Voted best in category in the Users' Choice awards.
Voting is open
It was in fact the dwarfs who went to war and attacked first. Sure, Caledor wounded their pride beyond belief and was very disrespectful, but actually going to war about that is quite the overreaction.

Not exactly.

The Dawi were attacked first by Malekith's forces (whom they thought were Asur because the distinction was unclear) - so like reasonable people they tried diplomacy. Caledor utterly rejected diplomacy; he didn't just insult a high ranking Dawi but the personal representative of the High King.

In effect he personally insulted the entire Karaz Ankor - probably a lot more than what he intended to given the cultural importance of beards but even in the elf understanding of diplomacy it was still effectively saying 'come at me if you're hard enough' and surprise the Dawi were hard enough.
 
The Dawi were attacked first by Malekith's forces (whom they thought were Asur because the distinction was unclear) - so like reasonable people they tried diplomacy. Caledor utterly rejected diplomacy; he didn't just insult a high ranking Dawi but the personal representative of the High King.
Yes, but I was specifically answering to the argument that he was malicious because he declared war against the dwarfs and declaring war is nearly always malicious. He didn't declare the war, but he was too incompetent to to realize his actions made war inevitable.
 
To quote one post Boney had, the Dwarfs sieged Tor Alessi 14 times- it fell the 14th, the only time that Caledor II was in command.
To give the dude some credit, if the Dwarfs knew he was there, they would have fought twice as hard, and would have been even more bloody minded than usual.

And the Phoenix crown is nothing of not noticeable.
 
It was in fact the dwarfs who went to war and attacked first. Sure, Caledor wounded their pride beyond belief and was very disrespectful, but actually going to war about that is quite the overreaction.

From the wiki: War of the Beard

There is a reason diplomats are sacred, and it is not "honor". It is because if you attack them, you are signposting that there is no possible avenue of discussion. There are very, very few surest ways to cause war than to make diplomacy unreliable and dangerous for the diplomat. At this point, it becomes one of those gnarly cases, because the other side's contempt is obvious- if they are willing to burn all bridges and insult your efforts for a peaceful resolution, what else are they willing to do? What will they do to your people tomorrow, that you have no way to redress? Are you effectively ceding all authority to them? Are they declaring war?

No, getting the door slammed on your diplomacy by a state that seems to be belligerent against your people is absolutely a declaration of war, because at that stage, you have effectively given up any pretense of not going to war, and the enemy has to prepare their defenses or strike first. If Caledor II didn't understand something so absolutely basic in any form of state making, then I think Dieter IV may have actually been more competent.
 
Last edited:
The killing of your citizens and shaming of your ambassador is more than plenty of real life wars haven been fought over.
True, but I've always felt the Dwarfen ambassador could have handled making the accusations better. Seems like the thing for a quiet chat in a little side room, not announcements in front of court.

To give the dude some credit, if the Dwarfs knew he was there, they would have fought twice as hard, and would have been even more bloody minded than usual.

And the Phoenix crown is nothing of not noticeable.
Also, if you do something a dozen times, you get to learn what works and what doesn't. The fact they even had to siege it that often probably says more about how determined the Elves were to keep the city than the failure of the Dwarfs to take it.
 
That would require Dwarfs being anything other than dwarfs.

While I am of the strong opinion that being unsubtle did not justify... anything Caledor II had done, especially since it was elves that seemed like the apparent aggressors and elves that closed the door to diplomacy...

Thorek certainly does seem capable of basic subtlety. I imagine the chosen Dwarf diplomat to their best allies should be at least as good as Thorek in this. If Caledor II was not a giga idiot. The Dawi could have handled it better. They just didn't handle it as badly as king Caledisaster.
 
In the 1200s, the Mongol Empire under Genghis Khan sent a large trade caravan along the silk road and through the Khwarezmian Empire, who was at the time at least friendly with the Mongols. For unclear reasons - possible because of a perceived insult, possibly paranoia, possibly greed - the governor of the city of Otrar arrested and executed everyone in the caravan and seized and sold the goods. Genghis sent a trio of diplomats to the Khwarazmian Shah to demand an explanation and the punishment of the city governor, and the Shah executed one of the diplomats and shaved the beards of the other two. Despite being bogged down in a rebellion in Siberia and a war with half of China at the time, the Mongols sent an army and wiped out something like 90% of the Khwarezmian population in two years.

You don't fuck with the diplomats. If a ruler will execute a diplomat during peacetime then there's no point sending one to sue for peace during war, and at that point war can only end with one side being wiped off the map.
 
Last edited:
While I am of the strong opinion that being unsubtle did not justify... anything Caledor II had done, especially since it was elves that seemed like the apparent aggressors and elves that closed the door to diplomacy...

Thorek certainly does seem capable of basic subtlety. I imagine the chosen Dwarf diplomat to their best allies should be at least as good as Thorek in this. If Caledor II was not a giga idiot. The Dawi could have handled it better. They just didn't handle it as badly as king Caledisaster.
Heh, funny thing about Thorek's entrance to Laurelorn- if he hadn't had Mathilde there he would have been speaking of Caradryel as a positive example to follow to the Eonir, when the Eonir on him is "that bastard that abandoned us".

Things would have been off to a great start.

Edit: Ignore the above
 
Last edited:
Heh, funny thing about Thorek's entrance to Laurelorn- if he hadn't had Mathilde there he would have been speaking of Caradryel as a positive example to follow to the Eonir, when the Eonir on him is "that bastard that abandoned us".

