Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting will open in 1 day, 5 hours
And that it can be done without said trait as long as you give the winds enough room - which putting one on "engine" and another on "wheels" would do.

Or are you saying that we don't know if someone can wear Jade enchanted armour and wield a Bright enchanted sword?

We know how different winds interact in the context of being borne by a person, but not a tank. As far as we know no one has ever done magic on a tank and the issue of finding out is complicated by someone being willing to hand us a tank which I do not see as guaranteed by any means.
 
There are lots of things you can achieve without the trait, it's just that the Eye of Gazul is the one that Mathilde did.
A gold and a jade mage working together could make a steam tank have inexhaustible fuel and leave no tracks as it passed through the wilderness without needing windherder.


Quite the opposite going by QM statements. The fact there are 5 other fields means that the focus is broader, and thus there's less of a hook for why to go to that college.

When our college is unlikely to have more than 10 or so members for quite a while if you're only interested in 1/6th of the subjects then you've got a ~50% chance of turning up and finding out you're the only person interested in that - and therefore wishing you'd stayed in Altdorf.

When there's one key theme you're guaranteed to find others who share your interest.

A theme of Collaboration is no research theme at all though? It's.. hmm the best I can put it would be this, if I were a researcher reading the charter for this proposed college I'd be expecting to work directly with a priest on either enchanting items together and seeing how magic and the divine work together or with a runesmith to again make magical items that use both windmagic and runic magic. It's working on understanding how those fields can complement each other rather than researching other things together, important but a very different concept to what is being envisaged previously.

Where as the other college charter has a fairly open remit which BoneyM is interpreting as natural philosophy and artifice which is only two focuses, not the six being touted.

And that it can be done without said trait as long as you give the winds enough room - which putting one on "engine" and another on "wheels" would do.

Or are you saying that we don't know if someone can wear Jade enchanted armour and wield a Bright enchanted sword?

That's not multi-wind enchantments though and it's also not really a collaborative project except in the loosest sense? Multi-wind is about being on the same item it's an armour with both winds, the proximity of the winds involved isn't supposed to be a tower over.


That's not very helpful given not everyone has time to read every single post. :eyeroll:

Regardless I've read the subsequent messages from people quoting me and I've realized I really like the Library aspect of CUCC but I also like the College aspect of RRSR. If there was a plan that put them together it'd be perfect honestly.


Yeah okay this changes things for me. If this interpretation is correct I'm going to have to support RRSR too, not just CUCC. So unless someone comes up with a plan that puts RRSR's College wording with CUCC's Library wording, or unless someone points out why this interpretation is wrong, I'm just going to vote for RRSR and approval vote CUCC.

Edit: Noticed someone did come up with a plan that puts them together and I'm voting for that instead of CUCC and approval voting RRSR since I care more about the College and can tolerate a slightly more subpar Library (especially given Belegar is still probably going to go ham on it).

[X] Plan: Research, References, and A Sweet Ride
[X] Plan: Cleaned Up College of Collaboration


[X] Plan: Research, References, and A Sweet Library
[X] Plan: Research, References, and A Sweet Ride

You have to delete the voted line not just strike through it. The vote tally will still read your CUCC line as a vote.
 
...Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't this still count as a vote, even with the strikethrough?
Based on my experiences with the Markgraf/Waystone vote, no.

If you are not aware what differences exist, ask, claiming there are none is unhelpfull.
I think I worded my message in a way that invited someone to correct me. And they did. And I changed my votes appropriately. So I don't think your message applies here.
 
Last edited:
We know how different winds interact in the context of being borne by a person, but not a tank. As far as we know no one has ever done magic on a tank and the issue of finding out is complicated by someone being willing to hand us a tank which I do not see as guaranteed by any means.
Fine - collaboration on the accoutrements of a horse. Or on a building. Or on a road. Or on a farm.

The tank was simply one possible example out of a myriad of possibilities - don't fixate on it too much.
 
[X] Plan: Research, References, and A Sweet Ride
[X] Plan: Research, References, and A Sweet Library

I'll approval vote, but i can't help but feel the difference in the library charter is fairly minimal.
 
