reading names). Not everyone obviously, but the majority.
No, because subvocalisation can be significantly faster than speech. It can go about the same speed as hearing. (EDIT: Also because it's relatively easy to only subvocalise some of the words, skipping things like "of" and "the".)Wait but wouldn't that limit your reading speed to the speed of speech?
Here's a good source for the IPA vowel soundsOr we could just use the IPA instead of ad hoc comparisons totally dependent on dialect for this irrelevent tangent? Pretty please?
To give a pronunciation approximation that doesn't rely on too much on regional commonalities (I hope), the -er in Weber is pronounced as in Fletcher or Butcher. Fletchir and Butchir aren't the same, right?
I'm sorry. I'm not fluent in IPA. I have no idea how ə is pronounced and if it's closer to the Greek ε or ι.Or we could just use the IPA instead of ad hoc comparisons totally dependent on dialect for this irrelevent tangent? Pretty please?
To give a pronunciation approximation that doesn't rely on too much on regional commonalities (I hope), the -er in Weber is pronounced as in Fletcher or Butcher. Fletchir and Butchir aren't the same, right?