KlavoHunter
THOU SHALT WORSHIP NO GODS ABOVE ENTERPRISE!
[x] UFS Kia
Why do our ships keep getting stolen so easily???
Why do our ships keep getting stolen so easily???
If you want you vote to count it should be spelled "Kea".
There are several things that can't be replicated. In DS9, Chief O'Brien had to go to Terok Nor to salvage Cardassian plasma distribution manifolds because they specifically couldn't be replicated. In TNG, they couldn't replicate ribosomes for a Romulan to live. In Voyager, they couldn't replicate replacement lungs for Neelix or Borg cortical nodes.Actually, at least in Archers time we see fully automated repair stations (even if not owned by starfleet/united earth), that do seem to be using Replicators to pretty much fully repair the ship.
There are several things that can't be replicated. In DS9, Chief O'Brien had to go to Terok Nor to salvage Cardassian plasma distribution manifolds because they specifically couldn't be replicated. In TNG, they couldn't replicate ribosomes for a Romulan to live. In Voyager, they couldn't replicate replacement lungs for Neelix or Borg cortical nodes.
That suggests there are complex biological chemicals/medicine and advanced technology that can't be replicated. The NX-01 was likely too primitive to have or didn't suffer damage to something not replicable.
It makes perfect sense if the technologies are related but not the same. In-universe both replicators and transporters have components that each other don't share as dialogue indicates.Which doesn't make any sense for the biological stuff because anything that can be transported by a transporter can also be replicated that way, using the pattern they use to turn the energy back into matter.
It breaks down to writers being stupid about the tech that is around, or willfully ignoring it for "plot" reasons.
It makes perfect sense if the technologies are related but not the same. In-universe both replicators and transporters have components that each other don't share as dialogue indicates.
You're simply ignoring every time the writing has distinguished the two technologies.It doesn't make sense.
Because transporter still use patterns to recreate the original matter state.
If you have a copy of that pattern you can just recreate it using that, see the transporter clone/duplicate episodes as an example.
Which doesn't make any sense for the biological stuff because anything that can be transported by a transporter can also be replicated that way, using the pattern they use to turn the energy back into matter.
It breaks down to writers being stupid about the tech that is around, or willfully ignoring it for "plot" reasons.
The pattern in the transporter sense is some kind of active, dynamic thing that needs storage rather than pure data. The replicator pattern is a recipe.It doesn't make sense.
Because transporter still use patterns to recreate the original matter state.
If you have a copy of that pattern you can just recreate it using that, see the transporter clone/duplicate episodes as an example.
It doesn't make sense.
Because transporter still use patterns to recreate the original matter state.
If you have a copy of that pattern you can just recreate it using that, see the transporter clone/duplicate episodes as an example.
There are several things that can't be replicated. In DS9, Chief O'Brien had to go to Terok Nor to salvage Cardassian plasma distribution manifolds because they specifically couldn't be replicated. In TNG, they couldn't replicate ribosomes for a Romulan to live. In Voyager, they couldn't replicate replacement lungs for Neelix or Borg cortical nodes.
That suggests there are complex biological chemicals/medicine and advanced technology that can't be replicated. The NX-01 was likely too primitive to have or didn't suffer damage to something not replicable.
[x] UFS European
Relevant XKCD
I don't think being offended by the technology having pretty consistent limits helps anything. You want a replicator to be able to instantly make anything, it doesn't. It instantly makes food and 212st century technology. For more you need industrial replicators or even more specialized equipment. None of this seems particularly unreasonable as engineering limits. You want to fix that make a better replicator.That's because the writers hated replicators and deliberately didn't use them properly (see up thread)
You could totally replicate the plasma manifolds, but then you wouldn't have the spooky Terok Nor episode.
No it suggests the writers hated the technology and deliberately wrote in excuses to not use it. Unfortunately, canon has to factor in that the answer to limitations to certain technologies is "the writers wanted it x way on y episode for plot reasons"
So really the limitations are "what the writer/GM/QM" say they are.
I don't think being offended by the technology having pretty consistent limits helps anything. You want a replicator to be able to instantly make anything, it doesn't. It instantly makes food and 212st century technology. You want to fix that make a better replicator
In addition to foodstuffs, replicators could be used for replicating an almost limitless range of other objects. Complex devices (TNG: "The Game", "The Child"; DS9: "Rivals", "Captive Pursuit"; VOY: "Phage", "The Killing Game", "Dark Frontier", "Tsunkatse"), weapons (DS9: "Civil Defense", "Inquisition", "Call to Arms"; VOY: "Counterpoint", "Flesh and Blood"), machine components (DS9: "Distant Voices", "Image in the Sand"; VOY: "Extreme Risk", "One Small Step", "Latent Image"), clothing (TNG: "The Survivors"; DS9: "Distant Voices", "Paradise"; VOY: "Caretaker", "Vis à Vis", "Someone to Watch Over Me", "Flesh and Blood"), medication (VOY: "Latent Image", "Fury", "Body and Soul"), coins (TNG: "The Game", "The Perfect Mate"), musical instruments (TNG: "The Neutral Zone", "Inheritance"), antique furniture (VOY: "Lineage"), photographs (VOY: "Human Error"), and a wide range of other items. Industrial replicators could even be used to replicate heavier machine parts, to help build factories, power plants etc. (DS9: "For the Cause") [..]
