I'm going to be boring and say we probably cannot plan next turn yet, not when we have one Waystone action, the library action and all the socials to go before then.
That's true in detail. But we can make vague notions. Again, I'd really like a personal turn for Mathilde where a bit of self improvement and research would get done.I'm going to be boring and say we probably cannot plan next turn yet, not when we have one Waystone action, the library action and all the socials to go before then.
That's true in detail. But we can make vague notions. Again, I'd really like a personal turn for Mathilde where a bit of self improvement and research would get done.
Huh, it seems some of these topics are out of alphabetical order.Dark Magic
Chaos Sorcery +4 - Extensive Imperial / Extensive Dwarven
Beastman Wild Magic +5 - Extensive and Esoteric Imperial
Necromancy +2 - Extensive Imperial
Waaagh Magic +4 - Extensive Imperial / Extensive Dwarven
Skaven Warp Magic +4 - Extensive Imperial / Extensive Dwarven
Warpstone +9 - Extensive Dwarven & Imperial / Extensive and Esoteric Skaven
But what would "accomplishing something" look like? Because we will probably getting some sort of tributary going (judging by the rolls). If "something" is an actual waystone then we are not getting any time for several more years.I'd like to keep three Waystone actions a turn going at least until we have something truly actionable. Taking vacations before accomplishing anything isn't a great look, and this project lives and dies by diplomacy. Everyone needs to believe that Mathilde is fully committed to this, because if she isn't why should they be?
But what would "accomplishing something" look like? Because we will probably getting some sort of tributary going (judging by the rolls). If "something" is an actual waystone then we are not getting any time for several more years.
The expectation and average for a Councillor is to spend the equivalent of two to four actions per turn on their task. This was a straightforward yard stick at one point, but with things like subordinates, peripheral investigations, and other oddities, it's caused a lot of back-and-forth. Here's a new set of yardsticks to apply.
When considering a course of action, ask yourself the following:
Have you spent at least one action personally and directly involved with the task or project you were given?
Have you spent at least two actions directly or indirectly involved with the task or project you were given? (including half-actions spent overseeing others and tangential study of the topic at hand)
Have you spent at least three actions in ways related to your position, including overseeing subordinates and managing local wizards?
If all three are 'yes', then you'll be fine even if you do flub everything you're trying and your time-sheet does attract investigation. If you've explicitly been given a straightforward or easily outsourced task so you can focus on something else that is considered important but is not directly under the purview of your position, the above considerations do not apply.
I would assume that means deliverables, something that works that we can show off as a return on investment. A working tributary would be an example of such.But what would "accomplishing something" look like? Because we will probably getting some sort of tributary going (judging by the rolls). If "something" is an actual waystone then we are not getting any time for several more years.
I'd like to keep three Waystone actions a turn going at least until we have something truly actionable. Taking vacations before accomplishing anything isn't a great look, and this project lives and dies by diplomacy. Everyone needs to believe that Mathilde is fully committed to this, because if she isn't why should they be?
I'm not saying we need to spend every waking moment on it- but 3AP is not that. It leaves plenty of room for personal projects, as evidenced by the number of personal projects we've been advancing.
Boney himself told us that any "working" waystone that isn't a repaired one is at the loooooooooooooong end of the road of what we can accomplish (if its even possible) so I'm not ok with that marker.Actionable, to me, meaning something reproducible that can on some level imitate the function of the Waystones in slowing the spread of Chaos.)
I'm not opposed to plans that put 1 AP on Rite of Way and 1 AP on Branarhune.
The worst case scenario for codifying Rite of Way is that Mathilde eats a Battle Magic-sized miscast straight to the face. It is not a safe activity where she only has to theorize. She has to cast the codified version to test it, and that won't be nearly as safe as casting her personal version of the spell. I seriously oppose the idea of doing both RoW and liminal realms in the same turn since we can't put the Gamber on both at the same time.The big issue is that we can only use Gambler one action a turn and it's our best tool to avoid worst-case scenarios. The worst case scenario for codifying RoW is that it can't be codified at all and that's that, while the worst-case scenario for the liminal realms thing is... well, it's probably 'dying or wishing you were dead'. So people are inclined to delay one for the other - if we were to take both in the same turn, there's 99 to 1 odds that we'd assign the Gambler to the liminal realm and risk the RoW action, which could drive off potential voters. So people (including myself) will probably choose one over the other when making their plans.
Personally, I'd push for securing the liminal realm (or however that action may end up phrased) and delay RoW.
I'm not opposed to plans that put 1 AP on Rite of Way and 1 AP on Branarhune.
The worst case scenario for codifying Rite of Way is that Mathilde eats a Battle Magic-sized miscast straight to the face. It is not a safe activity where she only has to theorize. She has to cast the codified version to test it, and that won't be nearly as safe as casting her personal version of the spell. I seriously oppose the idea of doing both RoW and liminal realms in the same turn since we can't put the Gamber on both at the same time.