Things would have been off to a great start.
He said Bel Shanaar, not Caradryel:
"Tell them that I've heard much of them from the manlings and they seem more struck from the mold of Bel Shanaar than Caledor the Second, so I see reason to hope that our time together will echo our earliest shared history, rather than the last of it." Suppressing another wince, you translate the general gist of good repute and high hopes.
Bel Shanaar is like, the only King other than Aenarion that Laurelorn probably doesn't have a grudge against.
 
Caledor responded to questions of why his people were raiding the dwarfs with castration. Saying he didn't understand such a fundamental social aspect of what had been a close ally for centuries and that he committed that crime by accident is absurd. Responding with anything but war would be an admission that the Karaz Ankor was a lesser state and that it is the right of elves to raid dwarfs. I feel comfortable saying the dwarfs made the right decision.

I understand the urge to say that war is always the stupid option, that cooler heads can always find a better path. But Malekith wasn't going to end the raids, and Ulthuan wasn't going to admit to the dark elves' existence. Saying the dwarfs should've kept sending diplomats to be humiliated or killed rather than defend themselves feels cruel. The way to avert the war — beyond, of course, strangling Malekith in his crib — is to not put Caledor on the throne. Everything after that was inevitable.
 
Honestly everyone should just think up their own version of the War of Vengance/the Beard, because the official material is certainly not helpful in creating a clear picture of the deatails save its outcome.
 
Bel Shanaar is like, the only King other than Aenarion that Laurelorn probably doesn't have a grudge against.
Bel Shanaar had (has) an advantage no other PK had: a distinct uninterest in being anywhere near the Phoenix court, even if he cant go running around the world anymore.

Elf Court: sir! we need you at the throne building a complex web of plans and plots!

Bel:... Hello, Im not here right now, I've gone to [place] to do [thing], please leave a message after the mystical construct beeps....

Elfs: sir, that only worked the first time, please get out from under the bed...

Bel: GO AWAY.
 
Last edited:
Bel Shanaar had (has) an advantage no other PK had: a distinct uninterest in being anywhere near the Phoenix court, even if he cant go running around the world anymore.

Elf Court: sir! we need you at home building a complex web of plans and plots!

Bel:... Hello, Im not here right now, I've gone to [place] to do [thing], please leave a message after the mystical construct beeps....

Elfs: sir, that only worked the first time, please get out from under the bed...

Bel: GO AWAY.
Er, you sure you aren't thinking of Finubar?
 
1. The Dwarfs were never told about the Dark Elves. Even assuming they had heard of the existence of a breakaway faction, blaming the attacks on Malekith, who last the Dwarfs knew was a great Elven hero and close personal friend to the first High King probably wouldn't have played well.
2. Caledor II wasn't particularly interested in averting the war, because he thought he'd win.
In an alternate timeline, Malkeith appears during the War of the Beard and forms an alliance with the Dawi to 'retake' his patrimony from perfidious Caledor...

I think Caledor II thought that with the dwarves shown their proper place they'd knuckle their brows and never talk back to their betters again. His profound non-understanding of dwarven psychology meant he didn't realise they'd go full take-no-prisoners berserkermode instead.
To steal a couple of lines and mangle them horribly...

Caledor II: The Dawi should know when to bend the knee.
Gotrek Starbreaker: Would the Asur, Phoenix King? Would you?
 
Last edited:
In the 1200s, the Mongol Empire under Genghis Khan sent a large trade caravan along the silk road and through the Khwarezmian Empire, who was at the time at least friendly with the Mongols. For unclear reasons - possible because of a perceived insult, possibly paranoia, possibly greed - the governor of the city of Otrar arrested and executed everyone in the caravan and seized and sold the goods. Genghis sent a trio of diplomats to the Khwarazmian Shah to demand an explanation and the punishment of the city governor, and the Shah executed one of the diplomats and shaved the beards of the other two. Despite being bogged down in a rebellion in Siberia and a war with half of China at the time, the Mongols sent an army and wiped out something like 90% of the Khwarezmian population in two years.

You don't fuck with the diplomats. If a ruler will execute a diplomat during peacetime then there's no point sending one to sue for peace during war, and at that point war can only end with one side being wiped off the map.
Didn't all of Greece denounce Sparta for throwing the Persians in the well?
 
Caledor responded to questions of why his people were raiding the dwarfs with castration. Saying he didn't understand such a fundamental social aspect of what had been a close ally for centuries and that he committed that crime by accident is absurd. Responding with anything but war would be an admission that the Karaz Ankor was a lesser state and that it is the right of elves to raid dwarfs. I feel comfortable saying the dwarfs made the right decision.

I understand the urge to say that war is always the stupid option, that cooler heads can always find a better path. But Malekith wasn't going to end the raids, and Ulthuan wasn't going to admit to the dark elves' existence. Saying the dwarfs should've kept sending diplomats to be humiliated or killed rather than defend themselves feels cruel. The way to avert the war — beyond, of course, strangling Malekith in his crib — is to not put Caledor on the throne. Everything after that was inevitable.
Personally I feel the more moral path - and more insulting - would be for the dawi to have 'conquered' the Old World Asur. Or more accurately, swiped them out from underneath the Phoenix King by promising them equal representation to dawi subjects under the High King, then just slam the fuck out of Ulthuan when they try to reconquer. The outright extermination wasn't just atrocious, evil and insane, it was inelegant. As umgak as a beastman's loincloth.
 
Voting is open
Back
Top