Personally, I think building all three is likely to strain our engineering assets and transportation capabilities. The Fornost mine is arguably a poor choice, but it's not as far out into the spinward part of our space as it could be, and it's relatively close to the new industrial facilities being established at Amarkia, so I'm willing to accept the extra cost in return for the great richness of the mine. Thus, I prefer one of the "one" or 'zero' bulk resource mine choices over 'three.'
Although most of the plans are building only 0 or 1 BR mines, I'm pretty sure it's more to do with pp costs and the relative unimportance of BR with our current budget rather than engineering logistics concerns.
I'm not sure if you're taking into account the logistics context properly.
The reason we were so hesitant on building mining colonies last year was because we were also building starbases. 2 starbases and 2 mining colonies (technically maybe 3 due to BR/SR split) strained our two available engineering teams (and I don't think our colony teams were a bottleneck). In addition, if you look at the GBZ updates, you can see that a single engineering team plus colony team are basically building a station/outpost + mining colony at an approximately annual rate.
If we're not building any starbases, which are pretty damn expensive in engineering costs, I'd expect even 4 mining colonies to be within our means.
I'm actually a bit confused about how lbmaian's plan costs the same (roughly) as the other two, and worried I may have missed something.
Yeah, you're missing the Starfleet Medical reorg in my plan in that final comparison.
I don't consider further diplomacy with the Lamarck to be a priority. I like having more intelligence reports. I'm not sure it's important to reorganize Starfleet Medical, though we may still want to do that. Outreach to the Licori seems like a good idea, but I'm coming to understand why the majority are supporting SWB's plan.
I consider Lamarck a strategic target because of the vicinity of Dawiar and Lecarre, and staking a more solid claim on the Straits of Themis. Along with a getting a mini-intel update on the Hishmeri and possibly Ataami situation, although that's a secondary concern with the Hishmeri threat projected to be over soonish.
If I had to drop a diplo push, it would be Lamarck, but I had trouble trying to figure out another option to fill in the 70pp freed up from giving up the +1 intel report. My other option would be another tech team, but that requires sacrificing a mining colony and we already have 2 free tech teams this year.
And I did want that +1 intel report, but a 70pp cost is awfully hard to justify. Particularly when I think we somewhat freed up a intel report slot from our research last year.
My reasons for the Starfleet Medical reorg: "for possible crew-related bonuses, supporting the new hospital ship buildup, and logistics synergy with the engineering reorg." (although "synergy" isn't the best word there)
You may have missed the details- but I'm arguing we did, in effect, and that's why a Kepler has Science 8 when no other non-specialist ship less than three times its size comes close to that benchmark.
I didn't miss it - it's just not a believable enough explanation by itself. Frankly, if I could put a ~100kt S5 "Oberth module" even at inefficient tech crew & SR cost, I'd put them on every damn sciency ship I could. Sure, there's going to have "compatibility" issues of sorts, but that's such an insane science efficiency. Now, a ~200-300kt S5 module with inefficient tech crew & SR cost, or similarly sized "module" with different science vs tech crew & SR trade-offs, would more believable to me. I'm fine with the overall explanation qualitatively, just not quantitatively - it requires too much fudging without background retconning IMO.