- Location
- [REDACTED]- United States of America
I have my doubts. By and large the single most important place to protect with armor would be the head, and peasants would wear a helmet even if they couldn't get any other piece of armor. Following that they would protect the vital organs, i.e. a breastplate. Your extremities aren't as important - sure, nobody wants to lose a limb, but it's better to live without an arm than to be...dead. Kind of like this famous image.
I realize this is hoisting from a few pages back, but have you ever heard of jack-and-chains? It was a super-minimized collar-shoulders-elbows set of plates connected down the arms by flat chains, worn over a gambeson. I only heard of it a few months ago, but apparently it is extremely effective as armor, only putting metal where blows could otherwise cut through cloth.
Apparently very common as cheap merc armor.
Honestly it does nothing to protect against any sort of stab with a sharp implement arguably much more likely and also more lethal than a slash at a gambeson. Maybe they did exist because fuck what do I know sitting cushy in my office chair but from that office chair the jack and chains doesn't really seem too effective as a sort of armor. Useless against projectiles, only good against slashing attacks on certain facings, does nothing to prevent being stabbed center mass which is again far more dangerous than a slash along the extremities and about as useful against blunt weapons as it is against stabbing ones.