A theme of Collaboration is no research theme at all though? It's.. hmm the best I can put it would be this, if I were a researcher reading the charter for this proposed college I'd be expecting to work directly with a priest on either enchanting items together and seeing how magic and the divine work together or with a runesmith to again make magical items that use both windmagic and runic magic. It's working on understanding how those fields can complement each other rather than researching other things together, important but a very different concept to what is being envisaged previously.
So you wouldn't see the "work with mages of other winds" aspect of the phrasing? Only the bit about also working with the divine?

Feels like your hypothetical researcher would look at the charter:
"Research (multi-wind studies (including waystones), geological, metallurgical, and ecological studies, enchanting and artifice)"
and believe it only applied to multi-wind studies that involved metallurgy and enchanting, meaning it'd be insanely narrow.

That's not multi-wind enchantments though and it's also not really a collaborative project except in the loosest sense? Multi-wind is about being on the same item it's an armour with both winds, the proximity of the winds involved isn't supposed to be a tower over.
If multiple people are working together to achieve a goal it's a collaboration. They don't have to literally be touching each other the whole time. By your standards Mathilde has never collaborated with anyone on anything...
 
I think I worded my message in a way that invited someone to correct me. And they did. And I changed my votes appropriately. So I don't think your message applies here.
Well my first thought was to wonder if you were intentionally trying to troll people, because someone coming in and just saying that everyone debating for the last couple pages are obviously wrong does not sound like a good faith argument.
My first response was, not as polite as the one i posted, because of that, so i do think my message applies here.
 
[X] Plan: Research, References, and A Sweet Library

I rather think the panic that a collaborative college will suddenly be incapable of doing literally any other research... not necessarily unfounded, but perhaps a bit overblown. On the other hand, I also don't really have a horse in that race anyways as long as the split focus for a library doesn't win and the big library is inclusive, so...
 
If multiple people are working together to achieve a goal it's a collaboration. They don't have to literally be touching each other the whole time. By your standards Mathilde has never collaborated with anyone on anything...

I mean are we still talking about wind herding? It kind of requires that the winds be interfacing in a magical item? It's like yes on the wider sense they're collaborating but not magically? It's like if two engineers work very different parts of a car, you're right they're collaborating but they're definitely not working together on the individual parts. Wind herding seems to be about working together on the individual parts, likewise as a research project I'd be expecting the researchers to be working on the individual parts together in this college, not just broadly on the same project as like part of a production line.

Things that don't interact directly don't require any research because they aren't interacting? Using a fire enchanted sword and a gold enchanted armour doesn't carry any risk as I understand it so it wouldn't be a valid field of research for multi-wind enchanting. Where as fire and gold in armour would be.

Maybe I'm not following this conversation properly?
 
Last edited:
I mean are we still talking about wind herding? It kind of requires that the winds be interfacing in a magical item? It's like yes on the wider sense they're collaborating but not magically? It's like if two engineers work very different parts of a car, you're right they're collaborating but they're definitely not working together on the individual parts. Wind herding seems to be about working together on the individual parts, likewise as a research project I'd be expecting the researchers to be working on the individual parts together in this college, not just broadly on the same project as like part of a production line.
Take another look at the charter, it makes zero mentions of windherding.

Windherding is a true masterpiece of collaboration, but putting it in the charter as the thing we expect all mages to do would be very much over-eager. Less intensive collaborations have a hell of a lot of value, and they let people learn the skills that eventually lead to windherding.
 
Studies involving collaboration between the Colleges of Magic, and between the Colleges and divine miracle-workers, with a particular focus on working with Runesmiths.

Yes, this charter does not mention windherding.
In fact, it is so vague that it is very hard to say what it even means, other than "jolly cooperation", hopefully with runesmiths (whose opinion on this has not been asked before hand).
 
In fact, it is so vague that it is very hard to say what it even means, other than "jolly cooperation", hopefully with runesmiths (whose opinion on this has not been asked before hand).
Mathilde can 100% arrange Runesmiths even if, for some reason, all the ones she's already met have suddenly decided they don't like working with mages anymore.
 