We've discussed quite a bit the other two ways of getting bretonian support, but I don't think there was ever much discussion on sorting out any potential diplomatic disputes between Athel Loren and Laurelorn. How might we go about that?so, those you did choose are ones with whom entangling ourselves could be problematic - both in regards to their distant kinship with our own, sometimes-troublesome neighbours, and in regards to baser matters of conflict and trade."
"As far as I am aware, there is no conflict between Athel Loren and Laurelorn-"
"As far as you are aware," she echoes. "As far as I am aware, too. But we would have to become much further aware for that to be a safe endeavour. And the effort of becoming so much further aware is effort that could be spent elsewhere - such as, for example, the Iron Orcs of the Irrana Mountains. But if you were to come to us with something more tangible than dreams, then perhaps we might be tempted."
Actually, the Room of Dawn and Dusk would work better for RoW. (Emphasis mine)It should also be noted that if we are going to be risking battle magic miscasts it is probably best to do so in the room that can mitigate such, the room we cannot use right now for the next year. All in all I think Rite of Way will have to wait. Personally I am not that said about it since we can get at least High Nehekaran done. I would like to see how knowing another magical language, one that s not directly linked to the elven tradition impacts spell codification.
Boney, if you are willing and able to field questions at this point about whether Mathilde would want the Room of Calamity for a particular action from the outset (I understand that Stuff might come up mid-action that might make her want the Room of Calamity when she hadn't before), I am interested in the "Create Orbs of Sorcery solo", "Attempt to codify Rite of Way so that others can learn it", and "Attempt to gain control of one of your Arcane Marks" actions. My expectation is, respectively, "yes" "no (either Room of Dawn and Dusk or no applicable room)" and "no (Room of Dawn and Dusk instead)"
I don't see the urgency of liminal realms unless we are planing to actually build one. More to point how does that relate to Waystones?There's more apparent urgency to the liminal realm security, and it has significantly greater potential synergy with the Waystone project.
Both the ulgu and the fact that a lot of people want the morbs to be a surprise are a problem. It would solve the problem of giving us a place to practice RoW while codifying it though....stupid ass question. Didn't we buy our own danged college a Room of Calamity? In the event of severe thread impatience couldn't we just use that(possibly with additional CF surcharge) in order to totally Morb out on those Patriarchs?
Or is the Ulgu permeated mono-environment surrounding the thing in a pocket dimension sufficiently no bueno to make this a non starter?
It will directly impact the quality of the AV book to have had a working and secure example of of a liminal realm to use as an example, and to examine in detail.I don't see the urgency of liminal realms unless we are planing to actually build one. More to point how does that relate to Waystones?
I don't see the urgency of liminal realms unless we are planing to actually build one. More to point how does that relate to Waystones?
...I may need to revise my assumptions on how I thought codifying spells worked. I thought it would be mostly writing down and seeing if Mathilde can translate her own paradigm of spellcasting into general understanding, not trying to rework it.The worst case scenario for codifying Rite of Way is that Mathilde eats a Battle Magic-sized miscast straight to the face. It is not a safe activity where she only has to theorize. She has to cast the codified version to test it, and that won't be nearly as safe as casting her personal version of the spell. I seriously oppose the idea of doing both RoW and liminal realms in the same turn since we can't put the Gamber on both at the same time.
I really want to agree with this but each Waystone action is mostly just coordinating everyone involved in the action. And I recall Boney making statements to the effect that the more actions we assign to someone per turn, the more things they have to split their attention between.While this is the standard for a Councilor position (which isn't what we're doing now), it should still be a good yardstick to measure by.
(If anything I'd argue the Waystone project would require more AP investment than the tasks given to a Councilor, as Mathilde started it and is heading it and its continued existence depends on getting actionable results.)
We'd probably have a roll to see if it's available or if it's too busy from use by the Battle Wizards....stupid ass question. Didn't we buy our own danged college a Room of Calamity? In the event of severe thread impatience couldn't we just use that(possibly with additional CF surcharge) in order to totally Morb out on those Patriarchs?
...I may need to revise my assumptions on how I thought codifying spells worked. I thought it would be mostly writing down and seeing if Mathilde can translate her own paradigm of spellcasting into general understanding, not trying to rework it.
The spell isn't safe for Mathilde to cast because she invented it, it's safe because of the Staff of Mistery. That at least won't change with a codified version.The worst case scenario for codifying Rite of Way is that Mathilde eats a Battle Magic-sized miscast straight to the face. It is not a safe activity where she only has to theorize. She has to cast the codified version to test it, and that won't be nearly as safe as casting her personal version of the spell. I seriously oppose the idea of doing both RoW and liminal realms in the same turn since we can't put the Gamber on both at the same time.