Given the time period, I'd say that most people don't know enough about electricity for that kind of symbolism-based thinking to work.
Eh, electricity is a little more common than in similar periods IRL, because lightning magic exists. It might not be completely common knowledge, but I expect it to be more widespread than history would tell us.
Thats the point. Its the fifth and arguably least critical element of their defense, because where the other elements will allow an invasion if they are gone, the trade dominance only makes existing difficulties worse - if the Empire has the political will to pave over the marsh then they've already fucked up far, far worse, and it cannot carry out an embargo without naval dominance.
Its strategic defense role is overstated, its mainly a massive moneymaker, because having a monopoly on Imperial riverine trade lets them take whatever price they want.
So, why are you quoting me when you say this? My point was that the canal breaks their trade monopoly and therefore makes them less attractive to invade. It does bring the side benefit of meaning the First Fleet isn't stuck in Altdorf if it's needed at sea and Marienburg aren't cooperating though.
Can't actually address this point without going deeper into economics than I have the time for, but that is only true on a very superficial reading of things. High value goods, which can be luxury items, high quality equipment, books or reagents are valuable for moving productivity around, beyond the very real importance of things like saltpeter or high grade steel being moved on the same channels
But unless those things are being imported from foreign polities, or shipped in from Nordland/Ostland, the existing infrastructure still works normally. Like, Marienburg blocks sea access, but doesn't stop the Empire moving anything and everything it can on the rivers once they get there. And because the river system flows through so much of the Empire, I don't believe they move large quantities of necessary goods through Marienburg anyway. I think they mostly move international imports and exports. Which in a world where you can't count on not going to war with anyone, most likely means largely luxury goods.
The question you invite, then, is "do the Imperial ports on the north coast, the ones not connected to the Reik river network, HAVE those advantages?"
The other question is "is it feasible for the bulk of the Imperial economy to plug itself into the maritime trade of these ports in any meaningful way, or does the tyranny of overland distance, complicated by the need to get past terrain obstacles like beastman-haunted forests and mountains, prevent this?"
Which are all fair questions. I think that if given enough time, yes, the Empire could eventually move its international trade. It wouldn't be quick or easy, but it could be done. Plus, they do something of a trade with whichever tribe of the Norse aren't raiding them that year IIRC.
So you get a situation where luxury goods can flow to and from the sea in the Empire, but essentials cannot, at least not without paying Marienburger taxes.
But what essentials are they shipping by sea? Internal goods, aside from to and from Ostland/Nordland can still travel by the river network, whether the mouth of the Reik is blockaded or not.
Yes, but Elector Counts are expected to march to each other's defense in the face of a pre-eminent threat, and the Empire has historically shown up when Kislev was existentially threatened by Chaos (the only thing that usually hits the Empire through Kislev).
Marienburg getting to sit such wars out entirely and not pay any taxes to Imperial coffers to finance the Emperor's own forces is a much more extreme form of free-riding than the Elector Counts engage in.
I was thinking more of Chaos Warbands or trolls. Not necessarily existential threats, but thing sthat the Empire would have to deal with if Kislev wasn't there. And they provide no support for taht, so far as I know. And indeed, they don't always march to Kislev's defense. They did for Asvar Kul and maybe Morkar, but apart from that, nothing.
The Elector Counts are theoretically bound to march to each other's defense. Pretty sure they don't always do that though. Indeed, there was that scene with the Emperor and Heidi, where they ran down a list of the Counts and why none of them would bother to help with Sylvania, despite 'Eastern Stirland' being an active warzone.
Earlier you observe that the Empire totally has sea access. I point out that their sea access is marginal and not connected with their main industrial centers by water.
Now you note that they have a third-rate Navy.
Do you think that's a coincidence?
I think the Empire has always had a third rate navy, even when it owned Marienburg. It doesn't need or want an actually powerful navy, it wants to defend its coastline from Norscan raids, which it does. It needs a sea port to tap into international sea trade at all, but I don't think Marienburg specifically is vital to the Empire, even if they'd love to have it.
Beyond the fact that the Chamberlain considered it a pretty serious matter, these are some quotes from Boney at the time the vote was about responses to the embargo.
This is all very interesting, thanks. I don't believe it undermines my ultimate point (possession of Marienburg is not necessary for the Empire to have international trade - arguably it's able to have sea trade too - even if the canal stopped existing).
If memory serves, it's not so much that the treaty is worded strangely, but rather that the treaty was negotiated with a legal entity- the Duchy of Westerland- that hasn't existed in almost 200 years. And Ulthuan has been coy about if they consider themselves bound to the treaty or not, given that fact.
Ah, thanks. I knew it was something like that. Brings up the interesting question of how the treaty works if the Barony of Westerland became a thing again though.
Interesting discussion, but I'm going away for a bit because it's late. Just an FYI if people want to continue later.