Sigh. Look I'm not a conspiracy theorist. It's part of the whole hypersanity package: I can't fully descend into paranoia even when I litterally want to. I can however brainfart from time to time and miss things. Annoyingly enough.
...I mean no disrespect, but I think you may be overestimating your own reliability.
With that being said, my point wasn't to call you a conspiracy theorist. My point was that the same neurological quirk (seeing patterns and connections that do not correspond to reality) is often
present in conspiracy theories. Humans have a very strong tendency towards pareidolia, the perception of familiar patterns, symbols, or ideas in the middle of a random collection of stimuli.
Conspiracy theorists get a lot of their energy out of this. It's
easy to see evidence of the Illuminati secretly ruling the world, for a man whose pareidolia is in full force. He'll make up connections between concepts and organizations that are spurious or logically nonsensical, or that reverse cause and effect. He'll see secret signals in commonplace things, and from them reverse-engineer elaborate "castle in the air" masses of unsupported speculation about what's "really" going on behind the scenes.
Nearly every human is susceptible to this, to one degree or another.
No I've taken the concept of a Fermi-Kardashev Filter Scale which is an obscure science fiction concept from the 80s and noticed that it is being used in the subtext of Warhammer. Specifically in the Fall of the Eldar and the Age of Strife material in 40K and in the Time of Woes and the Age of Three Emperors in Fantasy. Like Warhammer is obsessed with techo-barbarism which is itself a science fiction concept that originated in the discussions around the Fermi-Kardashev Filter Scales.
No it didn't. The idea of civilizations regressing after a catastrophe can be found in many references and sources. Plato talked about Atlantis. Plenty of historians of the classical Muslim world and imperial China had cyclic theories of history. You can find techno-barbarism (which I interpret to mean either high-tech societies with low-tech social structure, or low-tech reversion and decay from a high-tech pinnacle) in science fiction long before the 1980s and frankly going back into the '30s and '40s.
This "filter scale" you keep talking about didn't invent the concept, and it fits
very poorly to Warhammer Fantasy. Because the "filter scale" appears to be talking about the idea that a civilization experiences existential crises as it expands and advances. And that these crises are of their own making, or associated with their progress (e.g. nuclear weapons proliferation, gray goo nanotech, and so on). But in Warhammer Fantasy, civilizations usually undergo crises brought on by external forces, with internal factors being limited to maybe some traitors undermining things. The dwarves didn't cause the Time of Woes, for instance; it happened due to completely external and unpredictable factors.
As for the weird Christian Apocrypha that is the Warriors of the Veil? It's literally been there in the subtext since at least 2nd Edition of Warhammer Fantasy. Warhammer settings have been obsessed with their universes teetering on the edge of an Apocalypse since at least the early 2000s and this weird Christian Apocrypha is/was the Apocalypse the settings were teetering on the edge of.
No, not really. I mean, some of the ideas and imagery of Warhammer and the horrors of Chaos and so on are drawn from that! But only some. Not much. There's no one-to-one mapping of complex concepts involving multiple layers of mysticism and "veils" and "seals" and "sin codes" and so on. There's no direct process of these concepts being intentionally copied over and used verbatim in Warhammer, so when you try to make a complex analysis
based on the concept in Warhammer, you're inevitably going to be ignoring a lot of the facts.
It could also be a pun in some other language that descended from a territory controlled by Persia at some point. I'm just incensed there are 4 different words Eren could refer to. Like this is GW who makes a lot of shady appearing decisions with their settings for the purpose of cornering the market on Grimdark. It's why I can't unsee the whole Kislev thing: It could be a nothing accident, but with GW being the way they are I can't just not notice it.
Again, pareidolia.
If your "shady appearing decision" involves something that was
clearly intentional on the part of the artist (such as the way that mutants in Warhammer are presented as inherently, irreversibly corrupt and 'must' be killed), then you have good evidence.
If your "shady appearing decision" involves "but place name A sounds vaguely like a word in language B that is spoken by ethnic group C so
clearly the place name is a shout-out to anti-group-C racists who
of course happen to know language B and will get the subtle reference!" then you may very well be imagining things. Especially when you're talking about two-syllable nonsense country names in a fantasy setting; there are only so many possible two-syllable words to go around.