Tasoli
Life is for Living
- Location
- Behind the Keyboard.
Alternate account for Manaan named like true MMO gamer.
Alternate account for Manaan named like true MMO gamer.
She'd be a Saber.The real question is, would Mathilde by melee, ranged, magic, or summoner?
Stromfels' followers have claimed He's the True Aspect (tm) of Manaan since at least 2e:Wait just to be clear, the Cult of Stromfels did not exist until Marienburg's treaty? This is canon lore from WFRP 1e? Was Stromfels a name for an aspect of Manann like Manalt or what?
EDIT: WFRP 4e: Sea of Claws p88, The Cult of Stromfels chapter:
Does this lore have anything to do with the lore you're drawing from or is it contradictory?
That Ulthuan's treaty with Marienburg led to the Manaanites to abandon the more violent parts of Manaan and then those outlawed parts became Stromfels is news to me, though.Tome of Salvation said:Theologians often debate the nature of Stromfels, some claiming him to be a primeval Norscan God, whilst others see him as an aspect of the Blood God. Other scholars muse— never within earshot of a follower of Manann, of course—that the two Gods are one and the same, that Stromfels is merely an ancient aspect of Manann. Priests of Manann vociferously disagree.
Followers of Stromfels see things differently, however, viewing their God neither as an aspect nor sect, but as Manann viewed as he truly is—Manann the Destroyer, the furious and unbridled wrath of the sea. Stromfels is worshipped by the raiders of the Sea of Claws, by wreckers along the coastal and river regions of the Empire, and by pirates throughout the Old World, especially in Sartosa where he is worshipped openly.
Wait just to be clear, the Cult of Stromfels did not exist until Marienburg's treaty? This is canon lore from WFRP 1e? Was Stromfels a name for an aspect of Manann like Manalt or what?
EDIT: WFRP 4e: Sea of Claws p88, The Cult of Stromfels chapter:
Does this lore have anything to do with the lore you're drawing from or is it contradictory?
I wonder what drove those followers of Manann outside of Marienburg to go along with disassociating from Stromfels rather than schisming. Was that aspect of Manaan already unpopular with many of His followers?
Well for one I can't imagine the human sacrifice and boat sinking was that popular to begin with.
Human sacrifice without a religious aspect is not a sacrifice, just an execution. If executions of criminals are human sacrifices, the Stalinian Purges made the atheistic USSR even more devout than the Aztecs. And most religions in history didn't engage in human sacrifice, which shows it wasn't very popular.Human sacrifice probably was. It has been, in various forms, popular even though real human histiry and even excluding religious aspects, have often been a form of entertrainment although in that case, it was done to people perceived to be criminals (hangings in the wild West, Guilotine in French Revolution, public burnings ofwitchesno wait, in reality it was mostly heretics apart from Salem, etc.
Human sacrifice probably was. It has been, in various forms, popular even though real human histiry and even excluding religious aspects, have often been a form of entertrainment although in that case, it was done to people perceived to be criminals (hangings in the wild West, Guilotine in French Revolution, public burnings ofwitchesno wait, in reality it was mostly heretics apart from Salem, etc.
Boats, on the other hand, are terribly expensive
I wonder what drove those followers of Manann outside of Marienburg to go along with disassociating from Stromfels rather than schisming. Was that aspect of Manaan already unpopular with many of His followers?
Human sacrifice without a religious aspect is not a sacrifice, just an execution. If executions of criminals are human sacrifices, the Stalinian Purges made the atheistic USSR even more devout than the Aztecs. And most religions in history didn't engage in human sacrifice, which shows it wasn't very popular.
Warhammer is generally trying to be grimmer than real life, this quest aside. And even in history, not only the evilest of Gods want sacrifice, so why would only Chaos want it in Warhammer?
Imagine you are a good Sigmarite standing all snug in your bed, you hear about the raiders from the north and their sacrifices on foul altars, you hear about the witch elves and their Cauldrons of Blood... and then you hear that some priests of Manann also do that. Human sacrifice has a bad reputation in the Empire, even though if you dig deep enough you can probably find bits and pieces of old rites that required it in all sorts of places. The whole test of the flame in Middleheim for instance might well have started as a sacrifice to Ulric with those the Wolf God respected being spared. Manann just clung onto those primordial rites a lot longer, but the trend of the modern empire is less human sacrifice, preferably none, because it has bad associations.
We're really stretching the meaning of the term "sacrifice" if we count non-religious executions as being an example on the grounds that they're "entertainment"Eh, I think an execution done as a way to entertrain the public is a sacrifice in a sense, although maybe not if we adhere by an exact definition of it.
Executing someone with no audience indeed has no connection to it.
I am unreasonably excited about the possibility of shade being thrown on Templar Witch Hunters in relation to medieval banking principles.No, the necessity gives an organic impetus to check in on the fief every so often. But liquidity won't be a problem. If Mathilde needs money in Ulthuan she'll be able to get it, and it'll give me an opportunity to expound on medieval banking principles and indirectly throw shade at the 'Templar' Witch Hunters.
That's not just stretching the exact definition of sacrifice, that's making baloon animals out of it.Eh, I think an execution done as a way to entertrain the public is a sacrifice in a sense, although maybe not if we adhere by an exact definition of it.
Executing someone with no audience indeed has no connection to it.
That's not just stretching the exact definition of sacrifice, that's making baloon animals out of it.
Not just in an academic context. Human sacrifice is by definition sacrificing a human to a higher power, which has precisely nothing to do with the execution of criminals. Executions are about punishing people committing crimes and trying to frighten people into not doing the thing that than the guy getting executed, not entertaining the public.Sure, in an academic context, but the discussion was about humans accepting sacrifices as a thing, and the fact that they did it nonreligiously for entertrainment implies they are more than willing, is my point.
...Much.Executions are about punishing people committing crimes and trying to frighten people into not doing the thing that than the guy getting executed, not entertaining the public.
Oh no they entertain the public quite a bit, it's just that that's not really a goal just a side effect.
If Mathilde needs money in Ulthuan she'll be able to get it, and it'll give me an opportunity to expound on medieval banking principles and indirectly throw shade at the 'Templar' Witch Hunters.
Human sacrifice has a bad reputation in the Empire, even though if you dig deep enough you can probably find bits and pieces of old rites that required it in all sorts of places.
Besides which, the primary point of public executions wasn't entertainment, it was deterrence
"Do not [do this thing] or else [this] happens to you"
I don't think those are really mutually exclusive in any way, that message comes with an implicit, "Don't be a 'Bad person' or we'll do this to you too."I thought it was legitimacy.
"This is a Bad Person and they are getting what is coming to them because of Our Rule".
They say justice is always the first service protogovernments provide, whether bronze age or modern areas of governmental collapse.
The question then becomes, what was the impetus to begin regarding human sacrifice as bad?
If Ulrica and Taal had sacrifices and a bunch of the old rites did too, when did the turn to humanism happen and why?
It seems like Shalaya would be the obvious answer, but that implies lot of low-level penetration of her ideas into society. Sigmar, because he was human? Idk did Sigmar ever have the sacrifice thing beyond burning heretics?
if i remember right, there was something, somewhere, about how Lothern loaners are happy to give out loans to people.No, the necessity gives an organic impetus to check in on the fief every so often. But liquidity won't be a problem. If Mathilde needs money in Ulthuan she'll be able to get it, and it'll give me an opportunity to expound on medieval banking principles and indirectly throw shade at the 'Templar' Witch Hunters.