A genetronic replicator could extrapolate actual organs for use in medical transplants from a DNA sample, though this device was experimental. (TNG: "Ethics") [...]
If the object desired contained a certain degree of complexity in its molecular structure, it could not be replicated. (TNG: "The Enemy"; VOY: "Imperfection") Talaxian lungs were considered too complex to replicate, as Talaxian physiology included a complex series of neural links between the lungs and the rest of the body that replicators were unable to duplicate exactly. (VOY: "Phage") Certain medicatical compounds could not be replicated, nor could Cardassian plasma distribution manifolds (or rather the beta-matrix compositor used in making them), Borg cortical nodes, or bio-neural gel packs. (TNG: "Code of Honor"; DS9: "The Abandoned", "Empok Nor"; VOY: "Learning Curve", "Imperfection")
I don't think being offended by the technology having pretty consistent limits helps anything. You want a replicator to be able to instantly make anything, it doesn't. It instantly makes food and 212st century technology. For more you need industrial replicators or even more specialized equipment. None of this seems particularly unreasonable as engineering limits. You want to fix that make a better replicator.
At a minimum, why can't you just replicate a ship? First, cubic volume problem and energy requirements. And second, Prodigy suggests they're getting to the point where they will be able to soon. At least on a shuttle scale.
The only time it couldn't are.. surprise surprise, when it was a plot element:
It's almost as if it's limitations are writer dependent, and therefore, the writers intentions are relevant.
So yes, the writers not liking the technology is entirely relevant.
And sometimes the constraints for a part Oran organ are outside the design bounds of what you can do. Sometimes a replicator-friendly part just won't cut it. This is not unrealistic, this is engineering. Manufacturing is COMPLICATED.
Because they were doing trade and resupply the entire trip. It was a plot point a lot of the time.Okay, fine. I have two question for you then. Without access to industrial replicators, how did Voyager keep making their shuttles, and especially their Delta Flyers?
How did they repair their systems and hull damage?
My point is replicators are probably only limited by writer fiat and the knowledge of how to program their recopies. (And energy, likely.)
The ony Consistent limits seem to be the physical size of the unit (can't make things bigger than can actually fit inside the thing) and available power.I like thinking that replicator can't fabricate warp coils or phaser components. That there is some exotic process those components have to go through to give them the ability to function that a replicator can't do.
Because they were doing trade and resupply the entire trip. It was a plot point a lot of the time.
... Funny you mention that. With who? Federation technology is pretty different, they have no replicators for most of the early seasons*, and most critically, the only time it's brought up that they actually traded technology or resources is..
Think Tank and Killing Game. (Janeway mentions that replicators seemed to be very popular that year in Think Tank, which implies they're likely becoming more common outside Kazon held areas.)
If anything, the deals seemed to fall through, and I run strictly on a "if I didn't see it, it didn't happen" rule for filling in the blanks. There's exactly two or so examples of actual trading seemingly done.
Like.. I can kinda understand trade and resupply, but we run straight into the issue of "they still need to make stuff in house. " Especially for any sensitive system. So uh..
Again. How?
That's the difference- you're trying to make problems and going 'if I didn't see it it didn't happen' and I'm solving problems based on what makes sense and we know is possible. I don't think we'll agree here
The writers not really caring a lot of the time. Some VOY episodes took the time to mention trade or mining missions they went on to help with supplies, but others they just moved on because it's an episodic show wearing the skin of a serialized story.Okay, fine. I have two question for you then. Without access to industrial replicators, how did Voyager keep making their shuttles, and especially their Delta Flyers?
How did they repair their systems and hull damage?
My point is replicators are probably only limited by writer fiat and the knowledge of how to program their recopies. (And energy, likely.)
The writers not really caring a lot of the time. Some VOY episodes took the time to mention trade or mining missions they went on to help with supplies, but others they just moved on because it's an episodic show wearing the skin of a serialized story.
Reminds me of this one.Sure, that's actually a good answer. I think personally it's why I don't like using VOY for any canon thing because the writers are inconsistent.