- Location
- Australia
In regards to adding legitimacy, we don't know, but I believe the expectation is a decent amount. It gives more books than any of the other options and Colleges gives 4 Extensive and Esoteric, so we can expect more than that. Simply seeing it in action for once is a motivation that's in play.I've seen a lot of talk about how Backfill will give the library more legitimacy as a real library, but how much is that actually the case, especially for a singular action?
EDIT: And is backfilling to make our library more "legit" not somewhat redundant when we've got plans for getting a crapton of books from other libraries, which will also give a huge assortment of books?
There's some redundancy but not much. Vlag and Everpeak will like the Imperial books, Verena will like the Dwarven books, the Library of Mourning will like both. Everyone would appreciate at least some of what Backfill will give us.
Everpeak, Vlag, and Mournings aren't competing for prestige, while Tilea, Estalia, and Bretonnia also have Lorekeepers. 7 libraries willing to partner with us whatever our alignment, 8 if you want to spend a GD on the Librarium. That's a hell of a lot of books, and it's sharing our books with people who want to spread knowledge, which is very much a good thing.A lot of institutional libraries were indicated to behave like Scrollbearers, even if they aren't Verenans. Their rare books are their claim to prestige.
They would be nuch harder to get on board if openly affiliated with an order that seeks to spread them
Of the libraries who wouldn't want to share with us because of our alignment, we could always bribe the head librarians. Not always an option but given these aren't the most morality-inclined people anyway, I reckon it'd be pretty effective.
Not all or most, more like half or a third.I'll be honest I have no idea what you consider the holes to be that need plugging but there are tons of different things backfill can target and we get the books at random so I feel like hoping backfill will plug any of the holes you care about it is a big gamble. The idea it will somehow plug all or most of them in a single action seems extremely unlikely.
Not at all, sorry to give that impression. My argument was based on the likelihood of it succeeding and predictions of the future, not whether it'd be worth voting for Colleges this turn. There is merit to doing Colleges this turn, just wasn't arguing from that angle.I... what are you trying to say, exactly? That we shouldn't bring up options after other ones have already been heavily voted on?
Sorry about that, I'll make sure to dial it back.I tried to avoid commenting on this, but you're making a habit of doing it constantly. I'd appreciate it if you dialed way back on making definitively declarative statements you're in no position to make.