[X] Plan: Research, References, and A Sweet Library

I rather think the panic that a collaborative college will suddenly be incapable of doing literally any other research... not necessarily unfounded, but perhaps a bit overblown. On the other hand, I also don't really have a horse in that race anyways as long as the split focus for a library doesn't win and the big library is inclusive, so...

So I'm currently part of a project that is a collab between a few universities, and my arguably anecdotal experience so far is that it tends to be fairly chaotic and lacking in subject depth. Don't get me wrong, its been a ton of fun and a great opportunity to meet new people! But I still feel like clear and seperated fields of research will allow for a lot more subject depth and a greater group of interested people to recruit.
 
So I'm currently part of a project that is a collab between a few universities, and my arguably anecdotal experience so far is that it tends to be fairly chaotic and lacking in subject depth. Don't get me wrong, its been a ton of fun and a great opportunity to meet new people! But I stil feel like clear and seperated fields of research will allow for a lot more subject depth and a greater group of interested people to recruit.
How many people are you picturing being involved in this branch college?

Because I highly doubt we're going to get the 30+ people we'd need to have six clear and separate fields of research.
 
I wake up and find my current favorite plans losing basically because of overblown claims about what it won't do. Annoying.

I mean this list is kind of bonkers. There's nothing about a solid half of things here that comes under the definition of collaboration and with the way you're using it literally anything could conceivably be part of it

Yes. That is the point you are missing. It is *flexible*. It is designed to cover research, and spell design, and the creation of artifacts, and everything we want to do. You are somehow reading that flexibility, that intended openness, as excluding everything.

It doesn't.

The eye of Gazul is also a mountain. That is a lot of room to work with which most items do not have. It also involved the skills of Kragg the Grim. If that is the standards of skill you need to 'wind herd' then a wide ranging ability that does not look to be.

It is the most famous thing in the Karak and it is a prime example of collaboration. Doing things like it is the whole point of a college of collaboration.

A theme of Collaboration is no research theme at all though?

No.

You keep reading this, thinking "oh, collaboration isn't a thing, it's a process" and then deciding that because it is a process every actual *thing* is excluded.

Any research that involves a wizard from more than one college is included.

And given there are *already* places that are built to do all the "natural sciences and artifacts" research stuff, in Altdorf, the actual reason to come to K8P is the dwarves and the cross-college colab. This just formalizes that.
 
[X] Plan: Research, References, and A Sweet Library

This is the last version, right?


[X] Plan: Cleaned Up College of Collaboration
 
Last edited:
Mathilde can 100% arrange Runesmiths even if, for some reason, all the ones she's already met have suddenly decided they don't like working with mages anymore.
Yes, Mathilde can.
Though i would not go so far as 100%, 75% maybe, 50% at surely, assuming we can come up with a project they are interested in and can do without giving up any runic secrets.
So once Mathilde stops being active participant the whole thing starts to come down.

And working with mages is different from working with Mathilde, or doing anykind of indepth research.

How many people are you picturing being involved in this branch college?

Because I highly doubt we're going to get the 30+ people we'd need to have six clear and separate fields of research.
To have six clear and separate fields of research, we need 6 people interested in those separate fields.
I'm kinda hoping to get 10+ wizards, maybe 16 if lucky.
Atleast one per college would be nice for the duration of the waystone project, thought jades and golds might be more interested if we go for the natural philosophy and artefact charter.

This may not be definitive, but Windherder is on the character sheet as a skill, not a trait.
Hmmm, that's odd.
Could we train mountain mystic as a skill? :thonk:
Ok, the odds of being able to train windherder goes up a bit then i guess.
 
Honestly that thing that annoys me most is that if we read the RRSR charter as uncharitably as the college of collaboration is getting read, it would exclude cooperation between different colleges because that isn't specified.
 
Honestly that thing that annoys me most is that if we read the RRSR charter as uncharitably as the college of collaboration is getting read, it would exclude cooperation between different colleges because that isn't specified.

I mean it kind of is, with charity or without.

Colleges: All

It can be assumed they will be collaborating simply by being involved, otherwise we would not have an option of having more than one College
 
Voting will open in 1 day, 5 hours
Back
Top